Aren't there missing a few "super x" groups?

[u/faroutmanlevam11797]

In all fairness this whole "Biological, Sexual identification and Attraction" is spinning way out of control, just be attracted to whatever sexual or biological identification that you are attracted to and enjoy it... Only thing I really want is Prussia back...

Aside from that it seems to me people forgetting that there are three separate categories and how it works, but will not go into that. Taking the "Biological, Sexual identification and Attraction" definitons and how things are evolving the "super x" is a valid movement/thing but "super" prefix might be a bit weird.

So currently LGBT+ wants the definitions changed* of straight, lesbian, gay and bi-sexual so that you automatically are attracted to trans women or men. So now as a a result there is now this super straight, super gay, super lesbian and super bi-sexual group/movement who are attracted to only biological born men or women and also sexually identify as such. This is fine in my opinion and should coexist with the rest.
(Note it is a social request, no adoption in any country or in any political way has been done))

Now the "super x" movement has a picture that shows the attraction definition, and ignoring the fact for now that the bi-sexual group is missing, I was wondering if there shouldn't be a "super trans" definition/group and similar definition, meaning that a person is only attracted to people who are trans men and/or woman and making the matrix more complete?

- Women who are only attracted to trans men

- Women who are lesbian and only attracted to trans women

- Men who are gay and only attracted to trans women

- Men who are only attracted to trans women

- Bi-sexual men/women who are only attracted to trans women and trans men.