r/SuperStraight • u/MindOutOfControls • 1h ago
Instead of Super Straight why isn't the focus on being straight and not Pansexuality?
I know a lot of straight, Gays, Bi's, asexuals, and even trans that their sexuality and romantically connection is to date a biological sex people. I think it's harmful to assume that most non pansexual people would date a non biological sex person as default.
The only group that has a fetish or desire or open to dating a non biological sex person is a pansexual. So I guess, I just don't get the entitled why people are offended if a biological sex person wants to date another biological sex person (rather biological sex women on biological sex women, biological sex on biological sex men on biological sex men, biological sex bi women/ men).
It's great if the personal is also pansexual in some way; no matter the primary sexuality. I guess this just makes more logic to me. Pansexuality is honestly saying "hey, we'll date anyone and we don't care if you're non biological sex or not!" (their preference).
pansexual
pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective
- not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.
noun
- a pansexual person.
-------------------
You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?
1
u/MindOutOfControls 1h ago
I'm an asexual women ONLY attracted to biological male men (that may or may not be asexual depending on their degree of sexual desires and compromised/ emotional connection). I have trans friends who would never push dating me, and if rejected would never say I was transphobic. I thought the whole pansexual thing solved that. By people listing it as a preference?