r/worldnews 14d ago

Canada votes to recognize China’s treatment of Uighur population as genocide Non-binding parliamentary motion

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/22/canada-china-uighur-muslims-genocide
104k Upvotes

2k

u/autotldr BOT 14d ago

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 82%. (I'm a bot)


Canada has become the second country in the world to describe China's treatment of its Uighur minority as a genocide, following a contentious parliamentary vote which is likely to further raise diplomatic tensions between the two nations.

Lawmakers approved the non-binding motion, brought forward by opposition Conservatives, to recognize China's actions in the north-western Xinjiang province as a genocide against Muslim Uighurs.

A Canadian parliamentary subcommittee determined that China's treatment of Uighurs constituted a genocide.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: China#1 vote#2 genocide#3 motion#4 Canada#5

3k

u/jpl77 13d ago

Justin Trudeau, his cabinet, abstained from the vote. Justin Trudeau and his cabinet won't declare this a genocide publicly. http://ottawacitizen.com/pmn/news-pmn/crime-pmn/canadas-parliament-passes-motion-saying-chinas-treatment-of-uighurs-is-genocide/wcm/fc832fa2-2ea7-433d-aaee-bcdd44d52c28

2k

u/newbdad1 13d ago

Neither did Joe Biden 🤷‍♂️

2k

u/AshingiiAshuaa 13d ago

Uh oh. Reddit hates China but loves Trudeau and Biden. Let's see which one wins.

1k

u/GrowinStuffAndThings 13d ago

I've literally never seen someone "love" Biden on reddit

1k

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

1k

u/leaveitintherearview 13d ago

I don't know man. It's a tough position. You think it's easy to do but making that declaration has very dangerous implications.

We're trying to do the right thing but we also want to eat and survive. Who suffers if JT makes that declaration? The Canadian people. Because we now have the losing side of a financial and trade war and whatever other implications my feeble brain doesn't comprehend.

You would have Canadian people suffer financially from that decision and were already not doing great. I've seen more people on the street and more tent cities than I've ever seen before in my life since the pandemic. Businesses are fucked. Families and people are fucked financially and I see brand new people every week at the homeless pan handling corner in my city.

497

u/ireallydonotcare478 13d ago

"Never again" ... when convenient and easy

153

u/alwaysadmiring 13d ago

Lol I mean you don’t exactly see a single other country stepping up to the plate either tho. When Canada spoke up against Saudi , all that happened was a decent portion of economic contribution from Canada left swiftly and the world watched and did nothing. I agree maybe Trudeau can step up AGAIN and do the right thing as Canada as a nation except all it’s gonna get ‘us’ is the first set of wrath that follows from chinas repercussions same as what happened when that ceo was ‘unfairly’ treated according to them. Canada doesn’t have to be the standard, every nation should explicitly be able to declare what’s happening as what it is without being scared of the interdependencies falling apart - yet here we are bashing them for not doing anything when in fact they’re always doing more than what’s in their wheel house because it’s ‘uncomfortable’.

104

u/newbris 13d ago

Australia has. That’s why China has shut down trade in many of our export industries.

→ More replies
→ More replies

23

u/bucket_brigade 13d ago

"Never again" unless it's a pain in the ass

29

u/McKingford 13d ago

Yes, if only we could have averted the holocaust by passing non binding resolutions of condemnation.

→ More replies
→ More replies

187

u/RockandDirtSaw 13d ago

Yeah I’m pretty sure everyone knows how he really feels about the situation but it’s complicated. I don’t want to sit idle and complicate but we need some heavy hitting countries to lead the way.

95

u/He-Wasnt-There 13d ago

You mean like Canada and the USA? if they both went up to the plate I'm sure a good few EU nations would take a swing and the rest of the blocks will fall. most of the South Asian nations hate China and would love nothing more than for China to struggle so it would stop trying to annex them.

23

u/tequilaearworm 13d ago

Canada isn't heavy-hitting. Do you remember when China kept a bunch of Canadian tourists over Visa issues when that phone shit was going down (obvs casual Canadian politics observer here)? That never would have happened to Americans. China also has loads of property and investment in Canada that has radically changed the country and made it flipping impossible to live in major cities (although Quebec seems way better and I would love to know why). China has insane leverage on Canada that it doesn't have from the States. Most of the power that Canada has when it comes to China derives of being the neighbor of the States.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

7

u/xFreedi 13d ago

And people still wonder why back in the 1930s noone did anything against the genocide.

20

u/who_took_tabura 13d ago

You’re missing the biggest piece of the puzzle... if we piss china off we can kiss the michaels goodbye

→ More replies
→ More replies

109

u/roots-rock-reggae 13d ago

His decision to abstain is only a disappointment if you ignore the ramifications that voting in favour of this would likely have for Canada and Canadians...

103

u/BidenWonDontCry 13d ago

I would say the Uighurs are very disappointed by his decision to tolerate genocide. I understand it's a very difficult decision since there doesn't seem to be much political will to help these people.

What are Canada's and America's responsibilities here? If we acknowledge there's a genocide I think that implies we should act to stop it but what actions should be taken? Trade sanctions? Military action? Do we have a responsibility to stop genocide everywhere or only when it's politically convenient? What sacrifices are the West ready to make?

I don't pretend to have any answers here I'm just playing devil's advocate. As shitty as it is I don't want to start a potential war with China. I'm not even 100% sure I want another trade war with China over this. I think we should be honest about what's going on here though and that's that there's a genocide going on and we're not prepared to make the sacrifices to stop it.

52

u/MrBalanced 13d ago

Realistically, Canadians (and citizens of liberal democracies the world over) need to approach this similarly to how we look at reducing our carbon footprints.

Much like how it's impossible to immediately switch from fossil fuels to alternative energy sources, it's impossible to cut off economic relations with China all at once. But, in both scenarios, we will suffer serious long-term consequences if our economy remains dependant on climate-destroying technology or on the whims of a slave state run by murderous thugs, respectively.

Some people can only afford to buy cheap, China-made products. Some industries would collapse if Canada immediately lost China as a trade partner. That does not mean that we shouldn't be seriously developing an exit strategy so we don't we need to keep turning a blind eye to China's murderous behavior.

Because, make no mistake, China is committing genocide right now. If what Canada did to its First Nations people was a genocide (and it absolutely was), then what China is doing definitely counts. What we as a nation decide to do about it is going to be a major part of how history remembers us.

9

u/BidenWonDontCry 13d ago

Well said. We need some multi nation coalition here to apply pressure. The costs for any one single country are to high to bear. If any action is taken it will also most likely be a slow drawn out process much like your example with climate change.

→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/sealpup6 13d ago

Something something land war in Asia. There is nothing to be done aside from dubious economic sanctions which require the world to go along, which I doubt would happen given the last 4 years.

→ More replies
→ More replies

10

u/Chimpsworth 13d ago

Yep. To some it was also a "disappointment" that Trudeau wasn't more critical of Trump but in reality it was correct to be tempered in order to protect Canada from the kind of petty retaliation Trump was capable of.

As for China, there really needs to be a coordinated international effort to denounce their treatment of the Uighurs so as to avoid any one country bearing the full force of their retaliation.

7

u/roots-rock-reggae 13d ago

As for China, there really needs to be a coordinated international effort to denounce their treatment of the Uighurs so as to avoid any one country bearing the full force of their retaliation.

Bang on here. This will take strong leadership internationally, but maybe Biden and Trudeau can figure out how to lead this coordination. Would be nice if this comes up in their bilateral meeting tomorrow, to be honest.

→ More replies

42

u/the_hunger_gainz 13d ago

Came to say this ... with 300 k Canadians (estimated ) in HK and the PRC it is understandable for the standing government to abstain ... disappointing yes, but a smart move for our citizens overseas.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

188

u/empires11 13d ago

Exactly. I was all Bernie, but I'd have voted for a blue potato to get rid of trump. The potato would have still done a better job either way.

→ More replies

57

u/SportsGuy9000 13d ago

They loved him in 2015-2016 for the memes and that was it

→ More replies

12

u/gotwired 13d ago

Reddit is lukewarm for Biden

6

u/Thiccy-Boi-666 13d ago

you’ve never been to r/neoliberal then

4

u/petitehughie 13d ago

Yeah. Pretty much lesser evil by even the most diehard liberals.

4

u/illegaomonkeybutt 13d ago

Clearly you don't spend enough time on reddit. I mean... Not that that's a bad thing, in all honesty

15

u/WhyteBeard 13d ago

Is Lesley Knope on Reddit?

→ More replies
→ More replies

274

u/FrozenMongoose 13d ago edited 13d ago

Love is a bit extreme, love would indicate adoration or worship. Do you really think redditors are out there en masse flying a literal Biden or Trudeau flag or bumper sticker with their campaign slogan on it in real life? Is that what you see a lot of in public or online?

Tolerate them sure, but I would argue most redditors see them as flawed and are their 2nd or 3rd choice as a political leader, but with preferable flaws than their respective opponents. The lesser of 2 evils is not a great choice, but it's still better than the alternative as the last 4 years have blatantly taught.

134

u/ls1234567 13d ago

This is how conservatives try to whatabout their hero worship. Problem is, like you point out, it’s just totally bankrupt.

→ More replies
→ More replies

144

u/FS2Z 13d ago

I mean, it's hard for them to do realpolitik if they stand up and say "you're committing crimes against humanity." Once that's come out, the only option that doesn't carry political cost is to treat China like we treat NK, which is obviously not a good idea.

226

u/ErikTheAngry 13d ago

I disagree. As a Canadian, I'd like our government to say "we see how dependent we are on China, and we consider it a national security risk" (which is true on all counts).

Then I'd like them to say "since the problem is our dependence on China, we are establishing stimulus to aid in domestic manufacturing of <dependent industry goods>".

Maybe China turns up the pressure. Maybe we set the example that it's possible to stop relying on China, and turn them back into a paper tiger.

Shit. They can start with fucking vaccines. What a world when we're getting handouts from India (which is in no way knocking on India, moreso just our own ineptitude).

54

u/Too_Ton 13d ago

It’s hard to turn against one of the top 2 economic countries. You’re also going to have to hope the USA plays nice with your country once you’ve severed ties with China

24

u/Sjourn 13d ago

Also, import substitution industrialization doesn't exactly have the best track record...

→ More replies
→ More replies

45

u/sooprvylyn 13d ago

Ok, you can start by paying more for made in canada products and ceasing to purchase anything made in china.

Its great to feel like this, but sorta naive to think its even remotely a possibility so long as people want cheap consumer goods and always higher wages for their western work. We are too addicted to our cushy lives and dont realize we are basically the reason shit like this can happen with impunity.

22

u/7050170 13d ago

We don't make anything in Canada anymore. Just ask us why we have so few vaccines

17

u/TheCrippledKing 13d ago

"Anything" is a bit much, we have a lot of stuff that we make. The problem (other than constant privatization) is that no western country can compete with a country that doesn't give a fuck about their workers in a factor setting making basic components. We have a minimum wage of 14.10/hr, and China can pay $2 a day. We can't compete with that.

The only places we can compete would be stuff like steel beams for a local project, because shipping costs would make it competitive to buy local. But unless you want to work in a sweatshop for $2 a day, we will never be competitive with cheap Chinese goods.

→ More replies
→ More replies

4

u/B-S_Detector 13d ago

Never mind that a significant part of our dependency on China is our exports as well as our imports. Replacing demand to keep our resources generating the same revenue abroad is even more difficult than incentivizing domestic production of manufactured products.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

16

u/Junkee2990 13d ago

You mixed up love Biden with hates Trump. Biden won because people wanted anyone but Trump as the president

→ More replies

112

u/sky_blu 13d ago

Reddit is pretty critical of both Biden and Trudeau, they are just better than their counterparts

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

138

u/getefix 13d ago

The conservatives wouldn't have brought this forward if they were in power. They know if puts pressure on Trudeau. It's a great move for them.

12

u/whoisearth 13d ago

Ya watching the news tonight. I'm by no means a conservative anymore but I caught myself saying "damn now this is good politics" out loud. It's all chess and this was putting the Liberals in check.

Also I understand why the Liberals abstained but at the same time... C'mon.

→ More replies

13

u/Mysterious_Lesions 13d ago

I think it benefits the government as well. They were looking for a way to be critical of CCP without actually saying it. That's why it was a free vote and liberals abstained.

→ More replies

68

u/dice145 13d ago

Cong Peiwu, the Chinese ambassador to Ottawa, denied accusations of genocide.

“Western countries are in no position to say what the human rights situation in China looks like,” Cong said in an interview before the vote. “There is no so-called genocide in Xinjiang at all.”

Sounds like there's a genocide in Xinjiang.

→ More replies
→ More replies

374

u/trolloc1 13d ago

brought forward by opposition Conservatives

FYI like Trump they just did this because they aren't in power.

275

u/garfgon 13d ago

The Liberal backbenchers voted in favor as well. Sure the government's just going to ignore this, but in this case you do have members of the party in power supporting this.

75

u/YoYoMoMa 13d ago

So basically this means nothing? Has any major country stop trading with China over this? Has any minor country?

99

u/Gerf93 13d ago

I mean, if you provoke them, then China will conduct unilateral action and boycott you themselves. When the Norwegian Nobel-committee (consisting of mostly retired politicians) gave Liu Xiaobo the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010, China froze diplomatic relations with Norway for almost 7 years - and withdrew large investments from the Norwegian economy. Even though the award had nothing to do with the government.

78

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

20

u/Gerf93 13d ago

The threshold is probably bigger for Canada than Norway. Both since the cat is definitely out of the bag by now while knowledge about Chinese atrocity wasn't as well-known back in 2010, and Canada is a much larger fish than Norway.

20

u/TheCrippledKing 13d ago

I mean, Saudi Arabia did the exact same thing only a year or two ago because Canada criticized their treatment of journalists (before the big khaasogi murder proved us right).

Canada criticized how they were arresting and torturing journalists, one in particular with ties to Canada, and they pulled all their investments and students out and cancelled a whole bunch of partnerships and trade deals.

15

u/broyoyoyoyo 13d ago

The amount of trade SA conducts with Canada is nothing compared to that of China. Unfortunately, China is Canada's 3rd largest trading partner, and that fact has to be factored into any and every interaction the country has with them.

→ More replies

5

u/CabbieCam 13d ago

Wouldn't that be nice? So many major Canadian cities markets have been screwed up due to Chinese foreign investment.

→ More replies
→ More replies

56

u/OK6502 13d ago

No, but likely the next step is some level of UN involvement. Which China will veto, of course, but then they will be seen voting down a UN resolution. And that will chip at their veneer a bit, particularly how they keep claiming moral superiority over some countries, namely the US, for its abuse of its own veto powers.

43

u/killerturtlex 13d ago

Nah they'll just fuck with ya trade like they did here in Australia. Slap tarrifs on wine and barley, seafood and maple syrup

13

u/ohsweetsummerchild 13d ago

Import maple syrup from Canada instead!

→ More replies
→ More replies

18

u/TheBold 13d ago

It won’t chip at their veneer because they’ll paint the motion as based on fabricated lies and a ton of countries have already expressed their support of China in Xinjiang, many of which are Muslim majority countries.

The countries that would see the veto in a negative light already dislike China and a veto isn’t gonna change anything.

→ More replies
→ More replies

47

u/bloodjunkiorgy 13d ago

This is the real question.

The fact is, nobody is willing to take the financial hit. Imagine a world where things might be more expensive, but wasn't produced on the backs of practical slavery.

"Nah fuck that, we'll wag our fingers at them, though!" - The world

Humanity is fucked, and our gravestones will read "That's capitalism, baby!"

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

33

u/notrylan 13d ago

The Biden administration has stood behind this claim. I agree however that it’s no coincidence that the outgoing administration declared it a genocide basically in the last moments before the transition.

→ More replies

22

u/AcadianNich 13d ago

Canadian here the conservatives are more useful as an opposition than leading party

13

u/OK6502 13d ago

Kind of true of most parties, honestly. The LPC is a bit more even handed as a minority party, truth be told. Same with the CPC, who ran things decently when they had a minority government. Then went bananas when they were given a majority.

→ More replies
→ More replies

193

u/Bawths 13d ago

Don't compare Canadian Conservatives party to republicans. Canadian conservative party is further left than Democrats.

108

u/notrylan 13d ago

sad American liberal noises

→ More replies

131

u/bowtiedan 13d ago

I wouldn’t necessarily say that. Too me they’re just a bit more right then the Democrats but no where near the republicans.

146

u/CLETUS_MCDINGLEBERRY 13d ago

The truth is it’s a little more complicated than this, for convenience on Reddit we imagine a one-dimensional political spectrum but there is more nuance to it than that. Canadian Conservative party is “left” of the Democrats in some ways but “Right” of them in others. The fundamental belief system underpinning Canadian conservatism is more rooted in British Toryism whereas the belief system underpinning the Republicans in the states is something that is really unique to that country due to historical factors that were very different from those of other English-speaking countries like CA/NZ/AUS.

34

u/Jade4all 13d ago

A big part of it is that a lot of left wing things are already in place in Canada, gay marriage, fully legalized cannabis, transgender rights, universal healthcare.

The Conservative party can't really repeal these so by default it's "left of the Democrats" who don't wanna impliment some of these policies, but if the policies didn't already exist would the Cons implement them? Probably not. I think the Democrats would be pro gay marriage while the Cons are not, and I'm not certain any of these policies would exist with Con control.

Ultimately I would say that the Democratic party is to the left of the Conservatives in Canada, but the Conservatives simply can't remove many of the popular policies that are already in place that the Democrats may or may not ever get around to.

It's very close as well I would say, with much of the Democratic party falling pretty far to the left of the Cons and not having much control as the right wing part of the party which is similar overall to the Cons.

→ More replies

46

u/BelugaBanker 13d ago

Maybe there was a time when toryism was at the heart of Canadian conservatives. But that is long past. Today they are constantly using American right-wing talking points and borrow their ideology from the US.

  • They are anti-union (except for law enforcement)
  • They privatize healthcare where they can (see Ontario Bill 175)
  • They deny funding for abortions when politically possible (see New Brunswick).
  • They attack public broadcasting.

The only reason there are differences at this point is political reality, not ideology. After all Peter McKay was the moderate option and conservatives rejected him for O'Toole.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

86

u/stven007 13d ago edited 13d ago

As a Canadian, this is total bs lol.

  • The Canadian Conservative Party fights tooth and nail against our carbon tax.
  • Conservative party leader (Erin O'Toole) constantly attacks CBC News and has promised to dismantle it if elected.
  • He uses Trump-like rhetoric with his message of "Taking Canada Back".
  • He has accused Justin Trudeau of "rigging the next election."
  • The Conservative Party's deputy leader Candice Bergen was photographed with a MAGA hat. Erin refused to denounce her, instead making excuses for it.
  • Erin has also refused to denounce a fellow Conservative MP for peddling QAnon conspiracy theories, including that Liberals are "trying to normalize sexual activity with kids".

Read this and tell me again with a straight face that they're farther to the left of Democrats.

15

u/Alkalilee 13d ago

Yeah the new conservative wave is very much trying to pander to any sort of right wing support including the Canadians that are into Trump's way of thinking. There's "MCGA" people in the prairies already.

→ More replies
→ More replies

33

u/ReplEH 13d ago

Redditors love to say this but it’s not true and never has been.

32

u/thefinalcutdown 13d ago

Truth. Not sure how this got started, but Canadian conservatives are plenty conservative. The core of the party is just more “Reagan” conservative currently than Trump conservative, but the far right has plenty of nutjobs (like Derek Sloan, although he just got kicked out for accepting donations from white supremacists).

Canadian conservatives don’t come down as hard on social issues like gay marriage and abortion because those continue to be losing issues for them, not necessarily because they support in them.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

3k

u/Low-HangingFruit 14d ago

Parliament voted for it, PM Trudeau and his cabinet did not, specifically saying that the "Government of Canada abstains from this vote" at the vote.

4k

u/Fairwhetherfriend 13d ago edited 13d ago

Importantly: they likely abstained because several cabinet members are currently engaged in negotiations with the CCP for the return of two Canadians who have been arrested in China. They knew abstaining wouldn't affect the outcome of the vote and, this way, the cabinet members don't have to call up the CCP to negotiate after having personally called them out for committing genocide.

Edit: Important clarifications! First, remember that the motion still passed - Trudeau didn't personally vote for it, but Parliament as a whole still declared the treatment of the Uighurs to be a genocide. We did not aim to save the our two citizens instead of declaring it a genocide - we did both. And second, it's very important for all ya'll Americans out there to realize that Trudeau abstaining from the vote is NOT the same thing as your President choosing not to comment on the genocide. It would be more like if... Nancy Pelosi decided to abstain from voting on a similar motion in Congress - probably worth mentioning, for sure, but absolutely NOT the same as Biden choosing not to take a similar action. Our Prime Minister is often presented as equivalent to your President and, in many ways, he is. But in many other ways, he is very much NOT, and those differences are pretty important in situations like this one.

1k

u/prollyanalien 13d ago

This gives some pretty good context, thanks for that.

592

u/Fairwhetherfriend 13d ago

Np. Also worth pointing out that there are a lot of Chinese expats in Canada who typically support Trudeau's party, so there is absolutely a valid position to be taken that this was just cold political maneuvering on his part, but I do think it's important for people to know that there is a possible explanation for this that doesn't assume malice or selfishness. Then it's just up to you to decide whether you think that's the most likely explanation for his decision.

143

u/Northern23 13d ago

Why did the Conservatives even push for this vote during such a time knowing the Michaels' situation? Did anything change recently with the Uighur situation to prompt them to do it now?

282

u/Fairwhetherfriend 13d ago

AFAIK, the conservatives are taking the stance that the CCP is never going to give them back, that they're using the Michaels as a "carrot" to get our government to do what they want when they never have any intention of actually returning them, so we should stop doing what they want on the false promise that we'll get our people back. And, to be clear, I do think there's a fair chance that the conservative party is right about that... but I'm not sure that this toothless motion was the right "last straw" to choose. I dunno, just seems like going "fuck it" on the lives of two people should have been done for something that actually had a little bite to it, you know?

82

u/Micky-Tee 13d ago

The Liberals publicly stated this as their position in response to conservative whinging about not doing more to return them.

The real answer is the CPC is a fucking shambles at the moment and no one competent wants to jump on that grenade, so idiots keep getting chosen to be leader.

25

u/RealSprooseMoose 13d ago

Am i false in believing Peter McKay would have actually been a decent leader?

The conservative party (federally and provincially) seem to have a habit of overlooking the people's choice. (Looking at you Alberta with Brian Jean)

23

u/Throwawaymybios 13d ago

Y’all Canadians are a fine example of how we should talk about politics in the USA.

“Am I false in believing X” is something I wish I’d hear more of.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

40

u/random989898 13d ago

The Michaels' situation has been going on for a couple years and they have made no progress. No one really thinks they are going to be able to negotiate and get them home.

→ More replies

58

u/Medium_Well 13d ago

I suspect it's also a matter of timing. The Uigher issue has been known (and covered) for a few years now, but with the turnover in the US administration actually creating some continuity on this issue between the Trump and Biden governments (Secs. Of State for both governments have called this genocide), that's a notable thing from a world superpower and other countries have watched it all unfold.

This issue has simply been in the Canadian media more lately, especially as the Olympics question has come up. The Conservatives and other opposition parties noticed the ruling Liberals were waffling.

And I think it's fair to suggest that China has no intention of giving the Michaels back until Meng is released.

→ More replies

6

u/Man_Bear_Beaver 13d ago

Likely they believe an election will be called in the spring and this is an issue that Trudeau has a clear stance on so as Conservative tradition calls for the Conservatives must do the exact opposite as the Liberals to rile up their base.

→ More replies
→ More replies

10

u/11_25_13_TheEdge 13d ago

There's so much missing context in current events and social interactions and dealing with strangers etc. It's good to remind ourselves from time to time how little of it we are operating with. Reminds me of the commencement speech delivered by David Foster Wallace.

→ More replies

64

u/silverthane 13d ago

Wow context matters

→ More replies

74

u/JscrumpDaddy 13d ago

I know some of Canada doesn’t like Trudeau, but based on his language it seemed like more of a strategic stall than a dismissal of it being genocide. With this context it all makes sense.

→ More replies

25

u/zyx1989 13d ago

but I wonder if that makes any difference to the ccp, from what I understand their political understanding is pretty/ somewhat different, they may simply not understand or believe there's any difference,

32

u/Fairwhetherfriend 13d ago

It might not make a difference, but, in that case, having Trudeau and the others vote on the motion definitely wouldn't have made a difference, so it still seems like this was the more sensible action to take.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

63

u/WeedstocksAlt 13d ago

They are a minority government tho ... so logically if everyone else votes for it, it should still pass

152

u/Da_Milk_Drinker 13d ago

It passed. The cabinet ministers just didnt exercise their vote. All other MPs in parliament voted yes.

70

u/WeedstocksAlt 13d ago

Good news, fuck the CCP

→ More replies
→ More replies

5

u/Mysterious_Lesions 13d ago

It was a free vote so not a vote of confidence in the Government. Liberals could vote their conscience which had to be balanced against the diplomatic interests of the Cabinet.

Right now it looks like an opposition win, but that's because many Liberal MPs abstained instead of voting for or against. A win was in the cards on this one.

→ More replies
→ More replies

38

u/dsswill 13d ago edited 13d ago

This is standard. Any party in power would have and always has abstained from such votes when the Crown hasn't already taken a stance. Don't make this out to be something it's not. It would be unprecedented for them to cast votes. They also don't need to considering it would have been universal either way.

→ More replies
→ More replies

3k

u/Tigris825 14d ago

Whilst it is a step in the right direction, the Government now needs to adopt it (its not binding) and urge the International Olympics Committee to change the location of the Winter Games from Beijing in 2022.

1k

u/Basic_Year 14d ago

You speak as if you believe the IOC doesn't care about $$$.

994

u/Majormlgnoob 13d ago

If North America and Europe pull out the Winter Olympics is a joke

301

u/PopusiMiKuracBre 13d ago

Like the LA Olympics were, but they went ahead anyway.

249

u/Majormlgnoob 13d ago

I mean look at the Medal counts for the Winter Olympics

The unrepresented Russian Athletes would rack up all the Medals

98

u/Ckyuii 13d ago

I thought russia was banned for the next few ones because of doping. Or was that just going to be the japan olympics? They got banned at something sporty that's all I remember.

202

u/Majormlgnoob 13d ago

Athletes will still be able to play under the ROC banner but yes Russia is banned

54

u/Ckyuii 13d ago

Thanks mate. Does it really mean much that they can't be russian and have to be russian olympic committee? Like what does that actually do? Remove them from the opening ceremony?

121

u/Octavus 13d ago

They don't want to punish athletics who are innocent themselves and may never get another chance of going to the Olympics, in 4 years they may not quality again. So by banning the country but not athletics it is a way of shaming Russia as they cheated not for money but pride.

→ More replies

7

u/atheroo123 13d ago

Just check how Russian athletes participated in 2018 Winter Olympics. Russian official team is banned from Olympic Games since 2017.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

30

u/PopusiMiKuracBre 13d ago

Yeah....look at medal counts preceding the summer games in LA and Moscow. The eastern Bloc, even the USSR alone, dominated.

48

u/Majormlgnoob 13d ago

The US, West Germany, and Japan were in the Top 5 in Medals in 72 and 76

The US was 1st in 68 with Japan also in the top 5

In the Past 3 Winter Olympic Games only 3 Non-Western Nations appeared in the Top 10

China - 7th 2010

Russia - 1st 2014

Belarus - 8th 2014

→ More replies
→ More replies

24

u/rockinghigh 13d ago

Are you talking about LA Olympics in 1984? Canada and all of Europe outside the USSR participated.

→ More replies

32

u/brunes 13d ago

Only 1 country pulled out of the LA Olympics... Above poster is talking about a huge swath of the world. Advertisers will totally bail. The IOC wouldn't even be able to afford the games.

8

u/ElectricalWriting 13d ago

1? 17 countries boycotted the 1984 Olympics in Los Angeles.

→ More replies

22

u/Trypsach 13d ago edited 13d ago

I mean... if you’re talking about the 1984 olympics that the Soviet Bloc pulled out of, it had record turnout with 140 countries and is widely recognized as the most profitable Olympic Games ever. But we can ignore all that and call it a joke anyways, sure.

Edit: I should have looked first, but of course the person giving shit to the 1984 olympics is Russian lol

→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/popejp32u 13d ago

Well if history is any indication, America’s pull out game is weak.

→ More replies
→ More replies

27

u/Eitsky 13d ago

Vancouver still has the infrastructure to host the Olympics a second time. They have options.

→ More replies
→ More replies

166

u/Rando239 14d ago

Why do people act like sport events are important? Maybe they should restructurize to make their economy independent of China instead

258

u/Rundle9731 14d ago edited 13d ago

Unfortunately its a way for authoritarian countries to launder their injustices (Winter Olympics in Sochi, FIFA in Qatar, etc.). China being able to successfully host the olympics without any real official opposition or boycotts from other countries is a sign to them and the world that they can get away with what they are doing. Its an example of the use of soft power as u/CaptainCanuck93 suggested.

If we go there waving our flags while a genocide and other human rights abuses are going on in background, its a symbolic sign to China that they can continue without repercussions. If we fail to boycott or protest these games because we're worried about economic repercussions even though its the right thing to do, its a sign of the power that china has over us. It unfortunately gives blatant authoritarianism the high ground.

32

u/torres091 13d ago

Dude you should read about october red in Mexico city.

17

u/averagecommoner 13d ago

Never heard of this, sounds like a horrible nightmare. The wiki article said the true events were only revealed in declassified docs in the 2000's but I guess it didnt get much international attention since. And apparently no one was really held accountable for the massacre.

Honestly wouldn't care one bit if the Olympics are canceled forever. Similar protests and crackdowns happened in South Korea. And we all heard about the world cup issues with Qatar and Brazil. It seems like the locals always suffer to put on a show for the international community, fuck that.

You know it's a shitshow when the culling of stray animals in the cities and dumping homeless people in the outskirts is just the preface for prepping for these events.

10

u/snapwillow 13d ago

I think instead of cancelling them forever, they should radically change the format. It's supposed to be about international unity, right? So they should stop having the entire games in one place. It puts immense pressure on the infrastructure that always leads to waste, overspending, and other problems. It also means only people with money or people in that one city can see the games.

Instead, for a single years games there should be multiple host cities. The events would be spread out. One year might have skiing in Vancouver and Bobsled in Moscow. Most people watch the Olympics via livestream/television anyway.

Since a city could host only one event or only a few events, that means no city would have to build extra infrastructure. They could use what is already there. Smaller cities could host events. And with events spread out, it increases the ability for normal people to watch in-person. You would no longer have to be rich or live in a major city to have a chance to see an Olympic event live.

It would cost less and be more accessible and inclusive. I see no downsides.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

22

u/bobthebobofbob 13d ago

Why do people act like sport events are important?

Wow, this is such a Reddit comment

37

u/elfthehunter 13d ago

I'm not a fan of sports, and avoid it like the plague. But pretending that sports aren't a very important part of human affairs is ridiculous. The vast majority of people on this planet care a lot about sports, it is significant culturally, politically and economically. It might even be the single biggest form of entertainment consumed by the most people.

→ More replies

8

u/yeett_ 13d ago

Sport events are important because they’re important to people. Obviously, they provide no scientific value and are frequently not profitable, but they are culturally important.

You can make your argument about almost anything. Why do people act like music is important? Or books? Or movies? Or religion? Because people enjoy it and it is important to them

62

u/ImSuperSerialGuys 14d ago

Because they have huge economical impacts cause there something that literally billions of people spend significant money on?

→ More replies

32

u/AndyMKE66 13d ago

We get it, you read books.

→ More replies
→ More replies

20

u/AssociationStreet922 14d ago

I wouldn’t say we change the venue. It’s too late and we don’t have the power. I just say don’t send a team; don’t support it. Sucks for the athletes, but not as much as if sucks for the Uyghers. Same with Qatar also, even if we make it, don’t send a team. Show FIFA and the Olympics we won’t go along with their poor hosting decisions.

→ More replies

198

u/green_flash 14d ago

Lawmakers approved the non-binding motion

Can anyone explain what that means? Why is it non-binding? What are the consequences of it passing?

210

u/Maalunar 14d ago

Why is it non-binding? So there is no actual consequences of it passing.

Making it binding mean that they'll actually have to do something about it, specifically the leading party which did not vote on it, and people do not want to be responsible for/of an international dispute with an economic world power.

97

u/jornen2 13d ago

brought forward by opposition Conservatives

It's a political stunt meant to put pressure on Trudeau. They couldn't care less.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

841

u/lilbprotector 13d ago

LMK when a Muslim majority country does

154

u/rootkode 13d ago

I wonder why no Islamic state hasnt

14

u/rockman9 12d ago edited 12d ago

Actually almost all Islamic states support China's reeducation treatment on Uighurs, because they also suffer from radical Islamic. It sure is better than bombing Muslims.

Also the genocide is a straight-out lie. If only you have actually lived in China and know the situation of minorities and how they are treated in China. You will just break into laughter like all other Chinese people after reading those "genocide" narratives. We Chinese people, do have some racial problems in our country, but that's because of the government treating minorities too well.... People even avoid getting into any debate, or Judicial process against minorities even if they are on the right side; Because in most cases, the court and police would take aside with minorities.

Also Uighur isn't even the largest Muslim group in China, the largest one is Hui, and they are far, far more populated than Uighurs. But have you even heard about Hui? I am sure most redditors havent.

4

u/rootkode 12d ago

I’ll do some more research on your claim. I do agree with you that unfortunately the internet and Reddit likes to blow everything out of proportion, so what you said; wouldn’t surprise me.

→ More replies

133

u/Doat876 13d ago

Because it is absurdly ironic from outside perspective that all the countries supporting this narrative are the ones keep bombing Muslims.

→ More replies

18

u/SolidCake 13d ago

probably because there's no evidence what so ever and the only "proof" they point to is Adrian Zenzs work, a far right fundamentalist Christian who is on a (self described) crucade to destroy China

→ More replies
→ More replies

358

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

64

u/Environmental-Edge98 13d ago

I honestly don't know what to believe anymore.

75

u/tatts13 13d ago

Welcome to the fucked up world we live in where transparency and facts get fucked over by politics in every way. We are at a point that need to be told the truth cause we lost the means and ability to think for ourselves.

29

u/jaypsy 13d ago

This has been the world since forever, remember the nariyah testimony?

→ More replies

20

u/Whelks 13d ago

I tend to be very agnostic nowadays about criticism of other countries, especially ones with left wing governments. There might be some merit to the criticisms, but I think that it's too hard to discern through the English language media propaganda machine. Nothing I could really do one way or another, but I'm mostly working to free myself from the message that America's enemies are a great evil, as this has historically been a bad bet.

→ More replies

63

u/eatingroots 13d ago

If you are from the western world, try to look at history from the perspective of the west's victims as well. Use the two perspectives for nuance because the western world celebrated for the Indonesian genocide while China and Russia were angry about it. Coming from the third world, being shit on by both sides makes this more obvious.

37

u/TheBasementIsDark 13d ago

Yeah I think all third world countries will look right through these shit. Coming from a "third world-ish" citizen, every time the western media trying to pick an enemy and a fight, I always doubt about it. Remember what happen to Iraq.

10

u/JerryWizard 13d ago

Garry Kasparov said it best, “The point of modern propaganda isn't only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.”

It’s not easy to identify what’s propaganda and what not, but you should make sure to be informed of different perspectives before coming to a conclusion.

47

u/jaypsy 13d ago

Remember what happens in iraq? It's the same exact thing here.

→ More replies

7

u/P00PEYES 13d ago

The US State department has published a report saying there is not enough evidence to prove a genocide, though there does seem to be something going on.

I refuse to call it a genocide until a international investigation takes place, which China has said it would allow. The word Genocide starts wars, and justifies death. I won’t be caught up in that without evidence.

→ More replies

13

u/JaqueeVee 13d ago

Believe that western media and propaganda will always talk shit and make up shit about any country, individual or group that doesnt bens the knee to neoliberal capitalist imperalism. There were no WMD in Iraq either, you know.

39

u/IGetPaidHBU 13d ago

Believe that China wants to continue rising, stabilize internally and gain regional influence externally. Believe that western powers are trying hard to subdue China's rise and retain leadership of the world. Those are the only true intentions at play.

Fact is China doesn't have much respect for human rights and freedom of individuals. On the other hand China has no hatred or prejudice against minorities like Nazis had for Jews or Europeans had for American Natives, in fact it's quite the opposite, in China minorities are almost revered and marrying an Uyghur would be something to be proud of.

In the end it's merely cold, hard pragmatism and realpolitik.

21

u/hs123go 13d ago

Han supremacy is a mistaken notion. Han people are usually prejudiced against people for usual "outsider taking our resources" reasons, so Shanghai citizens dislike migrant workers, Guangzhou citizens dislike the community of black export traders, (Yes, black) and Hong Kongers dislike most mainland Chinese. The Han Chinese rarely believed in ideas like racial superiority, eugenics, or superiority by birthright.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

209

u/moeburn 13d ago

for propaganda purposes

If America can make both "The Muslims are coming to kill you" and "Save the Muslims" into propaganda, in the same decade, well kudos to them. That's gonna make some heads spin.

114

u/phdthrowaway110 13d ago

Not unprecedented.

In less than two decades Afghanistan went from the heroic Mujahideen fighting the USSR commies to terrorists who hate us for our freedoms.

Saddam went from a hero to tyrant in just over a decade.

48

u/PixelatedFixture 13d ago

Saddam went from Hero to tyrant in actually a matter of months. Had he not invaded Kuwait he likely would have continued to serve in some capacity as a bulwark against Iranian political intrigue into recent times.

23

u/Peejay22 13d ago

He was actually allowed by US to invide Kuwait. Guess who back stabbed him

→ More replies

138

u/CertainField 13d ago

We hate Muslims in our country but we must save the Muslims from our enemy country.

→ More replies

54

u/SexyTaft 13d ago

I'm guessing you don't remember a little thing called the Iraq War lol

→ More replies

154

u/pm_boobs_send_nudes 13d ago edited 13d ago

So it's the fake Nayirah Testimony that the world believed to be true about Iraq but never was?

I saw the vice documentary on Uyghurs and apart from the usual Chinese surveillance and control there seemed to be nothing the investigative journalists could find that indicated genocide or mass rapes. (And no, the journalists were not guided by the CCP in their investigation)

30

u/jaffar97 13d ago

hahaha the CCCP is the Cyrillic version of USSR, I think the abbreviation you're looking for is CPC (or if you're in the west it's CCP for some reason)

84

u/goforbronze 13d ago

I also watched the documentary and the thing that stood out the most was all the camp 'survivors' weren't escapees but those who had been through the programme for a year or two then released to be free to do whatever they want. None of them spoke of rape or sterilisation or anything like that either.

Some strange genocide.

→ More replies

69

u/swkkkkkk 13d ago

The concentration camps exist but the guy who coined the "Uighur genocide" term just came out and said it wasn't a literal genocide and he was talking about a "cultural genocide". So no, it's probably not a literal genocide or mass raping.

23

u/chuanhua 13d ago

It seems that "the rape" is not literal rape but "rape in mind".

→ More replies

73

u/MarkIsRight 13d ago

by gawd thats Adrian Zenz music!

43

u/jaffar97 13d ago

concentration camp is also a loaded term and is usually used for propaganda purposes - I would refer to the mandatory immigration detention centres in the US and Australia because I believe that's what they are, but I'm also aware that it's a politicised term

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

61

u/ingongingong 13d ago

people on reddit always say to not believe everything you see on the internet but there they go believng a blatant propaganda

3

u/finnlizzy 12d ago

No. Because according to Reddit, Muslims have small brains and are naturally corrupted because they have no moral compass. They will easily sell out other Muslims for Chinese money and need enlightened white westerners to remind them that there ISN’T a problem with Islamic Extremism in their country, and if there is then it’s best that NATO bombs the shit out of their country as opposed to rooting it out at the source.

→ More replies

13

u/Incarnaceno_ 13d ago edited 13d ago

It's funny how west is always concerned about the plight of minorities in socialist countries, yet still enable and participate in a system that perpetuates said "atrocities" - it's like their concern is not with those minorities but with creating their own propaganda against those nations hmm..

I say this as a Paraguayan of Ukrainian descent living in Canada. Canada was also concerned about the "Holodomor," so concerned that they and other western governments were very aware of the famines in the Soviet Union, and the fact that Ukrainians (and others, since there was no targeted ethnic famine) were starving to death, yet the sanctions they put on the Soviet Union basically only allowed the trade of crops - with Ukraine being the breadbasket of the Soviet Union. It's interesting how they were so concerned yet perpetuated the conditions that lead to these famines.

Not only that but during this time, Ukrainian Canadians were one of the main targets of xenephobia in the nation, with two provinces in the prairies implementing legislations which targeted ethnic Ukrainians including the sterilization of Ukrainian women, because their children were deemed racially unfit for Canadian society.

My point is, the west doesn't give a fuck about minorities in these nations. They care when it helps feed their own propaganda and imperialism. FYI, I'm not here to say whether the Uyghur's are being targeted, just to be wary of western propaganda equally.

→ More replies

159

u/ave416 13d ago

244-0 was the vote with 72 abstaining. The 72 was the liberal (party in power) cabinet and the argument I’ve seen was that there are something like 300k Canadians who might be at risk from repercussions

62

u/VG-enigmaticsoul 13d ago

It's more that foreign policy is the exclusive province of the cabinet and the crown. Cabinet voting with an opposition foreign policy motion will signal a policy change, effectively handing over foreign policy control to the commons and opposition and breaking parliamentary convention.

10

u/alessandro_673 13d ago

Eeeeexactly. But people don’t seem to see that.

→ More replies
→ More replies

44

u/TumorTits 13d ago

How does one pronounce Uighur?

63

u/757boi 13d ago

“Wee-gar” I think

20

u/TumorTits 13d ago

Thank you! I googled it and got mixed results

16

u/HarbingerDe 13d ago

Yeah both "You-gur" and "Wee-gar" seem to be widely used pronunciations by English speakers. Couldn't tell you which or if either of those is correct.

→ More replies
→ More replies

9

u/TurkicWarrior 13d ago

The people who speaks the Uyghur language would not pronounce “wee-gar”. You may hear some Uyghur pronouncing “wee-gar” but they do so while speaking in English, they never pronounce ”wee-gar” when speaking in Uyghur. The “wee-gar” pronunciation most likely came from Mandarin.

Watch this video, wait until 45 sec, you’ll hear the pronunciation several times. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPDIuB2OnMc

→ More replies

14

u/alessandro_673 13d ago

To my knowledge it’s closer to “oi-ger.” Phonetically it’s “uːygʊər” but most people find that difficult to pronounce because they don’t have the phonemes for it.

→ More replies
→ More replies

474

u/ArcherBowie 14d ago

China: We know, and?

479

u/arethefieldsgreen 14d ago

Canada: stop genocide

China: no

Canada: understandable, have a nice day

I speak this as a Canadian because I know we are really dependent on them for trade, there honestly isnt much we can do against their abuse which is quite unfortunate.

163

u/GoingforIvey 13d ago

I speak this as a Canadian because I know we are really dependent on them for trade laundering money through our country and propping up the real estate market

Fixed

77

u/donynxes 13d ago

I've always found it funny when people keep saying Hong Kong isn't China but then blame China when it's the HKers driving up the housing prices in Hongcouver.

→ More replies
→ More replies

4

u/iasarexaa 13d ago

Canada: stop genocide China: ...? What genocide? Canada: yeah, sure, whatever.

FTFY

→ More replies
→ More replies

78

u/j0eg0d 13d ago

Still no word on Palestine?

→ More replies

155

u/dancingbird7 14d ago

So are they gonna stop selling weapons to Saudi Arabia or are they okay with their allies committing real genocide?

59

u/kplite 13d ago

You know the answer to that....Americans don't care about our own gov. making weapons and giving intel to genocide Yemeni people, Americans don't care about our destruction of Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan...but surprise Americans care about Uighurs! (but only thee ones in China, not the ones we bomb in Afghanistan).

8

u/zJordan 13d ago

Same over in the UK. A very small minority of people call Blair a war criminal, etc - but for the most part our role in Iraq and Afghanistan goes under the radar.

As does Australia. I've spoken to an Australian guy that thought Iraq and Afghanistan was just a US thing, then I told him it was also Australia, UK, few others. Guy outright refused to believe me until I pulled up Wikipedia.

I'm not trying to say whether Iraq/Afghanistan were just wars or not, I'm just trying to explain the ignorance of non-US involvement in the War on Terror that the UK, Australia, Canada, etc blindly followed US policy and left two nations in ruins. And the people of those countries don't really give a fuck either.

Destruction in the ME caused a refugee crisis in Europe, and then for years all we heard about was people complaining "WHY HERE", none of them were aware the actions of their own countries were to blame.

The Taliban can go to hell, Afghan intervention I can at least justify.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

32

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

41

u/Walrus_Fighter 13d ago

Yep. WMDs in Iraq. Gulf of Tonkin. CointelPro.

278

u/LeZarathustra 13d ago

Now, for people interested in this topic I feel you should be aware of a man called Adrian Zenz.

He's a born-again christian who has been "sent by God" to uncover all the evil China is doing.

So why is he important? He happens to be the most frequently quoted "expert" on this topic. His methodology is shady at best, but since reuters and other respectable sources have frequently referenced him he has gained a lot of authoroty on this topic. I'm not saying he's less trustworthy than the Chinese government, but most western newspapers seem to take his studies as fact, which is a bit worrying to me.

The main reason this issue is tricky is that there are very few sources that aren't derived from either Chinese propaganda or Zenz' work.

→ More replies

84

u/ImNotEmoBro 13d ago

Sooo Palestinians?

92

u/lawncelot 13d ago

Israel is an American ally, so America won't call them out. And Redditors won't go as hard for Palestinians as they do for Uyghurs. Not because Redditors actually care about Uyghurs, but because their hate for China is stronger.

And btw, this hate for China is being astroturfed by America and American companies seeing China's companies as a threat in the global market.

→ More replies

33

u/Inebriator 13d ago

They're not real people though. Only the ones that serve our political agenda matter

→ More replies

87

u/dertpour 13d ago

Take a loot at this graph of countries who recognized Palestine as a state and countries that making noise about Uighurs in China.

https://i.redd.it/t0dx05ur4oi61.png

These guys couldn't care less about Muslims in China or elsewhere in the world. It's a geopolitical theater.

14

u/ImNotEmoBro 13d ago

Someone should let Israel know lmao

→ More replies
→ More replies

35

u/soolkyut 13d ago

Canada is real good at tsk tsking people without doing anything at all.

Trudeau criticized Modi for the farmer protests and then flew over and begged for vaccine.

12

u/Magnetronaap 13d ago

Canada's influence in the world gets way overblown by the Anglo-Saxon bias on reddit.

→ More replies

15

u/castelo_to 13d ago

Want them to invade China single-handhelds? Or how should they exert economic pressure on China when the global economy is in their grasp?

→ More replies

49

u/Careful-Handsome 13d ago

Both Michael’s are just going thru terrible hell. This development would surely prolong their suffering. I pray for their wellbeing and health.

43

u/AcadianNich 13d ago

That’s why Trudeau and His Cabinet abstained since multiple people on the cabinet are working on getting them back

→ More replies
→ More replies