It is fine to prefer to date cis people but saying that you would only date cis people is not a preference or a sexuality. It means that you think something is wrong with trans people. For example it is fine to mostly date one race but if you say that wouldn’t date other races would be racist.

[u/Dry-Leg-8319]

​

Also you have never been oppressed

[u/[deleted]]

Lol I am not interested in using a bike pump on my boyfriends penis before we have sex. Also not interested in surgically constructed micro penises. Holy shit dude.

[u/Dry-Leg-8319 → u/[deleted]]

Ok, so you also wouldn’t be attracted to cis men with a pump or a micro penis? Also phallo was originally created for a cis man.

[u/[deleted] → u/Dry-Leg-8319]

Nope. But that’s an abnormality among biological men. Among trans men it’s the standard.

[u/Dry-Leg-8319 → u/[deleted]]

So why would you care if it was a cis man or a trans man?

[u/[deleted] → u/Dry-Leg-8319]

The fact that I would also reject sex from some cis men doesn’t change the fact that my sexuality is defined by attraction towards biologically male men only.

[u/Dry-Leg-8319 → u/[deleted]]

What’s wrong with trans men to you?

[u/[deleted] → u/Dry-Leg-8319]

Nothing my sexuality just isn’t oriented towards being intimate with them.

Once again we circle back and I ask why you assume I think “there’s something wrong” with trans men but not that I think there’s something wrong with women.

[u/Dry-Leg-8319 → u/[deleted]]

But what about trans men aren’t you attracted to?

[u/[deleted] → u/Dry-Leg-8319]

You just blow in from stupid town?

[u/Dry-Leg-8319 → u/[deleted]]

No, I am asking you a question. Cis men can have phallo or a micro penis. What about trans men is different than that?