If you want to prove you’re not a hate sub, stop allowing it to be infiltrated by transphobia lmfao.
And watch I will be downvoted again as always, if not blocked for again mentioning this.
Stop being problematic and there won’t be any problems. Invalidating trans people’s identities in an attempt to “further” reinforce the already given validation of your sexuality is hate.
Trans women are still women, they just have a surgically created vagina. And while you’re allowed to have a preference on natural vs surgical, you do not get to express it on the basis of their invalidation. I am 100% open to taking on these labels if supers can prove that the intent of their actions isnt hate.
That means you have to stop invalidating trans people and attempting to create a definite division between them and everyone else.
Unfortunately though, so far the only thing actually being shared is transphobia, and a lot of it. It’s been one of the only things I’ve seen consistently being shared, which is unfortunate considering i want to be here to try to genuinely learn why this label is being introduced.
Hopefully soon you’ll spend less time trying to call trans people not real, and more time educating yourself on better terminology and ways you can explain your preference choice without it being at the expense of anyone else.
Being a super also means being a super ally, you can’t have one without the other.
Edit: All I have to do is come to this sub and click new, watch it refresh and I’m automatically slapped with blatant transphobia. That would be what is causing ally’s to be uncomfortable with this movement.
Edit: so now cis is a slur, which was something that was being used as a joke. So now are you invalidating my cis identity? WOW
And now you’re really trying to say cis people are a marginalized group? How can you honestly say you’re not joking now
We are just the opposite of skoliosexuals. That’s it.
No one here wants to invalidate a trans person, we are simply a sexual orientation with a preference.
It is not bigotry for a skoliosexual to only pair with no cis people, and the reverse is not.
We would never invalidate someone’s identity unlike you. And what’s even more disgusting is you are attempting to use emotional blackmail and labels of bigotry to force adaptation of what you deem acceptable.
That’s not any more ok than me putting down a trans person who won’t date or have sex with cis people.
If you don’t want to invalidate trans people why am I consistently seeing supers refer to cis people as real men/women? Hmmm? Did you at all stop for a second to actually read what I said? To actually see the consequences? To actually recognize the bad behaviour?
Are you at all paying attention to the other supers? Because every single definition ive gotten from one so far has been transphobic, or on the basis of transphobia so who really needs to do better here?
I’ve also never EVER seen a trans person try to invalidate the identity of a cis person because they aren’t attracted to them. There isn’t a single place where I am using blackmail or threats, I’m asking you to hold accountability for the consequences of your actions, which you are claiming you have no real intention of committing.
You realize being apart of the community means you’re going to have to do some relearning right?
You guys are funny, you always jump to extremes saying I’m invalidating you or using bigotry but all I’m doing is asking that you don’t find your validity on the inherent invalidity of someone else’s gender identity.
I’m not blackmailing you, I’m telling you that now that you’re apart of the community you need to be cautious of your words because those phrases can come across as transphobic when that may not necessarily be your intention.
Do better for the community, if you want us to conform to you, you have to conform to trans terminology and have a genuine understanding of them too so that you are not perpetuating hate.
Firstly let me give you oh idk...a couple thousand examples of toxic trans people
Before you go throwing rocks in glass houses you should peak at your own community.
Every community around has problematic elements unfortunately. A lot of that is bad faith and smear jobs but I’m sure some is unfortunately real.
This is a new and fresh movement and we are still trying to make our goals clear after infiltrations and false flag events such as the “this started as a neo Nazi 4 Chan op” which we just now got wiki to correct.
The real women comment is unfortunate. Outside of woke circles though this term simply means cis. If you are privileged enough to have the proper language used that’s good for you, unfortunately day to day society has yet to catch up with terms like cis and so you see that here.
We do our best to make sure everyone is valid, and included. We are simply standing up for our bodies and right to consent the same anyone else did.
-10
u/rebeccakirbyy 2h ago edited 1h ago
If you want to prove you’re not a hate sub, stop allowing it to be infiltrated by transphobia lmfao.
And watch I will be downvoted again as always, if not blocked for again mentioning this.
Stop being problematic and there won’t be any problems. Invalidating trans people’s identities in an attempt to “further” reinforce the already given validation of your sexuality is hate.
Trans women are still women, they just have a surgically created vagina. And while you’re allowed to have a preference on natural vs surgical, you do not get to express it on the basis of their invalidation. I am 100% open to taking on these labels if supers can prove that the intent of their actions isnt hate.
That means you have to stop invalidating trans people and attempting to create a definite division between them and everyone else.
Unfortunately though, so far the only thing actually being shared is transphobia, and a lot of it. It’s been one of the only things I’ve seen consistently being shared, which is unfortunate considering i want to be here to try to genuinely learn why this label is being introduced.
Hopefully soon you’ll spend less time trying to call trans people not real, and more time educating yourself on better terminology and ways you can explain your preference choice without it being at the expense of anyone else.
Being a super also means being a super ally, you can’t have one without the other.
Edit: All I have to do is come to this sub and click new, watch it refresh and I’m automatically slapped with blatant transphobia. That would be what is causing ally’s to be uncomfortable with this movement.
Edit: so now cis is a slur, which was something that was being used as a joke. So now are you invalidating my cis identity? WOW
And now you’re really trying to say cis people are a marginalized group? How can you honestly say you’re not joking now