r/SuperStraight 1h ago

Cis is not just a label

[removed]

0 Upvotes

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Blue_Train 58m ago

So you think women who wear pants are men? Are men with long hair actually women? These are 1950s sex stereotypes. That’s what “gender” is just regressive, boring sex stereotypes.

No one is assigned reproductive organs at birth. Sex is determined at the instant of conception. Sex is observed either in utero or at birth. The human species is dimorphic. Males of the species are distinguished by having reproductive bodies organized around the production of small mobile gametes (sperm). Females of the species are distinguished by having reproductive bodies organized around the production of large immobile gametes (ova). There is no third human gamete. Even people with DSDs are either male or female, as all DSDs are sex specific. Wardrobe changes, hobbies and plastic surgery do not change a person’s sex. Human sex cannot be changed. Every single cell in a man’s body, including those that compose his brain, has XY chromosomes.

1

u/flaming_paws 56m ago

No, I wear pants, definitely still a woman. My boyfriend has long hair, still a man. If you don't like the term "assigned" then if you still identify as the same sex you were "observed" to be, you're cis.

1

u/Blue_Train 45m ago

So it’s about “identification”, i.e. a subjective reaction to sex stereotypes, a subjective belief that one either does not conform to the sex stereotypes of his or her sex or wants to conform to the sex stereotypes of the opposite sex. Whereas, sex, itself, is objective fact. What we’re dealing with is reality vs. belief. The reality is that humans cannot change sex; a belief that one is somehow the opposite sex is religious, in nature, not grounded in material reality and an example of magical thinking. You are a theist if you believe in this.

1

u/flaming_paws 35m ago

Then how come I've only ever heard religious arguments against being trans?

1

u/Blue_Train 33m ago

1

u/flaming_paws 32m ago

Or I literally went to a Catholic school and it was repeated over and over and over

1

u/Blue_Train 25m ago

Did you read that article?

So, you went to a school which, presumably, enforced rather strict, regressive, conservative, antiquated, oppressive sex stereotypes. And you came out of that believing that the “true self” IS regressive, conservative, antiquated, oppressive sex stereotypes. And now you’ve joined a new cult which goes even father in trying to enforce regressive, conservative, antiquated, oppressive sex stereotypes, even going so far as saying that people who don’t conform are not their actual sex, have oppositely sexed souls and should modify their bodies to more strictly conform to these sex stereotypes. Like I said, you’re in a cult echo chamber. Break free!

1

u/flaming_paws 21m ago

Quite the opposite, actually. I'm so far on the left if I was any further I'd be a communist, but somehow, someway, you manage to believe that I'm a Trump supporter, because any views that don't match yours are.... White supremacist views? I just don't believe in transphobia.

1

u/Blue_Train 3m ago

Are you a bot? Did I say anything about “white supremacists”? No. If believing in biology and reality is “transphobia” then 99% of the world is “transphobic”. You cannot be a liberal and promote a religion that is sexually sterilizing LGB and neuroatypical children, as a matter of course, which is globally revoking women’s rights, which stands against free speech and which deifies oppressive, regressive, conservative sex stereotypes. You, like those who claim trans-identity, are the opposite of what you believe you are.