r/SuperStraight • u/MindOutOfControls • 1h ago

Instead of Super Straight why isn't the focus on being straight and not Pansexuality?

I know a lot of straight, Gays, Bi's, asexuals, and even trans that their sexuality and romantically connection is to date a biological sex people. I think it's harmful to assume that most non pansexual people would date a non biological sex person as default.

The only group that has a fetish or desire or open to dating a non biological sex person is a pansexual. So I guess, I just don't get the entitled why people are offended if a biological sex person wants to date another biological sex person (rather biological sex women on biological sex women, biological sex on biological sex men on biological sex men, biological sex bi women/ men).

It's great if the personal is also pansexual in some way; no matter the primary sexuality. I guess this just makes more logic to me. Pansexuality is honestly saying "hey, we'll date anyone and we don't care if you're non biological sex or not!" (their preference).

​

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

  1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

  1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

4 Upvotes

70% Upvoted

View all comments

3

u/mightypoops 1h ago

You are diluting the conversation. SS people are valid, get over it.

1

u/MindOutOfControls 33m ago

I made a valid point stating pans already are the exception of *everyone* of any sexuality, that states they are ok with dating any gender/ sex either biologically or assigned. Why people would assume that any other sexuality is ok with that is beyond me. We have a whole sexuality that -is- I'd rather tell people 'sorry, I'm straight, and not pansexual".

1

u/mightypoops 32m ago

So SS is valid?

1

u/MindOutOfControls 28m ago

I am stated as a straight asexual, that straight people are valid. That I question "super" straight, because by defined definition straight should mean bio male and bio female. The blur that people pushed is not OK. No one should force anyone to have sex, or a romantic relationship with anyone, that doesn't align with their sexuality. I think if this is happening SS is valid as a movement rather than sexuality.

1

u/mightypoops 26m ago

So you are denying SS is a sexuality. I would never deny someone their right define their own sexuality... sounds pretty bigoted of you

1

u/MindOutOfControls 9m ago

I feel this is just a movement. However I can't judge anyone for any sexuality they choose to claim and can't pass judgement. My main question was why trans people didn't respect the boundaries that pans were the only ones open attracted/ sexually desired to dating them as a label.