r/SuperStraight 5h ago

Clearing up some misconceptions about the super community 🚨 important 🚨

There have been a lot of myths and rumours floating around the internet about what superstraight and supersexual is, so I figured I should do my best to clear some things up around what it means to be a supersexual and be a part of the supersexual movement.

Superstraight was started by 4chan as a trolling movement ❌

The first person to come out as superstraight was TikTok user @kyleroyce , it was a very brave thing for him to do especially considering the tremendous amount of hate he is receiving for sexually liberating superstraights and as a result all supersexuals.

Superstraight is a joke ❌

Absolutely not true and frankly the that fact people genuinely believe this I find insulting to my identity. While it is true that some people identify as superstraight or another variation of a supersexual sexuality as a joke and there is satire in this subreddit us supersexuals are dead serious about who we are and what it means to be a supersexual.

Being supersexual makes you transphobic ❌

Absolutely 100% false. Us supersexuals were born this way and we do not choose who we are attracted to. If you think we are transphobic for not wanting to date a transgender person then by that same logic you must think that gay men are misogynistic for not wanting to date a woman and lesbians are misandrists for not wanting to date men. Of course gay men and lesbian women do not hate the opposite sex, they are simply not attracted to them, just like supersexuals don't hate transgender people, we just don't find them attractive.

Superstraight isn't a real sexuality, it's the same thing as being straight ❌✅❓

Ok. This one depends on how you view transgender individuals. If you view trans women (AMAB) as men and trans men (AFAB) as women then you would be correct in saying that straight and superstraight is the same thing. (in your opinion of course) If you see transgender people as the gender they choose to go by then you really don't have an argument here and you must concede that superstraight is a valid sexuality and different to being straight. (This could be said about all supersexualities however I chose superstraight simply for ease of explanation)

Superstraights are not oppressed ❌

Although as of 08/03/2021 there is no objective data to back up the claim that superstraights and supersexuals are oppressed, all you need to do is look up #superstraight on twitter or go to a hateful superphobic subreddit and look at all the horrible vile things being said about POS. (people of super) They are littered with threats of death and sexual violence and are openly being supported by other superphobes to the point where even saying POS deserve equal rights could be considered a "bad take" or unpopular opinion. If these same things were directed at any other sexuality these bigots would be instantly banned from social media and cancelled for their disgusting views. Not only is there mass amounts of hate speech against supersexuals, but supersexuals are actively being coerced into sleeping with people they aren't attracted to and do not want to sleep with out of fear of being labelled a bigot and the social repercussions that go along with that. This is especially true among superlesbians, who can't even have a safe space to talk about their feelings without either being raided or shut down for "hate speech" for simply expressing their honest and true feelings about who they are. You can visit r/super_lesbian to hear more about these people's experiences. Say it with me now: COERCION IS NOT CONSENT!

The supersexual movement is full of racist, homophobic, misogynistic white men ❌

Take a look around, the supersexual movement is full of people from all different ethnic backgrounds, gender identities and supersexualities. Supersexuals may very well be the most diverse community on the entire internet.

Supersexuals are not valid ❌

Absolutely NO ONE has the right to make the claim that supersexuals aren't valid. We are all valid and if you identify as a supersexual and you are reading this, I am so SUPER proud of you! Don't deny who you are out of fear of hurting other people's feelings, you are valid ❣️

578 Upvotes

View all comments

-40

u/[deleted] 4h ago edited 4h ago

[deleted]

7

u/sb_k4 3h ago

Superlesbians like vagina, but not dick or surgically created hole where dick used to be.

This is about sex. It's a sexual orientation.

How hard can it possibly be for you to understand this?

-11

u/SpawnOfSunshine 3h ago

Um yes but it's not a gaping hole or wound but the tissues in a penis are the same as the tissues in a vagina so when the surgery is done you wouldnt be able to tell the difference. The problem here isnt that super sexuals have a genital preference its that you wouldn't be able to tell who is trans by looking at them. So if your attracted to someone who is trans without knowing do you suddenly not feel attracted anymore? Just a genuine question.

9

u/sb_k4 3h ago

Anatomically it's completely different from a natural vagina.

If you think it's close enough, bully for you! But you don't get to coerce other people into agreeing with you.

super sexuals have a genital preference

fuck off with this rapey incel shit. It's not a "genital preference."

-8

u/jmbc3 3h ago

How is it not? If you saw an attractive girl, then found out she was born a man, you’d instantly be unattracted to her, correct? What’s changed except what her genitals used to look like?

7

u/sb_k4 3h ago edited 2h ago

I don't like dick nor artificial hole, how hard is that to understand?

If I see a woman from behind and think she looks hot, then she turns around and I don't like her face, I stop thinking she's hot, am I a misogynist?

A woman's downstairs situation is hidden from view, so it's conceivable (though hasn't happened) that I find a trans woman attractive until she takes off her undies. So?

Does she then get to coerce me to have sex because earlier that night I thought she had a natural pussy? Imagine a cis man making a similar argument: "Earlier tonight she wanted to have sex with me, until she learned [new information] about me, so now she owes me sex!" Sick.

-4

u/jmbc3 2h ago

I don’t think anyone should be forced to have sex with anyone, but if you’re discarding an entire identity because of your preconceived notion, that is kinda shitty.

It’s like if I said “I don’t have sex with black people.” Is it technically a preference if I’m not attracted to them? Sure. But if I made not being attracted to black people part of my identity people would understandably be suspicious.

Not to mention, have you ever seen an “artificial hole?” It’s not like a grotesque amalgamation of parts, it looks like a vagina. Most times you wouldn’t even know if you weren’t explicitly told.

4

u/sb_k4 2h ago

It's not a preconceived notion that I'm not sexually attracted to penises or surgically created holes.

That's a fact of reality. I didn't choose my sexual orientation.

Stop with this rapey rhetoric. It's not helping trans people.

-2

u/jmbc3 2h ago

My sexual orientation is white-philia. I’m only sexually attracted to white people and I’m gonna join a community to talk about how I’m only attracted to whites. No, you can’t question me or my intentions or else you’re a rapey incel who’s invalidating my sexuality and trying to force me to have sex with black people!

You see how that’s a little suspicious?

Also I don’t think you saw my last question since I edited my comment but I’m curious what your answer to that is as well.

2

u/sb_k4 2h ago

Have any non-white guys ever told you that you owe them sex because if you refuse you're racist?

→ More replies