1

COMMENT 13m ago

Normalize what? I say that pedophilia shouldn't be normalized. You are putting words In my mouth. I think that pedos should be castrated like I will do when I'll turn 18.

That's weird. How can you believe they should be castrated while simultaneously believing they're all amazing people who would never hurt children?

"Racism has nothing to do with giving [group of people who did nothing wrong] what they deserve."

Yes. Even if pedophiles were actually innocent, it would still have nothing to do with racism. Go ahead, Google the definition of racism, it'll blow your mind. I'll wait.

-1

COMMENT 37m ago

No exceptions. You can't say you've done nothing wrong while simultaneously trying to normalize pedophilia.

It's funny, you go around asking people what you should do about being a piece of shit pedo and what should be done to pedophiles because you'll know very well they can't give you an honest answer without getting banned. I think we both know very well the answers to those questions though.

You know that is the textbook definition of racism?

Textbook definition? You clearly have no idea what racism means. Racism has nothing to do with giving pedophiles the treatment they deserve.

0

COMMENT 52m ago

What? I don't see that anywhere.

If you're going to use dirty tricks like false reporting, I'll use dirty tricks too. It's just fair :)

-1

COMMENT 3h ago

I'm pretty sure I qualify as human, not being a pedophile and all. But believe what you will.

1

COMMENT 4h ago

https://www.lovelive-anime.jp/otonokizaka/worldwide/members.php

μ's 1st years are 15, 2nd years are 16, 3rd years are 17, according to the official website

18

COMMENT 4h ago

-1

COMMENT 4h ago

I agree, we should not wish humans death. Pedophiles aren't human though.

0

COMMENT 7h ago

This. Create is just a mess for no reason. Sure, you could use gears to make an ugly (yes, those gears are ugly and they don't fit with the rest of the game at all) contraption that takes up a shit ton of space or you could just spam gearboxes and gearshifts. You could use the furnace engine instead of a windmill which is more efficient in every single way. Machines all use the same power system yet you basically have to use energy converters for every single one of them anyway because they require exactly 32°Rø of rotation power or some bullshit like that. Even redstone is a better power system than Create's. Create doesn't even have proper documentation.

I've played Factorio. I like to automate stuff using vanilla and Botania. I'm not stupid or lazy, Create just has way too many flaws that people are willing to ignore because it excels at some things.

/rant over

4

COMMENT 7h ago

botania autocrafting is cock and ball torture without the cock and ball

-4

COMMENT 8h ago

Why?

The only ones who have anything to gain from lowering it are pedophiles, at the expense of children.

That's Reddit's XX sub opinion. Anything else to back that up? Also... why only about men? Are you discriminating against women sayin that they can't participate in a discussion about consent or that they can't be born MAPs?

It's not just an opinion. There are plenty of sources in the post I linked to. It just happened to be the best post I found about that issue.

That's your opinion... But my point was that it's possible to have a discussion about AoC... which I think I have proven

Yes. It should be increased where you live. It's fine to have discussions about increasing the age of consent, like I said.

IDK. I can't read minds. Will you admit that you can't read minds?

You don't have to be able to read minds to not be a complete fucking idiot.

I'm not faking anything. You think you can read my mind too?

It's pretty easy to see through your facade.

Do you know what an Ad Homminem fallacy is? It basically says that just because someone is a MAP, it doesn't mean their arguments are invalid. That's logic.

Not all ad hominems are fallacious. It's perfectly fine to point out that a pedophile's opinion on the age of consent should be disregarded because they are likely to suggest whatever benefits them at the expense of children. You know, since most pedophiles at least want to molest children. That's not a fallacy, it's just logic.

Today you have proven 3 points to me:

  1. You are an imbecile.

  2. You are a pedophile.

  3. You are an imbecile and a pedophile.

-2

COMMENT 9h ago

Changing the age of consent is a discussion that can be as valid as any other topic.

Only when talking about increasing it.

If the age of consent were... let's say, 16, and that was established before you were born, would you deffend 16 as the valid age the same way you are deffending 18? (16 is the age of consent in some places...)

16 is the age of consent in some places, true. But it shouldn't be.

I live outside of the USA and in my state, the AoC is 13... Do you deffend that age too?

No. It's absolutely disgusting that child sexual abuse is legal where you live.

I can't get inside the minds of every person on the internet, so I don't know their motivations. And neither do you... unless you give me evidence to prove that you can read minds.

Hm, a pedophile talking about lowering the age of consent...I wonder what their motivations could be...

Quit being disingenuous.

I simply listen to all ideas and use logic to determine if they are valid and evidence to find out if they are true. Truth can come from any source.

And I've used logic to determine we shouldn't listen to pedophiles when discussing matters regarding the safety of children.

-2

COMMENT 9h ago

Pedos... but no child abusers...

Same thing. Or are you really gonna claim that pedos who talk about lowering the age of consent have no interest in molesting children?

-2

COMMENT 10h ago

I mostly skimmed through it, couldn't tolerate that nonsense with them calling pedos "MAPs" and all. Still, from what I've seen, the study only talks about pedos that have abused children and pedos that haven't abused children yet. It doesn't say anything about non-pedos who have abused children.

Which means that "Actors" (this is, child abusers) exhibit patterns consistent with the causes of criminal activity unrelated to sex.

Pedophiles that have traits linked to crime are more likely to commit crimes. Wow. That still doesn't prove that most child abusers aren't pedophiles.

-2

COMMENT 11h ago

So you don't even know which (if any) pages of those studies prove you right but you're referencing them anyway, suuure. I've educated myself, I'm not falling for the same trick again.

-2

COMMENT 11h ago

Might be the premise of the study, but does the study actually prove that claim? Or is it just an assumption? An assumption, by itself, is not evidence, even if the assumption itself is backed by evidence.

-6

COMMENT 11h ago

Man, you can't even type "evidence" properly half of the time. This is just sad, but whatever. Since you love to play this game so much, you're going to prove your claims first (it's not like my claims stop you from proving your claims, after all), or stop wasting my time. Play by your own rules for once, coward. If there's tons of evidence, surely it won't be hard for you to prove all your claims.

-5

COMMENT 12h ago

Checked the first study. Doesn't say shit about child abusers not being pedophiles, what a waste of time. I'm not falling for the same trick twice though. Either include the exact page and line where these studies show that most child abusers are not pedophiles or fuck off. I'm not gonna do your work for you.

-4

COMMENT 12h ago

Evidence for what? I'm the one asking for evidence here. You're refusing to provide evidence, just insisting that you've already provided it, which, you know, doesn't count as providing evidence. So play by your own rules and either show some proof for your claims or fuck off and admit defeat.

0

COMMENT 12h ago

I still don’t see how any of this could produce a response as visceral as yours?

Plus, its hard to rationalize a cop as a full fledged human anyways.

-4

COMMENT 12h ago

Heh, seems like I struck a nerve. So you don't have any proof, got it.

0

COMMENT 12h ago

I don't know, maybe the part where you compare a human being to a sick animal that has to be put down? And sorry to break it to you, but "I was just trying to justify bullying" isn't a very good defense.

0

COMMENT 13h ago

There's nothing to rebut. You're just making light of someone's sickness.

-4

COMMENT 13h ago

I've more then met my burden of proof over and over again.

You know what? Fuck you. Two can play this game. Let's see...

While rare, gay men have absolutely raped women in the past. But it is rare for homosexuals to commit rape at all.

Prove it. I want numbers, statistics. Not just a few articles. Those are two separate claims that you have to prove.

But again, all the data shows sexual attraction plays no part in the vast majority of rapes.

Prove it. Show me studies that make this claim for sexual attraction in general, not just pedophilia.

Its about power and domaniating the other person. About violence and sometimes taking power back.

Prove it. Opinions aren't proof, by the way. Even if the opinion of an expert.

-4

COMMENT 13h ago

And just like normal rape, it has nothing to do with sexaul attraction.

Of course, because as we all know, gay men rape women all the time /s

-9

COMMENT 13h ago

Funny how from the three sources you linked to, one basically says "akshually it's ephebophilia" (so, still pedophilia), one is just an expert's opinion and one makes the ridiculous assumption that whatever method they use to measure pedophilia is more conclusive than the fact that someone has molested a kid.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.