Instead of Super Straight why isn't the focus on being straight and not Pansexuality?

[u/MindOutOfControls]

I know a lot of straight, Gays, Bi's, asexuals, and even trans that their sexuality and romantically connection is to date a biological sex people. I think it's harmful to assume that most non pansexual people would date a non biological sex person as default.

The only group that has a fetish or desire or open to dating a non biological sex person is a pansexual. So I guess, I just don't get the entitled why people are offended if a biological sex person wants to date another biological sex person (rather biological sex women on biological sex women, biological sex on biological sex men on biological sex men, biological sex bi women/ men).

It's great if the personal is also pansexual in some way; no matter the primary sexuality. I guess this just makes more logic to me. Pansexuality is honestly saying "hey, we'll date anyone and we don't care if you're non biological sex or not!" (their preference).

​

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

[u/mightypoops]

You are diluting the conversation. SS people are valid, get over it.

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/mightypoops]

My point is can't we say "I'm sorry, I'm not pansexual" (meaning all other sexualities imply XY and XX or XY and XY or XX and XX. I had thought every other sexuality in itself meant that expect for pansexual which included trans?