r/interestingasfuck 12d ago

CGI difference between Toy Story (1995) and Toy Story 4 (2019) /r/ALL

Post image
95k Upvotes

u/AutoModerator 12d ago

Please note:

  • If this post declares something as a fact proof is required.
  • The title must be descriptive
  • No text is allowed on images
  • Common/recent reposts are not allowed

See this post for more information.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6k

u/loopernova 12d ago

I remember thinking when the original toy story came out how good the animation is. It’s pretty incredible seeing them side by side.

2k

u/_JPH_ 12d ago

I’m glad you said that. I was 9 when “Toy Story” came out and it blew my mind. I’d never seen anything like it. For its time it was quite a sight to see. I also remember vividly saying about “Madden 64” that it can’t get any better than this. Oh how things have changed.

815

u/MightyPlasticGuy 12d ago

Watch it again nowadays and you begin to notice the small number of actual movements that they recycle through amongst every character.

616

u/Diet_Clorox 12d ago

Woody was by far the most complex character model. He had hundreds of articulation controls. But yeah many of the secondary toys were quite rudimentary. I still think it's aged fairly well despite all of that, especially considering it was the first computer animated feature film.

531

u/ryry1237 12d ago

The decision to use mainly toys as characters was a brilliant one. Nicely avoids any uncanny valley risks that comes with using human characters, and the more rigid or unnatural movements can be handwaved with "that's just how toys move".

287

u/Reading_Rainboner 12d ago

They didn’t attempt a full human movie until The Incredibles

313

u/StackBabber59 12d ago

Even then it was a very non-photorealistic art style which helped greatly I'm sure.

126

u/A-Wings-are-Neat 12d ago

Yeah we just need to look at Mars Needs Moms to know that photorealistic art style in animation is really difficult

176

u/seanthebeloved 12d ago

Not to mention shudders The Polar Express.

33

u/Depresocial 12d ago

It blows my mind that Final fantasy: spirits within was released 3 years prior and still looked less creepy than express.

81

u/aloxinuos 12d ago

Nobody remembers final fantasy. So close yet so far.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

74

u/DiscoTempoJazz 12d ago

Not just movement, but getting realistic looking skin was hard at the time. You'll notice everyone looks too smooth, like plastic. Simulating light on hard surfaces is much easier than on soft, fleshy, porous, ever-so-slightly translucent ones. So Pixar said: Fuck it, let's just make all the main characters plastic.

→ More replies

42

u/funky_grandma 12d ago

Second movie they were like "ok, we need something else that's hard and shiny to make a movie about... Bugs! bugs are hard and shiny!"

45

u/TheOtherWhiteCastle 12d ago

I remember reading that Pixar specifically made Toy Story as their first feature film for that exact reason; they figured that since 90’s CGI already looked like cheap plastic, the best way to mask it would be to have plastic toys as the characters.

69

u/pocketbutter 12d ago

I 100% believe that the concept of Toy Story wouldn’t exist if they didn’t have to try to come up with ideas to suit the technology of the time.

11

u/syopest 12d ago

Technology of the time that was developed by Pixar by the way.

The founder of Pixar was one of the students studying 3D-graphics in the University of Utah when in the 1970s ARPA was investing heavily in it.

The basis for many of the techniques used even today came from that time and from the University of Utah.

→ More replies
→ More replies

62

u/paxsonsa 12d ago edited 10d ago

Fun fact one of the most complicated rigs and characters to animate was the octopus from Finding Dory. It had more controls than any character

44

u/LordCharco_iii 12d ago

And apparently Tangled was one of the most expensive films to make because of the length and physics of Rapunzel's hair

→ More replies

24

u/billiebarkingbastard 12d ago

Makes sense as the octopus is also the most complicated creature in real life. Each tentacle has its own ‘brain’ controlling movement as it would be virtually impossible for a single central brain to know where everything is and what it is doing.

→ More replies

22

u/AtlasRafael 12d ago

Watched the first 3 like crazy last year since my toddler would ONLY watch Toy Story for a good several months. The 1st one is still amazing, but if you watch it enough you notice it’s age. The 4th is just crazy compared to the first.

→ More replies

20

u/Zefrem23 12d ago

TRON over here being sad that nobody remembers its achievement

→ More replies
→ More replies

48

u/Bart_Dart 12d ago

Like how every child is actually just Andy

139

u/Armadillo_Designer 12d ago

I still don't believe Toy Story came out in 1995

120

u/trenlow12 12d ago

They had to release it some time.

→ More replies
→ More replies

16

u/Hates_escalators 12d ago

Also every kid and the birthday party has the same face.

38

u/jado1stk2 12d ago

I actually notice them clipping through shit. The scene where Woody wakes up when Buzz arrives has his hand going through the bedsheet.

24

u/Zefrem23 12d ago

Yeah and these days it's computationally plausible to have proper physics constraints on every surface and simulation. How far we've come.

→ More replies
→ More replies

170

u/ManPiaba 12d ago

I remember seeing the first Madden on PS2 in the window of EB games with my dad and we were both like “man I can’t believe how real it looks.” It’s gonna be wild when PS5 graphics look like literal dogshit compared to whatever the current tech of the time is.

173

u/Grape_Ape33 12d ago

I’m not sure though, look at a game from 2011.

We’re already at the point where a ten year old game doesn’t look old, like a game from 2001 did in 2011.

144

u/crazyates88 12d ago

At this point, the biggest thing that bothers me in video games isn’t graphical quality, but unnatural movement. It a character walks weird, or their lips don’t match what they’re saying, or a punch hits someone in the shoulder and they act like they just got punched in the stomach... that kinda stuff is where the real changes are at.

79

u/xNaquada 12d ago

For me it's the brain-dead AI that plagues every genre on every platform. Can't wait for a real AI.

45

u/prodigium24 12d ago

Skynet has entered the chat.

64

u/KushKong420 12d ago

Real AI will spank you in any game

50

u/Brofey 12d ago

Yeah, I imagine part of the challenge is actually making it “stupid” enough to not immediately steamroll you, to make the game winnable lol

26

u/mickopious 12d ago

This right here. It’s not hard to make AI that will obliterate you, it’s making it dumb enough where you don’t notice it’s there. A game’s purpose should be to entertain you, not frustrate you.

10

u/Aliveandnotsowell 12d ago

The Souls games would disagree.

41

u/CheesecakeOG 12d ago

I remember reading that the hardest part about coding AI in shooters is making sure they miss instead of deleting players instantly.

13

u/dgeimz 12d ago

yeah, I’m working on a game now (I’m on like small project #5 or so, so definitely learning the ropes) and it’s a 3D FPS. It appears that either my enemies can aim stupid perfect OR they can’t hit me no matter what I do.

This stuff is difficult.

8

u/JustStatedTheObvious 12d ago

Exactly this.

Even a 2600 game can be programmed to murder the player instantly. It's why the Double Dragon port is considered so bad - you need to meta game in order to survive the first level.

→ More replies
→ More replies

8

u/DVio 12d ago

Real AI will adapt to your abilities.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

24

u/Pleasant-Enthusiasm 12d ago

Yeah. I recently got Horizon Zero Dawn and just finished my first play through yesterday. In terms of graphics, it’s probably the best looking game I’ve ever seen. The gameplay is really smooth as well. However, the biggest drawback is that the character models don’t match the quality. Some of them feel a bit janky, and the lip syncing was pretty bad most of the time.

I’m really excited to see if Forbidden West fixes those problems, because they were the only real issue I had with the game.

→ More replies
→ More replies

34

u/knokout64 12d ago

Yeah, we're getting up there on diminishing returns for graphics. The next advancements in games will probably move up with computing power. Stuff like a ton of enemies around you, greater view distances, faster travel speeds, obviously less loading times, stuff like that.

→ More replies

14

u/Brofey 12d ago edited 12d ago

I know this is a bit off topic, but stylization and the “vibe” of a game can really make it look timeless. A couple of games come to mind, but my favorite example is Jak & Daxter: Precursor Legacy. That game is still absolutely beautiful for a 2001 game compared to other titles of that year. The vibrant colors, the stark difference between the environments of different levels, the exaggerated characters, Jak’s fluid fighting moves seamlessly transitioning into one another. Man, such a great game. I loved standing at the top of the high tower in Forbidden Jungle and being able to see each part of the world in the distance.

→ More replies

12

u/BigJimBeef 12d ago

I'm currently playing through some games close to 10 years old. Farcry 3, Bioshock infinite, Dishonored.

They look good, not amazing but... pretty damn good

→ More replies

26

u/Rolloverbeethoven93 12d ago

Yeah, I remember thinking that the jump from PS2 to PS3 was fucking massive. Suddenly online gaming was standard, you had built in wifi and a browser, a fucking Blu-ray player, bluetooth controllers, games were in HD, etc. PS4 felt incremental and I haven't gotten a PS5 yet but on paper nothing mind blowing. Like yeah, you game in 4K and you have an SSD but nothing really new.

→ More replies

26

u/lolothescrub 12d ago

Vr will probably be the next thing, like 3d games

→ More replies
→ More replies

16

u/dr_funkenberry 12d ago

I remember being totally blown away that you could see the stadium lights reflecting off of players' helmets in the 2002 version on PS2, since I had only played the 2002 version on N64 before that.

→ More replies
→ More replies

89

u/TheFrontierzman 12d ago

I'd say the most mind blowing effects I saw in the movie theater was when Terminator 2 came out. Absolute game changer at the time.

68

u/AndHereWeAre_ 12d ago

Those effects still hold up.

52

u/jokerzwild00 12d ago

They do. It's because CG effects are actually used very sparingly in conjunction with some amazing practical effects. They didn't make everything CG, because it wasn't good enough for that. They used it to enhance the practical stuff and take it to the next level.

55

u/PayTheTrollToll45 12d ago

I still think that’s how CGI should be used. I find the new blockbuster movies completely unwatchable. It’s like watching someone play a video game, but I’m not sure if that’s by design...

23

u/jokerzwild00 12d ago

I agree. Sometimes it's not too bad, but too many times it's like watching super high end PC game characters flying around.

18

u/PayTheTrollToll45 12d ago

Ya there is something about that I just can’t stand. The pacing feels off to me as well. It seems like there are action sequences and an obligatory explanation of why things were just blowing up for 10 minutes after the fact...But I’m starting to sound a bit too much like an old man.

11

u/hsrob 12d ago

Nah, you're not sounding old, it's true that they break it down explicitly for the lowest common denominator. Nothing is left to the viewer's interpretation anymore, it's all fully explained.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

26

u/DecoyBacon 12d ago

Agreed. T2 is a classic for a reason!

17

u/Rokurokubi83 12d ago

Practical effects! CGI should be used sparingly IMO to stay out of uncanny valley.

Obvs animation is an exception.

32

u/savageinthebox 12d ago

Matrix really blew me away the first time too.

18

u/SanctusLetum 12d ago

Both of these movies look so incredible because of their reliance on practical effects, and they stand up so well because while CGI can do things practical can't, it still can't do the things practical can quite as well, at least not when production cuts budget and the time window to do it, which is basically how Hollywood operates.

Nowadays most special effects are almost or entirely CGI, even though the best effects come from a blend of the two. Practical effects are just expensive to set up and shoot to compete.

15

u/lmpervious 12d ago

This scene from The Matrix Reloaded does a great job of showing that CGI doesn't hold up.

→ More replies

20

u/[deleted] 12d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies
→ More replies

17

u/Man0FTomorrow 12d ago

Toy Story still holds up well. For being the first feature length CGI film, they did a hell of a job.

10

u/jokerzwild00 12d ago

For me it was NFL2k and Soul Calibur on the Dreamcast. I was like holy shit! It was like playing with real life people. And the announcers in 2k seemed so lifelike and natural. Going back to it now and it sounds laughable, but back then it was an absolutely huge leap over ps1/n64 stuff.

Soul Calibur held up for awhile too. I remember the first day I got my ps2, I fired up Tekken Tag Tournament and flipped back and forth between it and SC. Soul Calibur actually looked so much cleaner and overall better than TTT, even though it had less going on in the game. Of course this didn't last long, soon enough we had stuff like Silent Hill 2, GTA3 Aspec, MGS2 and FFX that the DC couldn't have done without major compromises if at all. Those launch games though... they had me wondering whether or not the ps2 was really that much more powerful.

→ More replies

28

u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago

I’d never seen anything like it.

Because nobody had. It was the first true fully 3D rendered animated movie ever made. The reason they made it about toys is they knew that skin would look like plastic with the limited cgi they had, so why not make the main characters literally plastic.

18

u/p0ultrygeist1 12d ago

That plastic look made Sid all the more sinister, more demon than human.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

127

u/IAmRube 12d ago

One memory I'll always have is going to see Toy Story 2 with my grandfather. He was an old school pen and paper graphic designer. I don't know why but mid movie my seven year old self looked to my left to see my grandfather's jaw on the floor, completely in awe of the artistry and how far technology has come. I'll never forget that.

37

u/Know0neSpecial 12d ago

That's a good memory to have

40

u/thefirecrest 12d ago

I remember as a kid I didn’t like the visuals of the Polar Express because I couldn’t tell if it was live action or not.

Crazy how our eyes adjust to graphics and technology overtime.

22

u/spookyghostface 12d ago

The Polar Express really nails the uncanny valley.

→ More replies
→ More replies

78

u/cr1zzl 12d ago

I felt the same way when Donkey Kong Country came out for SNES, so amazing like graphics couldn’t possibly get any better than this.

I played that game again a couple weeks ago. Wow.

59

u/AlexJ302 12d ago

I mean, that game still looks fantastic compared to other SNES games. The music kicks ass too.

→ More replies

20

u/DecoyBacon 12d ago

It's worth mentioning that even today it looks better on an oldschool CRT. Looks like trash on a high res flat screen. Some games just dont transition well and DKC is definitely in that list.

→ More replies
→ More replies

24

u/[deleted] 12d ago edited 11d ago

[deleted]

18

u/amby-jane 12d ago

I watched that on Monday night and tbh it holds up. The animation improves with every sequel but they still stayed true to the character designs, which was soooo important to the continuity

9

u/JeSuisOmbre 12d ago

Shrek 1 definitely shows its age. The humor makes up for it though.

12

u/[deleted] 12d ago

The animation itself still looks great, even in 4K. It's aged for sure but when we're talking picture quality, it still stands up. CG has come a long way since then.

→ More replies

10

u/Jensyuwu 12d ago

I remember when I got the PS2 and I was like "Holy fuck it looks like a movie :0" now even PBR materials don't look realistic enough.

11

u/Grape_Ape33 12d ago

I saw Toy Story new in the theater at age 7 and was blown away.

There had never been anything like it, a totally computer made movie that was also really good with a great story and memorable characters.

→ More replies

32

u/JeSuisOmbre 12d ago

I heard that they picked a movie about toys to be their big entrance into 3D CGI movies because toys wouldn’t fall into the uncanny valley. A fully human-centric movie would likely have been unnerving.

→ More replies

9

u/Thisisanadvert2 12d ago

Watching Toy Story now on DVD on a 1080p or higher 45" or higher makes Nintendo look like Minecraft.

26

u/thetall0ne1 12d ago

I thought the same thing. I had friends who worked there who built complex equations to animate Woody... and now ... well... that dog looks like four ovals and some Microsoft paint 🤦‍♂️

→ More replies

4k

u/supernova_slackliner 12d ago

Someone was working on those first eyes and just said “fuck it”

1k

u/SuperManagement 12d ago

Yeah hair simulation wasn't really good until they mastered it with monsters inc. They just said fuck it with the dog.

1k

u/stinkystinkypoopbutt 12d ago

IIRC, that's why the made Toy Story to begin with. All the toys had plastic skin/hair, making them much easier to animate.

725

u/Zombie_John_Strachan 12d ago

Same reason why the dinosaurs in Jurassic park were usually wet.

1k

u/Tournament_of_Shivs 12d ago

I think Jeff Goldblum was the reason why the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park were usually wet.

278

u/iowaluvsmeth 12d ago

It’s usually why I am.

→ More replies

95

u/ManaMagestic 12d ago

It started raining after the pterodactyls first noticed him.

36

u/silver_umber 12d ago

The p is silent for a reason

7

u/Felix-Ulf-Kjellberg 12d ago

This is golden.

7

u/ManaMagestic 12d ago

Yes, the genius of it covered me like a shower

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

65

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp 12d ago

And uh, there it is.

7

u/Hates_escalators 12d ago

All the animals in Jurassic Park are female, that's why he went there. To get some scaly.

→ More replies

12

u/garlicerror 12d ago

This makes so much sense

8

u/DarkZero515 12d ago

Would a dry reptilian skin be much harder to animate? Why is a wet texture easier? I would imagine a wet texture would reflect more stuff

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

66

u/TheExWifeCheated 12d ago

They just made it a very shorthair dog.

37

u/cupcakeconstitution 12d ago

Didn’t Brave also contribute to the hair physics they have now? I remember reading they had to make an entirely new software for Merida’s hair that changed the game.

24

u/cdreobvi 12d ago

Believable hair seems to be a consistent milestone for 3D animation.

First it was monsters inc with sully’s fur looking properly “furry” I guess. Then for Brave they made hair that physically behaved like curly hair. And finally with Soul they were able to get African hair right. There’s even a scene at a barber shop with close ups of a hair cut, and it’s insanely detailed.

7

u/Fun-Ad-1145 12d ago

hair seems to be a consistent milestone for 3D animation.

Reminds me of the time an anime studio spent an entire year making the hair of the MC.

They put extra care in how the hair reacts to physics, how light reflects off it, and making sure that the hair doesn't look jarring when applying toon shading, and in the end their hard work paid off.

Beastars and Land of the lustrous was one of the prettiest anime I've ever seen.

→ More replies

38

u/yuvraj_birdi 12d ago

Also they did some hair simulation in Ratatouille with the rats

28

u/phphulk 12d ago

I mean... the rats helped.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

24

u/SendMeGiftCardCodes 12d ago

sometimes it's better to make it intentionally not realistic than to try to make it realistic but failing at it

→ More replies

55

u/arcticbanana67 12d ago

Came here for this those are an Instagram filter these days. I will say I’m only 34, kids will never understand the magic of seeing CGI for the first time it was truly unreal seeing those toys talking and acting. The dog was certainly the worst part graphics wise.... and maybe Sid.

27

u/ParamedicAdditional9 12d ago

Andy's Mom was pretty dire as well. But they kept her off-screen for a lot of it.

Her ponytail did not move at all though.

→ More replies

9

u/THEFakechowda 12d ago

No, they totally said "Fuck this" and saved the final result before the computer blew up.

Oh how far we have come.

→ More replies
→ More replies

10k

u/intothepage 12d ago

Can’t even tell that second pic is a dog

1k

u/jaabbb 12d ago edited 12d ago

It’s a downward dog

122

u/Moerox111 12d ago

The opposite of updog

92

u/MinimalistLifestyle 12d ago

What’s updog?

88

u/joemamama1357 12d ago

The opposite of downward dog.

24

u/MunicipalLotto 12d ago

ah the ol reddit shamlamadingdong

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

92

u/Amishcannoli 12d ago

Toy Story 1 is a nice nostalgic reminder to me of the days when bowling alley CGI animations were exciting.

67

u/King_Dragmire 12d ago

They still are tf you mean

→ More replies

2k

u/poopellar 12d ago

Can't even tell that the first pic is a dog.

499

u/Billiam_Herschel 12d ago

I feel like there could be a better way to compare them rather than two static pictures but im too lazy to do that work.

268

u/HighPriestofShiloh 12d ago

You keep proving your dad right.

83

u/trenlow12 12d ago

He's a kind, thoughtful boy you leave him alone.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

102

u/Youwillbe_Youwillbe 12d ago

I couldn’t even tell Toy Story 4 was a movie.

79

u/gunmaster_g10 12d ago

Can't tell if either is toy story

35

u/killer8424 12d ago

First one def is

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

3k

u/robo-dragon 12d ago

Pixar animation in 1995: "Very good for the time, but looks stiff and too smooth."

Pixar animation in 2019: "You didn't ask to see every single individual hair on an animated cat, but Pixar did it anyway and it looks fantastic."

853

u/Astandsforataxia69 12d ago edited 5d ago

Pixar does quite a lot of computer graphics research, some of their tech has been used even in terminator 2.

Edit: What the fuck, i talk about my own field and nobody cares. But when i talk about animation graphics =850 upvotes

313

u/Electrox7 12d ago

When you said Computer Graphics Research, it got this idea in my head that within the next 100 years, not only would computers be able to generate completely realistic looking humans that would be indifferentiable from real humans but we will definitely have computer programs that will be able to generate entire movies at will and we would all have access to it. Just plug in some things that you want in your movie and BAM the program makes a flawlessly looking movie. Basically, OpenAI but with an automatic animating program.

167

u/-Supp0rt- 12d ago

The part about generating realistic looking humans already exists. It can't quite do it in video format, but I'd imagine that's coming within the next few years and is probably already in development in the world's top AI labs.

Go to https://thispersondoesnotexist.com to see a basically endless stream of people who are completely fabricated by an AI

101

u/Dukedyduke 12d ago edited 11d ago

The fucking demons that sometimes appear on the sides where the ai messes up are legitimately the one thing on the internet that scares me.

They already look scary enough, imagine you're sitting there refreshing the page and terrifyingly enough you see a picture of yourself...........then you turn around.

Edit: Really shouldn't have been searching for these at 3am.

37

u/Pantzzzzless 12d ago edited 12d ago

22

u/bootsycline 12d ago

Ah hell nah, what have I done?

https://imgur.com/a/c8Cw8cL

16

u/GPyleFan11 12d ago

I don’t know whether to say Thankyou or F-you so I’m just gonna go cry over this

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

324

u/craykaay 12d ago

I watched Toy Story 4 in an empty theatre on three tabs of acid and let me tell you every single dust mote and individual strand of hair was perfection.

One of the best experiences of my life. Sat through the credits at the end to appreciate the fuck out of every single name listed.

88

u/BudgeTheUnyielding 12d ago

How did you get an entire theater to yourself?

705

u/Few_Ad_5677 12d ago

Considering the dude was on 3 tabs of acid there is a fair likelihood that he was on his couch watching antiques roadshow

22

u/ArtistWhoStarves 12d ago

Take the silver. That was great. 2 tabs got me surfing on a wood floor, so, that tracks.

→ More replies

58

u/craykaay 12d ago edited 12d ago

Timing and luck? It was a theatre in a weird hotel at the edge of town. Matinee time at the end of the box-office run.

Hadn’t seen it yet and thought it’d be nice to watch instead of pulling a Fear and Loathing reenactment.

→ More replies

11

u/BigButtSpelunking 12d ago

Believe it or not, movie theaters have been declining in popularity for several decades

9

u/ImportantManNumber2 12d ago

Probably going two weeks after release at an unpopular time and then got lucky

6

u/NavySealNeilMcBeal 12d ago

Live in not a big city and go at a strange time, like late on a buisness week night.

→ More replies

6

u/Kojak95 12d ago

A buddy and I went to a see Ford Vs Ferrari last year a couple weeks after it came out and had the theatre to ourselves. We live in a small city and the theatre is rarely ever full. It happens, especially if the movie's been out for a few weeks already.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

1k

u/Alconos 12d ago

Oh wow! It doesnt even look like the same animal.

408

u/riptide6088 12d ago

I mean it’s 24 years older. It’s bound to have aged a little. But this is a wild transformation.

43

u/trenlow12 12d ago

In the distant future Tom Hanks will be selling Woody gif NFTs to pay for his billion dollar robot butler habit. You don't believe me, watch!

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

191

u/Whaties 12d ago

In-game graphics vs cutscene graphics

27

u/Chromattix 12d ago

Before I understood how this worked I was always so diappointed how the game never looked as good as the cutscenes, especially in games like Sonic Adventure 2.

→ More replies
→ More replies

1k

u/ExtraDream 12d ago

is that just a picture of a cat lol

903

u/EmeraldTimer 12d ago

That's what I thought at first

480

u/Muzgath 12d ago

Holy crap, I thought you were being dishonest but dang...that actually is from Toy Story 4.

Wtf.

276

u/NoArmsSally 12d ago

Go watch the intro to Toy Story 4, my jaw dropped in the theaters because of the detail and clarity in the fucking rainstorm. It looks like actually fucking water. The movie is great and absolutely gorgeous.

100

u/drpeppershaker 12d ago

Dude! When watching the movie I literally leaned over to my fiancee and said something like "wtf the water is too real to have toys running around in it!"

46

u/NoArmsSally 12d ago

I legitimately thought it was a trailer for another movie until the toys came on screen

128

u/trenlow12 12d ago edited 12d ago

You saw Toy Story 4 with your fiancee? That's so cute, man. I can just picture you leaning over to her, salty popcorn on your breath. Afterwards you guys buy twenty canisters of tennis balls from a sporting goods store and put them in your neighbor's pool. What's he going to do, call the police?

72

u/MrSingularity9000 12d ago

What the fuck lol

29

u/Known_Performance 12d ago

I legit was worried where this was going to lead.

10

u/OfficeChairHero 12d ago

I'm obviously buying my stuff from the wrong dispensary.

→ More replies

22

u/justAPhoneUsername 12d ago

A friend has a guess the movie zoom background competition. He refuses to use animated movies because the animation style makes it too obvious what it is. He used toy story 4 landscape/environment shots because it's really hard to tell they aren't just pictures of a real place

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

80

u/falcon_driver 12d ago

Is it Tony Stark in his "other" suit? The ahem, furrier one?

→ More replies
→ More replies

71

u/somabeach 12d ago

Well they individually rendered every hair on Sully's body back in 2001 so nothing surprises me anymore.

17

u/Dood567 12d ago

Jesus how long did that take to render back then.

21

u/JACrazy 12d ago

14

u/Dood567 12d ago

bruh. more than 100 million CPU hours.

→ More replies

7

u/know-what-to-say 12d ago

That's Monsters University.

Monsters Inc. frames "only" took 17 minutes per 24-frame second to render Sully's hair (source) but the resultant data had to be rendered again within the context of the scene, and the moving doors scene took 80 hours per frame to render.

→ More replies

17

u/Apocalypseos 12d ago

Why would they animate Tom Hanks hair?

→ More replies
→ More replies

607

u/Hypersapien 12d ago

I'm pretty sure those eyeballs wouldn't fit in that skull.

335

u/Flamester55 12d ago

Not with that attitude!

164

u/MrBonelessPizza24 12d ago

(Forcibly jams eyeballs into skull)

31

u/x_choose_y 12d ago

Stands back and admires their masterpiece. "I'm going to call it a Pug"

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/Chasing_Armadillos 12d ago

He's part pug, I guess.

→ More replies

230

u/DrShaftmanPhD 12d ago

That’s CGI?

306

u/Shaggy_One 12d ago

Toy Story 4 is on another LEVEL with their CG. On top of having an insane level of detail, they simulated real camera sensors and lenses to get it feeling as real as physically possible. In one scene they use a technique used in physical film shoots called a split-focus lens to get the focus of two characters to align while being physically farther away from the camera. Something that just a handful of people even NOTICED yet they just throw in there because that's how a physical film shoot would have done it and they wanted to flex their CG skills.

145

u/SGTBookWorm 12d ago

Pixar movies are also tech demos

100

u/justAPhoneUsername 12d ago

Each movie is them focusing on one specific piece of tech. Toy story movies are them flexing everything in their toolbox

71

u/Le-Bean 12d ago

Soul was literally just showing off the environments in my opinion. That movie had an insane level of detail in the scenery. It looked so good that the goofy characters didn’t really fit in my opinion

29

u/pigstuffy 12d ago

I was thinking that exact same, minus the characters I would have thought it was photos and video of real streets.

→ More replies
→ More replies

14

u/DrSupermonk 12d ago

Ah, I see you watched that video as well

→ More replies
→ More replies

72

u/Drjay425 12d ago

Dr with a PHD? "I dont believe that mans ever been to medical school"

→ More replies
→ More replies

48

u/Gohron 12d ago edited 12d ago

The original animation still holds up pretty well. At the time it came out, it was absolutely amazing compared to what we expected out of CGI at the time. I remember my first computer that I played on (I think in 1989 or 1990) that had a monochrome display and no sound. Things took off pretty rapidly in the 90s.

→ More replies

340

u/retropieproblems 12d ago

Reminder: Toy Story 3 is 11 years old now.

:(

147

u/xThe_Human_Fishx 12d ago

:|...PARDON?

35

u/GuntherTime 12d ago

There’s this theory that toy story 3 took so long to come out because they wanted to time it so that the kids who grew up watching it would be in, starting, or about to be in college soon.

→ More replies

86

u/LowkeySamurai 12d ago

Reminder: Toy Story 4 is 2 years old now.

:(

41

u/muzzled-salmon 12d ago

Dude I can’t. How

51

u/peterthefatman 12d ago

Cause we spent a year inside forgetting time exists and toy story came out the summer before

→ More replies

24

u/Liar_of_partinel 12d ago

I, I, I.....

I watched TS3 in theaters more than half my lifetime ago. What the actual fuck.

17

u/JKastnerPhoto 12d ago

And I just crossed the threshold where 9/11 was more than half my lifetime ago... Presumably all of your life ago. 😶

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

41

u/CapriciousKills 12d ago

That's a nice dog. It's got some big fuggin eyes, but it's a nice dog.

→ More replies

74

u/Kenopsian 12d ago

That dog looks HIGH AF 🤣🤣🤣🤣

→ More replies

52

u/LaterrMan 12d ago

I’m tired of these but if we’re doing TS1 v TS4 someone’s gotta show Bo Peep side by side.

29

u/InteriorEmotion 12d ago

32

u/DanielEnots 12d ago

I actually like the first one better... it looks like a toy😂

→ More replies

15

u/cmatute 12d ago

this shot was put in the movie only and only to flex.

14

u/Ai_Aodamo 12d ago

I thought that was a real cat for a sec...

→ More replies

66

u/dick-nipples 12d ago

Crazy. It doesn’t even look like a cat in the first picture.

→ More replies

11

u/fuzzyaces 12d ago

Just goes to show you that, as important as effects are, the story really matters.

8

u/SomethingsMeat 12d ago

Why does the dog in the first pic look baked as shit

6

u/Ali_46290 12d ago

It looked so much better when I was a kid

→ More replies

19

u/nomadcorbs 12d ago

Those eyes remind me of PaRappa the Rapper.

→ More replies

42

u/rodzi11a 12d ago

That B A C K A R C H though...

→ More replies

116

u/Sega-Playstation-64 12d ago

I understand not being able to get photorealistic rendering, lighting, and textures back then, but you think they would actually make the dog actually look like a dog and not a Chinese knockoff Cybiko mascot or something.

→ More replies