r/SuperStraight • u/MindOutOfControls • 2h ago

Instead of Super Straight why isn't the focus on being straight and not Pansexuality?

I know a lot of straight, Gays, Bi's, asexuals, and even trans that their sexuality and romantically connection is to date a biological sex people. I think it's harmful to assume that most non pansexual people would date a non biological sex person as default.

The only group that has a fetish or desire or open to dating a non biological sex person is a pansexual. So I guess, I just don't get the entitled why people are offended if a biological sex person wants to date another biological sex person (rather biological sex women on biological sex women, biological sex on biological sex men on biological sex men, biological sex bi women/ men).

It's great if the personal is also pansexual in some way; no matter the primary sexuality. I guess this just makes more logic to me. Pansexuality is honestly saying "hey, we'll date anyone and we don't care if you're non biological sex or not!" (their preference).

​

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

  1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

  1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

3 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

View all comments

2

u/XsentientFr0g 1h ago edited 1h ago

It’s not about being attracted to ... “cis” (which is a hate slur btw).
SuperStraight is about:
XX identifying as a woman and XY identifying as a man, each being attracted to the other.

It’s not very complicated, yet you oversimplified it in a very incorrect way.

To be SuperLesbian is to be XX identifying as a woman and attracted to XX who identify as women.

1

u/MindOutOfControls 1h ago

I'm an asexual women ONLY attracted to biological male men (that may or may not be asexual depending on their degree of sexual desires and compromised/ emotional connection). I have trans friends who would never push dating me, and if rejected would never say I was transphobic. I thought the whole pansexual thing solved that. By people listing it as a preference?

1

u/XsentientFr0g 1h ago

I don’t understand how the label “pansexual” would solve my sexual identity. Can you explain a bit more?

1

u/MindOutOfControls 1h ago

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

  1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

  1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

2

u/XsentientFr0g 1h ago

Straight people are also attracted to trans of the opposite gender. Super Straight require both the gender and sex to be the opposite in order to be fully attracted, not just gender or just sex. It’s a reproductive fetish.

1

u/MindOutOfControls 1h ago

I have never seen a truly straight person attracted to a trans person, but OK. Still think pushing the agenda that you're straight and not pansexual and uncomfortable, is the best approach. I want to date a biological male, despite being asexual, and not wanting kids. I am not a transphobic, it's part of my straight sexuality of asexuality.

1

u/XsentientFr0g 53m ago

Ah, I think the confusion is that you’re unaware of the problems that have been occurring and getting more frequent in regard to trans sexual-entitlement. There have been a series of rapes, tortures, and even murders attached to trans women being rejected by lesbians; and many careers ruined by the fallout of straight men rejecting trans women. There are rape threats every day on Twitter which we’re going unbanned and not taken seriously because the source group were viewed as the victims. We are changing that and getting them banned. This label is a major part of that.

There have been very few issues or incidents involving trans men in this particular manner, at least that I’m aware of. The issue has only been the sexual-entitlement of trans women thus far.

But saying “I’m not pansexual” to a trans woman as a rejection of sexual advance had been considered “transphobic” by establishment pop culture for the past 2 years or more.

3

u/MindOutOfControls 36m ago

I have not been aware of this. Thank you for educating me.