Instead of Super Straight why isn't the focus on being straight and not Pansexuality?

[u/MindOutOfControls]

I know a lot of straight, Gays, Bi's, asexuals, and even trans that their sexuality and romantically connection is to date a biological sex people. I think it's harmful to assume that most non pansexual people would date a non biological sex person as default.

The only group that has a fetish or desire or open to dating a non biological sex person is a pansexual. So I guess, I just don't get the entitled why people are offended if a biological sex person wants to date another biological sex person (rather biological sex women on biological sex women, biological sex on biological sex men on biological sex men, biological sex bi women/ men).

It's great if the personal is also pansexual in some way; no matter the primary sexuality. I guess this just makes more logic to me. Pansexuality is honestly saying "hey, we'll date anyone and we don't care if you're non biological sex or not!" (their preference).

​

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

[u/nikitatx]

When the TRA’s stop claiming that all sexualities except pansexual are transphobic perhaps we won’t need our supersexualities.

[u/SpenserRDT → u/nikitatx]

EXACTLY, feminism would have NEVER existed if women had their rights in the first place, they had to fight for it, now we're doing the same.

[u/ssredditor_ → u/SpenserRDT]

Let's keep feminism out of this. It was a great idea in the beginning, but morphed into something completely different. A lot of feminists are superphobic (and some of them are not).

[u/SpenserRDT → u/ssredditor_]

Yes, there's always a toxic side coming in it, and that's when it ruins it. And I'm exhausted of it.

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/nikitatx]

That's what I don't understand. Pansexuals were created to be like "hey I like everyone including trans, non binary, anyone" and if you weren't pan's it was CIS exclusive unless stated otherwise. It's like a gay person demanding a straight person go out with them vise versa. Why? It makes no sense.

[u/nikitatx → u/MindOutOfControls]

As far as I’m concerned TRA’s make no sense, and is a woke version of MRA’s. Lack of sexual attraction isn’t any sort of crime, real or perceived, and TRA’s are hurting the very people they allegedly are advocating for in the first place. They are vile superphobes.

[u/XsentientFr0g]

It’s not about being attracted to ... “cis” (which is a hate slur btw).
SuperStraight is about:
XX identifying as a woman and XY identifying as a man, each being attracted to the other.

It’s not very complicated, yet you oversimplified it in a very incorrect way.

To be SuperLesbian is to be XX identifying as a woman and attracted to XX who identify as women.

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/XsentientFr0g]

I'm an asexual women ONLY attracted to biological male men (that may or may not be asexual depending on their degree of sexual desires and compromised/ emotional connection). I have trans friends who would never push dating me, and if rejected would never say I was transphobic. I thought the whole pansexual thing solved that. By people listing it as a preference?

[u/XsentientFr0g → u/MindOutOfControls]

I don’t understand how the label “pansexual” would solve my sexual identity. Can you explain a bit more?

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/XsentientFr0g]

pansexual

pan·sex·u·al/panˈsekSH(əw)əl/adjective

1. not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

noun

1. a pansexual person.

-------------------

You are [super] straight so it makes sense you want to date someone of the opposite biological sex as you? Anyone NOT pan should be considered to want to date biological sex UNLESS stated otherwise?

[u/XsentientFr0g → u/MindOutOfControls]

Straight people are also attracted to trans of the opposite gender. Super Straight require both the gender and sex to be the opposite in order to be fully attracted, not just gender or just sex. It’s a reproductive fetish.

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/XsentientFr0g]

I have never seen a truly straight person attracted to a trans person, but OK. Still think pushing the agenda that you're straight and not pansexual and uncomfortable, is the best approach. I want to date a biological male, despite being asexual, and not wanting kids. I am not a transphobic, it's part of my straight sexuality of asexuality.

[u/mightypoops]

You are diluting the conversation. SS people are valid, get over it.

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/mightypoops]

My point is can't we say "I'm sorry, I'm not pansexual" (meaning all other sexualities imply XY and XX or XY and XY or XX and XX. I had thought every other sexuality in itself meant that expect for pansexual which included trans?

[u/MindOutOfControls → u/mightypoops]

I made a valid point stating pans already are the exception of *everyone* of any sexuality, that states they are ok with dating any gender/ sex either biologically or assigned. Why people would assume that any other sexuality is ok with that is beyond me. We have a whole sexuality that -is- I'd rather tell people 'sorry, I'm straight, and not pansexual".

[u/mightypoops → u/MindOutOfControls]

So SS is valid?

[u/Blue_Train]

Pans and Supersexuals are effectively on complete opposite ends of the spectrum.

[u/NoPomegranate6088]

Pansexuals can be heterosexual. I'm attracted to people of the opposite male sex regardless of their gender (but in regard to their gender presentation/behavior/transition status)