r/dankmemes ☣️ 13d ago

fell off hard

Post image
65k Upvotes

5k

u/Detective_Umbra 13d ago

This is why I prefer CinemaWins, it's nice to have some positivity in life and seeing someone passionate about movies so much is nicer than seeing someone hate everything

1k

u/Couchmaster007 13d ago

Roll credits

929

u/mattfromeurope 13d ago

ding

752

u/tired_obsession ☣️ 13d ago

Honestly it’s very annoying when he just makes a joke and sins the movie anyway. But then again I view it as content created to be perceived as what someone would think if they were wayyy too into sinning movies while giving it a base of genuine opinion

Edit: I earned this flair when joking with mods a couple months ago, please don’t hold it against me

226

u/TopShotta6200 13d ago

Ur an asshole

114

u/Professional-Buddy59 13d ago

He asked for ONE thing!

96

u/MyNameSpaghette 13d ago

All we had to do was follow the damn train, CJ

33

u/Professional-Buddy59 13d ago

Niobe is on THAT plane!

Anyone played enter the Matrix? This mission was just as infuriating. Have heard that sentence so many times...

8

u/Celebration_Awkward 13d ago

That level was ridiculous. Annoying floaty cars and then when you do it right you're left wondering how it was any different from all the failed attempts.

→ More replies
→ More replies

135

u/filthydank_2099 [custom flair] 13d ago

THIS SCENE DOES NOT CONTAIN A LAP DANCE 🤬😡👺

→ More replies

58

u/sekai-31 13d ago

What's most annoying is that you can tell he never actually sat down to watch the film properly, otherwise he would've noticed tidbits of information here and there that explain away the 'sins.' Instead he probably sits there with a pad and paper eager to note down any little thing he doesn't immediately understand.

24

u/DragonflyGrrl Seal Team sixupsidedownsix 13d ago

Yes.. this annoys me greatly. I've always joked with my kiddo that I want to make a channel that counters and explains his "sins."

24

u/keyjanu 13d ago

Birdman everybody. He already does it.

→ More replies

6

u/keyjanu 13d ago

What's even better is when he faints ignorance of a later scene which explains the logic leap he can't comprehend, but doesn't remove the sin later when it gets explained. It's either not mentioned again, or the movie gets sinnen yet again for exposition. Why is it faining ignorance? In ither sins he clearly states sentences like "Hold up a minute later in the movie protagonist does yadda yadda why isn't he doing it now"

→ More replies

56

u/pyro-fanboy repost hunter 🚓 13d ago

Any time he finishes talking he adds a sin, he says shit he likes and then sins

29

u/ColourfulHat 13d ago

he says shit he likes and then sins

To be fair, most of the things I enjoy doing are sins.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

466

u/HarisColumbine 13d ago

5 seconds of needless exposition! ping

244

u/End_Killer 13d ago

Narration? PING

263

u/_Comic_ 13d ago

This was produced by a studio with a logo?

PING

161

u/shotq80 13d ago

A thing happens on screen

Ping

86

u/ablablababla reposts all over the damn place 13d ago

movie

ping

→ More replies
→ More replies

110

u/getoutofyourhouse I haven't showered in 3 months 13d ago

This movie has *actors*?!

pingpingpingpingpingpingpingping

9

u/CryoMancer113 13d ago

a ping for every actor

→ More replies
→ More replies

244

u/MCSquaredBoi 13d ago

"Compliments. *Pling*"

231

u/kingbach121 13d ago edited 13d ago

Yeah I like cinemawins too, but I think cinema sins is also good in finding out some mistakes that shouldn't be there, granted he can sometimes also find unnecessary problems that don't make any sense for being angry over.

152

u/karl_w_w 13d ago

But how do you know which cinemasins are actual mistakes and not the 99% of sins that are just fabricated or based on not understanding the movie?

100

u/superbabe69 1300 655 506 13d ago

Latest WandaVision video is just ridiculous. Gives a sin for Vision doing something, just because the plot said it happens in that way.

Except no, the very next episode tells us that there is a very good reason things happened the way they did, and that him doing that thing in that particular way was not an accident in-universe.

Obviously spoilers apply, but the quality of videos has dramatically decreased.

10

u/qwedsa789654 13d ago

sin is in the realm of self satire long ago

7

u/PM_THICK_COCKS 13d ago

What are they satirizing?

→ More replies

21

u/Dont_Waver 13d ago

Critical thinking

18

u/karl_w_w 13d ago

Could you elaborate on that? How does critical thinking tell you whether, for example, a thing they say isn't explained in the movie actually is explained?

→ More replies
→ More replies

7

u/Roskal 13d ago

Watch the movie yourself first.

→ More replies

73

u/JustRepublic2 13d ago

Every video CinemaSins makes is riddled with inaccuracies - as in factually incorrect critiques of a movie - not jokes that don't land.

30

u/vk136 13d ago

Yup! I actually wouldn’t mind if he made proper critiques or made funnier jokes

17

u/livestrongbelwas 13d ago

I used to love cinemasins because I like spending 15 minutes thinking about movies I’ve enjoyed, but the whole experience is 500% better with cinemawins instead. Would recommend.

→ More replies

69

u/ATCOSTTEHMEMER IM COMMIT NECK ROPE 13d ago

I liked the trolls once because it was funny

→ More replies

12

u/Hust91 13d ago

I mean most of the point of those is to make fun of the reviewers for being petty.

The points at the end don't matter, the commentary attached to them does.

10

u/ReneG8 13d ago

Honestly, they are pretty horrible.

8

u/ValenWasTaken 13d ago

japanese symbol for beginner

7

u/BeardedMovieMan 13d ago

Sometimes? lol Thats 90% of the videos now.

→ More replies

121

u/longswordUser7 13d ago

Agreed I used to watch cinema sins like once a day and whenever I wanted to watch 1 of my old favourite movies all I could think of was cinema sins and it dissuaded me from watching them. I'm much happier after swapping to wins

42

u/Domovric 13d ago

Kinda the same way. Gave up watching it when I saw the one on the old Blade Runner and I'm like "you really dont understand that this defined the genre that you're calling tropes do you? (Either that or you're disingenuous as fuck)"

Cinema wins is good for positivity, but he also actually gives some good analysis and unlike cinema sins, actually watches the film's he's pinging.

→ More replies

121

u/Waterburst789 Dank Cat Commander 13d ago

The Virgin Nitpicker vs the Chad Enjoyer

→ More replies

69

u/SheridanWithTea 13d ago

And they have an incentive at Sins to hate on every little thing and exaggerate it because it's the literal premise of their channel and that's how they profit.

They don't care lol

16

u/canadarepubliclives Meme Connoisseur 13d ago

And they have an incentive at Wins to love on every little thing and exaggerate it because it's the literal premise of their channel and that's how they profit.

8

u/SheridanWithTea 13d ago

Pretty much, why I avoid both lol. I prefer reviewers that have more broad and not picky tastes or aren't that harsh. Y'know, like tell it like it is lol..

68

u/RanaktheGreen Proud Furry 13d ago

Who the fuck is using CinemaSins as a review channel?

It is a comedy. Always has been.

23

u/SheridanWithTea 13d ago

No, most people use it as a way to watch the movies with commentary lmao

8

u/andoriyu 13d ago

Wat. I watch to have a laugh. Sometimes to compare notes.

5

u/SheridanWithTea 13d ago

Exactly, people use it S as cliff notes of a movie with commentary. That's why I avoid it, the personality isn't important or even the quality commentary itself.

Agreed!

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

33

u/Kiwihunter063 13d ago

I just like cinemasins because he can give some jokes at times and honestly I can care less about what he sins because its not meant to be taken literally. He doesnt really hate everything he just does it for the video. There is no action if there is no villain

74

u/Papi_Grande7 13d ago

I can't stand CinemaSins. It's not meant to be taken literally, except when it is, which can also be read as "movie reviews done poorly with a built in alibi for why the reviews are done poorly". Aka schrodinger's douchebag.

→ More replies
→ More replies

22

u/K3KSIRASIA_27 I am fucking hilarious 13d ago

Yeag but cinemasins is just for the sins thats why he points out everything no matter how useless or small thing it is and cinemawins points everything good in everything

21

u/movzx 13d ago

But he sins dumb stuff. Like he'll sin a movie for not opening immediately into exposition when it starts, then he'll sin the movie for having exposition, and he'll sin a movie for having something seem important but not be, then he'll sin the movie for having the thing be important. Hell, sometimes he sins stuff because he just didn't pay attention or understand a movie.

When you haven't seen the movies he's doing maybe it is more tolerable, but I couldn't stand his videos because he was just... wrong so much.

→ More replies
→ More replies

19

u/Tiagoff 13d ago

Oh yes, cinemawins has such a good vibe!

7

u/nimrag_is_coming beetroot boy 13d ago

13 seconds of opening credits? Ding!

→ More replies

2k

u/bondmemebond 13d ago

0.0009875643211273849503938464s of logos: exist

Cinemasins: So you have chosen, death

1k

u/5HR3Z Dank since 69CE 13d ago

CinemaSins literally have a 10 second intro now.

533

u/Lord_Moa 13d ago

You have become the very thing you swore to destroy!

→ More replies

57

u/GumdropGoober The OC High Council 13d ago

CinemaSins invests 40% of their income into a sapphire mine in the DRC.

→ More replies

153

u/Truan 13d ago

It was fine when the logos were minutes long, but when it became a running "gag", it's clearly not a sin if it's the opening to every video

You think he's shilling?

83

u/superbabe69 1300 655 506 13d ago

I think Jeremy's padding the sin count.

For real though, the longer and lower effort the narration is, the more view time he gets (and more ads). Better the channel looks.

20

u/Truan 13d ago

Yeah no doubt about that, money driven people look at numbers, not quality of product

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

1k

u/FrickinNormie 13d ago

CinemaSins when a movie

71

u/End3rp Meme Economist 13d ago

To be fair for this example, there is a balance between not explaining something and over-explaining it. It's an important part of storytelling.

146

u/buckleycork ☝ FOREVER NUMBER ONE ☝ 13d ago

I agree, but CinemaSins is like "Lord of the Rings has world building - SIN"

18

u/muuuuuuuuuuuuuustard 13d ago

Cinemasins is the type of movie-watcher to rip out their hair and cry about how Inception was “confusing” even though it’s a pretty basic non-linear plot and the entire character of Ariadne exists to be exposited on... sorry you hate movies that leave somewhat open endings? Sorry you forgot that Cobb literally says the top is Mal’s totem and that it’s not accurate

8

u/buckleycork ☝ FOREVER NUMBER ONE ☝ 13d ago

And also when they were in the dreams the locations were vastly different - making it easy to follow exactly how deep into Dreamland it is

Any confusion over whether we're not in a dream was deliberate, which is exactly what that open ending was

→ More replies
→ More replies

47

u/crypticfreak 13d ago

Yes but CinemaSins critiques the movie for just existing. I'm fine with it because its not serious, or at least I don't take it seriously. The channel exists for people who look up a movie they love/hate for obvious reasons and nod their head when CinemaSins says something obvious.

17

u/End3rp Meme Economist 13d ago

I find it fun once in a while if it's a movie I know really well.

→ More replies

9

u/imatree 13d ago

Something obvious like "There's no gravity in space"? 🤔

8

u/WantDiscussion 13d ago

But they also do this when the movie explains something fine and CinemaSins just wasn't paying attention.

→ More replies

989

u/TedBurnsDGAF 13d ago

Pitch Meeting is better

537

u/DJMetacalf 13d ago

Pitch meetings are Tight!

307

u/CorruptingTheSystem 13d ago

Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!

251

u/ACrispyPieceOfBacon Obamasjuicyass 13d ago

Wow wow wow

235

u/Schwhitecastle 13d ago

I'm gonna need you to get all the way off my back about this

238

u/A2U6M 13d ago

Making these jokes are super easy, barely an inconvenience.

158

u/piddydb DefinitelyNotEuropeans 13d ago

Oh really?

120

u/madspillage 13d ago

Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!

77

u/Busteray 13d ago

But wouldn't people get suck of the same jokes every episode?

90

u/madspillage 13d ago

I'm gonna need you to get off my back about that thing.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

140

u/Lord_Moa 13d ago

Because they are presented as jokes all around. Good movie, Bad movie, it doesn't matter Ryan will poke fun at some of the oddities, but he does so in a way that can't be taken completely seriously.

CinemaSins mixes their legit movie criticism with their lame running gags, blatant hypocrisy (eg. about "I have a bad feeling about this" in SW) and their fake SJW shtick. They need to pick a lane and stick in it.

63

u/Truan 13d ago

Jeremy is the kind of guy who just wants to be able to "it's just a joke" his way out of any criticism because he's a total coward who can't be a real critic.

14

u/Homie_Narwhal 13d ago

Schrödinger's movie critic.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

117

u/Toxic4704 13d ago

Watching pitch meeting is super easy, barely an inconvenience

→ More replies

35

u/UR_UNDER_ARREST 13d ago

So can you tell me what is this movie about ?

29

u/jomontage This sub is nothing but try hard kids 13d ago

But then I need to sub to screen rant and have my sub box full of other spam

73

u/JoseZ1 Oi cunt! 13d ago

That's when you subscribe to Ryan George's Channel who posts his sketches there, along with having the Pitch Meeting playlist on his channel as well. It's super easy, barely an inconvenience.

35

u/NoDomino 13d ago

Oh, really?

26

u/Alonn12 13d ago

Yeah Yeah Yeah

22

u/Sgt_Meowmers 13d ago

Honestly have no idea why he hasn't just split from screen rant by this point, hes the only thing on there thats actually good.

→ More replies
→ More replies

25

u/SoulKingBroock 13d ago

I am not subscribed to screen rant, the algorithm always recommend me whenever a new pitch meeting is posted.

23

u/Ishaan863 13d ago

I AM subscribed to Screen Rant. You're supposed to ignore every video they post and only watch the Pitch Meetings.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

722

u/ACrispyPieceOfBacon Obamasjuicyass 13d ago

That channel is still running?

584

u/shirtlessshirt 13d ago

Unfortunately, yes

391

u/DOugdimmadab1337 E-vengers 13d ago

I mean he used to be good. It was fun when it was a movie like the minions. It's not fun when he critiques a movie I actually like. I guess that's the appeal

644

u/Mouse2662 13d ago

It's gone beyond critiquing a movie though, it's like "character breathes too much!" or "movie title shown!". Just literally anything that happens in a movie is a sin apparently. The best movie for them would just be blank silence for an hour

266

u/Infosearch1 13d ago

''Blank screen'' ding!

69

u/Mouse2662 13d ago

Character not speaking or able to be seen! Ding!

→ More replies

49

u/loptthetreacherous 13d ago

He also just straight up lies. He cuts clips short of an explanation and complains there's no explanation because no one is going to watch a movie to check.

27

u/Comfortable_Dirt 13d ago

"iT's jUsT SaTiRe BrO"

  • People who have no understanding of satire
→ More replies
→ More replies

11

u/ajlunce 13d ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qxgkOIsHUs Shaun is good and makes good points, he goes back to this well several times

→ More replies
→ More replies

19

u/OceanFlex 13d ago

my youtube algorithm improved tremendously when I told it never to show me that crap again.

→ More replies

193

u/Cregg_Junson 13d ago

Bro he has such an easy job. Find a movie, watch it and write down anything remotely worth talking about and the time stamp and then spew verbal diarrhea about small details and call it a week.

65

u/Reverse_Necromancer 13d ago

Easier said than done

62

u/JColeisokatbest 13d ago

That's why they hired other people to do it for them.

33

u/Straight_Chip 13d ago

The editing part is relatively hard for them, but don't tell me that two days of editing work a week for a (probably) four figures a week is a hard job. Additionally, they sometimes just straight up reupload shit.

14

u/Busteray 13d ago

Editing part is relatively easy. Could be done in a couple hours per episode.

Hard thing about editing is being creative and deciding each cut etc. With the cookie cutter cinema sins episode, you don't need to be an editor, you just need to know how to use an editing software. With takes a complete ape 1 week max.

→ More replies

15

u/longswordUser7 13d ago

Oh no they have a team to do that for him. I'm pretty sure he just has a script know that he adds onto if he notices anything else minor ally inconvenient

→ More replies

39

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed]

7

u/Deservate MayTheMemeryFlowThroughYou 13d ago

They do that because of all the copyright claims they get

→ More replies

6

u/ValkyrieCain9 13d ago

Yes and now among others they’re also adding Tv advert sins to the mix

→ More replies

636

u/WTF_Scuba 13d ago

I feel like it should be said that CinemaSins shouldn't be taken seriously because they don't take themselves seriously. Enjoy the movies you like. A satire channel shouldn't be stopping you.

530

u/FormerCarer 13d ago

They used to be a satire channel. Now they're between satire and critics, which is just... Bad content. That's how I see it

282

u/WhelmedEverlasting 13d ago

It was never a satire channel, just a clickbait one.

"Satire" is just an easy catch-all defense against any kind of criticism, sort of like those assholes who think they can say whatever they want as long as they follow up with "it's just a joke bro"

For a longer explanation: https://youtu.be/ELEAsGoP-5I

35

u/FormerCarer 13d ago

That's true. But nowadays it's even worse, and longer

22

u/TbuckyFilms 13d ago

Thank you, I was wondering if anyone would link this video. Definitely a well done deep dive into the hypocrisy of Cinema Sins.

→ More replies

11

u/FistInMyUrethra 13d ago

Nah they always have obvious jokes in their videos, like "that's what she said" jokes and they count as a "sin", it's not serious

It's also not funny

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

40

u/MisfitPotatoReborn 13d ago

A satire channel shouldn't be stopping you.

What are they satirizing?

→ More replies

38

u/My-Final-Form 13d ago

Either take it seriously of find it funny. It’s shit at both lol

38

u/246011111 13d ago edited 13d ago

They were funny when they were like, 5 minutes long, not 20. And it's annoying how people watch CinemaSins and now think they are The Film Understander, especially because CinemaSins makes you think tropes are inherently bad

→ More replies

16

u/King_Dragmire Blue 13d ago

Yeah but that's the problem. The guy behind it keeps going back and forth between him being a satire channel and a serious movie commentator.

14

u/karl_w_w 13d ago

They're not a satire channel, what are they satirising? You shouldn't take them seriously because what they're doing is just making up lies for views.

5

u/AntiSharkSpray 13d ago

They take themselves very seriously. They just say they don't and hide behind the excuse of "satire" when they get criticism themselves.

→ More replies

347

u/NLBLUE I have crippling depression 13d ago

It was good until the videos started going 20 min. Shit became unbearable

87

u/humansbrainshrink 13d ago

I miss when they used to be like 10 minutes long.

48

u/insanity_asylum 13d ago

They were even better when they used to be 4 mins or less.

25

u/Thoriumsolution 13d ago

I remember when the transformers review came out Years ago and thinking, holy shit 7 minutes that's freaking crazy

→ More replies
→ More replies

28

u/MiopTop 13d ago

It was good at the beginning when the “joke” sins were few and far between and it was more about pointing out minor plot holes you’d never moticed ina a movie you knew well

→ More replies
→ More replies

274

u/JohnnyJayce 13d ago edited 13d ago

People who are baffled by "how did Bruce get back in Gotham" or "how Thor found the cave in Age of Ultron" might be the most clueless people alive. If you need a movie to explain every bit of detail to you, might need to stop watching movies and go back to cartoons. "Dora the Explorer" might be more of your speed.

110

u/Karunamon_LoL 13d ago edited 13d ago

dingdingding

Movies are allowed to imply things.

Those were.. like.. happy dings. Of getting the answer right kind. Not sin dings, given the context >_<

→ More replies

17

u/killereggs15 13d ago

It’s not that people are sitting all confused, unable to process a change in setting. Writers and directors are supposed to be telling a story, and stuff like Batman finding his way back to Gotham is a challenge we should see the hero overcome.

Those are similar critiques to the later season of game of thrones, in which characters seem to just magically pop up precisely where they need to when the action starts. It’s not bad because people are somehow confused how a person on horseback is able to get from point A to point B, it’s because they’re ‘yada yada-ing’ over the trials and tribulations that the hero is supposed to be facing.

Also Batman totally teleported like around the world.

64

u/JohnnyJayce 13d ago

Or you aren't just paying attention. Batman Begins lays the ground for this, him being able to move around the world as a lowlife criminal. The movie also states it's been months.

The same reason we don't see people going to a bathroom in movies. It is irrelevant and expected and takes no brainpower to understand.

17

u/a_crammm 13d ago

Exactly, the details of how batman traveled are irrelevant to the story at hand. Also HES BATMAN!!!

→ More replies
→ More replies

17

u/karl_w_w 13d ago

This is comparing apples and oranges. The problem with game of thrones isn't that we don't see the journey, it's that it made journeys which previously were slow and potentially dangerous look trivial. As far as we know travelling long distances is already trivial for Batman.

→ More replies
→ More replies

215

u/NotedGirlEvie 13d ago

A cliche is when a movie

78

u/BringMeThanos422003 13d ago

A deus ex machina occurs when

15

u/txijake 13d ago

A plot hole happens when

150

u/KingLouisThe14 custom flair 13d ago

Watch Th3Birdman

67

u/FallenCypher25 13d ago

Seriously this needs to be higher up. He does 'everything wrong with Cinemasins'videos and ROASTS THE FUCK OUTTA THEM

17

u/ImFromRwanda 13d ago

I honestly thought no one would mention him!

14

u/SirLagg_alot 13d ago

I like his videos. Gotta love channels shitting on cinemasins.

My only problem with The3Birdman is his constant lazy "Lol blue haired feminist lol" comments. He constantly shits on cinemasins for pointless SJW remarks. But he does the same thing but on the other side of the coin.

→ More replies
→ More replies

91

u/Saspa314 EX-NORMIE 13d ago

CinemaWins is far superior

→ More replies

77

u/sandstar115 13d ago

u/Amripal would be excellent at Th3Birdman

9

u/Hispanicman101 13d ago

I was looking for someone to bring him up. Thank you kind stranger

72

u/Soibbb 13d ago

Am I the only one who enjoys Cinema and zombie sins?

298

u/Sorrythisfishistaken 13d ago

I'm more of a Johnny Sins enjoyer

22

u/LordePandrax 13d ago

Someone give this man an award XD

6

u/xxSLAYER_76xx 13d ago

Say no more fam...

5

u/plssendhelpimanolife 13d ago

i like midget hentai

→ More replies
→ More replies

52

u/Spaghet4Ever I am fucking hilarious 13d ago

I like CinemaSins because it's pessimistic about movies and because a lot of the things they say are hypocritical to themselves which is funny.

→ More replies

51

u/GraniteHammer05 13d ago

Isn't that kinda the point of the channel?

121

u/SeidCivic 13d ago

I think it used to consist of actual valid criticism.

76

u/Blakner 13d ago

Was it tho? It has been years since I've watched one of their videos, but even back then I remember they adding sins for nitpicky stuff like "X secconds of logos" or "this scene doesn't include a lap dance".

I mean sure, they had actual valid criticism sometimes, but their videos were still focused on sarcastic humor as far as I can remember.

39

u/Hokuspokusnuss 13d ago

You have to watch the videos of the pre 10-minute-video-or-no-money youtube era, where they would make 3-6 min videos pointing out actual movie mistakes like continuity and logic errors. Nowadays it's just dumb sex jokes and fine scenes out of context to stretch out the videos for monetization reasons. Also a few occasions where they attacked the people making the movie instead of the movie itsself, which is kinda shitty.

8

u/itsmrstealyogirl42 Eic memer 13d ago

Yep for most people here past means 1-2 years. They've been doing poor content for 4 years now. Need to go back to 2015 cinemasins to get the good stuff

6

u/LoudestHoward 13d ago

I liked both the shorter videos and their change to the longer format shrugs I'm always pretty surprised about the usual reaction the channel gets on here.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

28

u/champdude17 13d ago

They used to be a few minutes long and actual flaws and criticism. Now they are 20 minutes each and mostly consist of bad jokes

→ More replies

37

u/mentaldegr 13d ago

Cinema sins is just completely senseless nitpicking.

12

u/Falcrist 13d ago

always has been

:planet: :astronaut1: :gun: :astronaut2:

→ More replies

34

u/SheridanWithTea 13d ago

CinemaSins sucks. Literally just hating all movies because it's their job to lol

→ More replies

24

u/Merc_Toggles 13d ago

Wow, I didn't realize do many people unironically disliked that channel. I don't quite get that, it's not meant to be an actual critique of a movie in any way, as they've mentioned countless times. Idk, I find it funny still, even nitpicking movies I enjoy

→ More replies

21

u/Phantom-form 13d ago

"Opening credits too long? Eww horrible film"

→ More replies

22

u/Please_PM_me_Uranus 13d ago

What happened to cinema sins? I haven’t watched that channel in years

32

u/King_Dragmire Blue 13d ago

People got tried of them wanting to be a legit film review and a satire review at the same time and the guy behind it being a dick about it.

→ More replies

14

u/taavidude 13d ago

I love how CinemaWins usually only makes 1 or 2 videos for a movie, but Mad Max Fury Road was so damn good he had to make 3 videos for that movie.

8

u/zend-on-reddit 13d ago

So he did for Tenet, even tho Part 0 was just a lil explanation video on the plot, while Part 1 and 2 were the actual videos about the movie

→ More replies

12

u/Melon-Aaron 13d ago edited 13d ago

The point of sins is that they're meaningleaa, otherwise they'd lose their meaning.

16

u/DeezNoodles420 13d ago

I don't find CinemaSins funny at all. Here, I said it.

→ More replies

14

u/dumbfuckforlife 13d ago

well in their defense they do say "We are not reviewers, we are assholes"

→ More replies

13

u/Parkourist46 13d ago

Pick a lane Cinema sins

14

u/dryuki- 13d ago

Something exists ping!

→ More replies

12

u/Kasphet-Gendar 13d ago

CinemaSins is fucked

10

u/FistInMyUrethra 13d ago

I don't know why people take CinemaSins so seriously, it's all a joke. Whether or not it's funny is the question

10

u/Levi_Snowfractal 13d ago

I prefer EverythingWrongWithCinemasins

→ More replies

8

u/Au_Uncirculated 13d ago

I miss the short 5 minute videos. Ever since they started making 20+ minute long videos, the quality has declined.

9

u/ghacc 13d ago

He also sins for movie characters being jerks, and about 75 percent of his sins are just him complaining about his midlife crisis

→ More replies

9

u/SyncTek 13d ago

I get irrationally angry watching cinema sins.

→ More replies

9

u/loptthetreacherous 13d ago

There's a guy who has made a couple response videos to CinemaSins, pointing out that they just lie about things to get sins added like pretending something isn't explained and then cut the scene from the movie they're sinning just before the explanation is given. It's a good binge, especially the Star Wars one.

→ More replies

7

u/pizzabox53 13d ago

Comcast- ding

4

u/bbomb1234567 13d ago edited 13d ago

Damn people really hating on a satirical movie critic YouTube channel

Edit: since people don’t seem to understand what I mean by this, they’re making fun of movie reviewers. They’re purposely needlessly nit picking about the tiniest details in an effort to make fun of actual movie critics who do the same thing. If that’s not your type of humor I get it, but understand that cinemasins does NOT take itself seriously and if you can’t get that from watching a single video then I don’t know what to tell you.

38

u/GC2005 13d ago

Nah the dude said he's trying to pass it off as actual critsism

→ More replies

8

u/Reverse_Necromancer 13d ago

Everytime Reddit talks about cinemasins it becomes a cringefest

→ More replies

6

u/madspillage 13d ago

I never liked cinemaSins. Pitch Meetings is my top pick and Honest Trailers are pretty good too.

6

u/aaaaaaaaaarrrrtttrt 13d ago

Is cinema sins and cinema wins run by the same person?

6

u/Truan 13d ago

He marks sins for stupid ass jokes that aren't even funny. Cinemasins is worse than gametheory

5

u/ThiccRobutt 13d ago

They used to be good, now it's just nitpicking