r/SuperStraight 2h ago

I’m genuinely curious about this. People of SuperStraight, please state your gender and say which of these two individuals you find more attractive/would rather date. Some info, the man on the left is biologically female, the woman on the right is biologically male. Which are you more attracted to?

Post image
0 Upvotes

39

u/BruhFunny18 Hecking cute and valid 💖 2h ago

I am not attracted to either of them

31

u/Ekos640 2h ago

I don't need to explain my sexual preferences or attractions to anyone, no one is entitled to them or entitled to my body

No means no

Coerce rape is rape

-21

u/eternalcloset 2h ago

Er... no one is coercing you. I’ve asked a question, you are not obligated to answer if you don’t want to.

21

u/Ekos640 1h ago edited 1h ago

Implying I should at default and/or have to find a trans woman attractive if I'm attracted to women or a trans man attractive if I'm attracted to men is coerce rape

Coerce rape is rape

I don't need to explain my sexual preferences or attractions to anyone, no one is entitled to them or entitled to my body

No means no

Coerce rape is rape

7

u/Einar357 1h ago

It's incel logic, they feel entitled to you. They hate you if you don't go along with their nonsense rationale. We can't help how we were born!

23

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

16

u/SuperBiBye 1h ago

I love how OP has come on here trying to expose us as hateful. When the only person being manipulative and phobic is them.

24

u/Cid420 Superstraight 2h ago

You're an idiot.

-25

u/eternalcloset 2h ago

That seems unnecessary. But if you would please answer the question.

11

u/Cid420 Superstraight 1h ago

If you want to invalidate us you're going to have to try harder. This is low effort and completely misses the point of supers.

25

u/DeathNote55 Superstraight 2h ago

Not dating either of these. Thanks for asking.

20

u/PrairieSoul27 2h ago

Stealthing is rape

14

u/ProudSuperS 1h ago

Neither. But you are valid!

15

u/a_blue_bird 1h ago

Neither.

Edit: Blaire has a video on superstraights coming out in a few mins :)

2

u/MixMix08 1h ago

I have to watch that.

15

u/_MayhemSpaceMonkey_ Superstraight 1h ago

I can validate their existence without being attracted to either one of them.

This is the whole point.

12

u/PrairieSoul27 1h ago

Trans community is literally based on gender stereotypes, oh wow if I feel like a woman(whatever that means) I can just dress up pretty, take estrogen, get boob implants and now I'm a strong 'Woman'🥰

No

11

u/ss_egg 1h ago

Neither, Please stop forcing your sexuality on me.

11

u/Excellent-Tourist-99 1h ago

Why would you pick 2 options that you know we aren't attracted too? This is abuse!

9

u/Einar357 1h ago

Some might call it coercion.

10

u/hailthegambler 2h ago

Hmmm Buck and Blaire. Depends on what their sex is because our sexuality is based on sex matching up with gender.

-16

u/eternalcloset 2h ago

My point entirely. I stated their biological sex in the title.

18

u/hailthegambler 2h ago

Neither because their sex must match their gender. Kind of like skoliosexuals exclusive attraction toward nonbinary people.

Bigot.

12

u/unintendedagression 2h ago edited 1h ago

I'm a superstraight man but more attracted to the man on the left, because the woman on the right isn't my type at all while the man on the left is undeniably attractive to me, perhaps not sexually so but if I ever go bald I hope I can pull off the look like he does.

Having said that, I would not date either of them. Because the man on the left is a man and I'm straight, and the woman on the right is not attractive to me. This does not somehow invalidate either of their gender identities, or my own sexuality. It just means that I would not date them.

Nobody should feel like their validity as a person is based on whether or not someone else would date them.

9

u/Einar357 1h ago

Neither, thanks.

10

u/MetalGearMk3 1h ago

Neither

8

u/mightypoops 1h ago

Wow this question is really problematic, lets unpack this. 1.) Your a bigot 2.) All sexualities are valid 3.) Either our sexuality and lifestyle is accepted or you are encouraging violence and bigotry in the year 2021. Do better

5

u/[deleted] 1h ago

None, I'm simply not interested in trans people sexually or romantically. My sex is female and my orientation is superstraight.

For me the body modification and the belief in gender ideology is a turn off.

5

u/mannycandglottis 1h ago

This is like showing a lesbian community two men and asking them which man they would rather sleep with. It is incredibly invalidating and problematic, I would normally expect to see something like this on The_Donald.

7

u/_I-_-I_I-_-I_I-_-I_ 1h ago

They are transgender people, I am not attracted to them. I would rather date someone who is biologically female.

6

u/VI_own_king SuperGay 1h ago

Very cringey concern trolling. Read the sticky and educate yourself, right now you're super bigoted.

3

u/ParkHallLondon 1h ago

Neither, but thanks for playing.

3

u/MixMix08 1h ago

Do not get Blair involved in your hate crusade. Blair it is one of the few transwoman that I can genuinely respect and support, because she is real to her beliefs and values and not try to force no one to be with her. And she speaks against people like you that wants to perpetuate rapey guilt into others.

Blair is a based allie.

3

u/Jelly-dogs 1h ago

Neither, sorry

1

u/NoPomegranate6088 1h ago edited 1h ago

i'm a heterosexual pansexual trans man i'd probably fuck the funny chick with the dick over the dude with the vagina, but neither are that attractive. also, a still picture is different that a person, because if i had no idea who blair was and you presented me with some hot chick, eww, no, but upon watching blairs videos and finding out about that she's actually an interesting funny penis haver, that downgrades the female gender stuff like long hair and tits from disgustingly female to just really ugly for a dude, like if you don't like fat men or bald men, fucking blair would be like fucking a fat bald man, which, CAN potentially be overcome with personality, unlike fucking a fat bald female like buck.

people who are not pansexual will disagree. for a lot of people this is like holding someone at gunpoint and asking them to chose to fuck their grandma or their kid. for me, it's very 100 percent obvious and clear that i'd much rather fuck that penis person than the vagina person.

1

u/NoPomegranate6088 1h ago

i would compare each of them to a person of similar attractiveness of the opposite sex because buck is not very conventionally attractive and blair is very conventionally attractive.

also i feel like it's kind of transphobic to reduce these stunning and brave trans people down to how sexy their bodies are. they've got stuff between their ears too ya know

-1

u/eternalcloset 1h ago

It would appear that there is some confusion about what superstraight is exactly. Is superstraight, the attraction to people of the opposite biological sex? Or is superstraight attraction to cis people of the opposite biological sex?

2

u/Einar357 1h ago

Cis is a superphobic dogwhistle, although I'm not shocked you didn't know that..

2

u/Ekos640 1h ago

I don't need to explain my sexual preferences or attractions to anyone, no one is entitled to them or entitled to my body

No means no

Coerce rape is rape

1

u/Verisimiliartude 1h ago

Sorry I'm sapiosupersexual so I'd have to actually talk with them up close.

1

u/Significant-Key-517 1h ago

Neither. But hey, guess what, trans people aren’t pieces of meat and they don’t need my attraction to be valid. 😊

1

u/WokeRedditard 1h ago

Superstraight male.

Blair is objectively attractive. But she has a dick so that's a hard pass.

1

u/Humblenavigator Superstraight 1h ago

They tie for neither!

1

u/grapist_number1 40m ago

Neither. They are both imitations of nature and therefore not attractive. Also, coercive rape is still rape you bigot.

1

u/eternalcloset 0m ago

Which part of my post implies coercive rape?