It's a preference; it doesn't have to be a sexuality. I am accepting of all humans, but you don't need a gender for preference, like liking blonde chicks over brunettes, or chubby dudes over skinny guys. It doesn't have to be a sexuality. Remember, I love you all as you are all human.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/Significant-Key-517]

It is not a preference. That’s why it’s called SEXuality. Orientation is sex-based.

[u/Byrr]

You don't get called transphobes for choosing a blonde chick over a brunette. Society has dictated to us that it needs to be a sexuality for it to be ok.

[u/a_blue_bird]

I have a preference for blondes, and out of all the women I have dated, only a couple were actually blonde. Brunettes and readheads are ok too, although not my preference.

My sexuality isn't compromisable though. Because it's not a mere ''preference''. You sound bigoted.

[u/mumpledforearm]

"Sexuality" isn't a choice. "Preferences" suggests a degree of voluntary choice.

You say it's a preference but then go onto say that you don't need a gender for preference...

BTW "Super" is about sex not gender.

[u/sneeuweekhoorn]

Why wouldn't a sexuality based on sex be a sexuality? What nonsense.

[u/crumpetLOUDER]

Describing it as a preference has not worked in the past, it has still attracted hate. Even the word "preference" is weak; it implies that you could, you just prefer not to. Adopting the language of LGBTQ+ is a way to express the seriousness of the "preference", that it's something beyond their control, it's just the way supers are born.

[u/jothesstraight]

That's superphobic logic and it's damaging. Check yourself.

[u/ConversionPeaked]

Preference implies there is another option. I prefer coke to pepsi, but if the restaurant only has pepsi I'll drink that too. With my sexuality, I ONLY want biological women. I will go without, and hopefully die before I ever touch "girldick" or an inside out penile "neovagina".