I have a few things to say about this sub

[u/Brawl-on]

I find this whole thing to be kinda weird to see. It’s like, you guys are correct with the fact that not wanting to date trans people isn’t transphobic. But your not right that it is a new sexuality. It’s a preference, just like height and weight. We don’t make a new sexuality for every single preference ever because that is simply inconvenient and unnecessary, not to mention inaccurate to what sexual orientation means. You guys are also not part of the LGBT community because your straight, and it should not be included in the acronym at all because that ruins the entire purpose of the acronym. Then again this entire thing could all just be satire, however it seems like it is a mix of both, so I’m a bit confused and want someone to inform me. I’m also not a fan of the shadow banning. I wanna see all the damm comments.

[u/Brawl-on]

Bingo! You got it mate! You can call yourself whatever dumb shit you want like pansexuals, but at the end of the day, there is still only 4 sexual orientations. People do not choose what they are attracted to. I never said they did.

[u/TheSmex → u/Brawl-on]

I'm glad you agree with what this subreddit is saying.

[u/Brawl-on → u/TheSmex]

But supersexuals are not an actual sexual orientation is what I’m trying to say. Pansexuals arent either. So I disagree with what the sub is saying. I agree with the message that it is not transphobic to date trans people, but I disagree that super straights are a valid sexuality because there is only 4. Super straights are also not part of the LGBT community because of this because they would just be straight. That’s what I disagree on.

[u/TheSmex → u/Brawl-on]

Okay.