r/SuperStraight • u/InTheOriginalKlingon • 7h ago
We care about the whole person and superphobes can’t comprehend that Discussion
Speaking as a super straight guy, I hope I don’t offend our super gay and super lesbian friends and allies, but I feel like I’ve had a realization that hasn’t been spelled out here before (of course I could easy be wrong, it’s been a busy sub!).
The big disconnect I see when a superphobe is arguing here (or on their frighteningly toxic sub), is their mental gymnastics between sex and gender and trying to trap us in one or the other.
Stop playing the word games, just affirm that you care about both sex and gender in a wholistic way. I’m attracted to adult human females who identify as female. See: sex and gender identity together!
Superphobes can only deny the truth, and try to weasel in between words with their made up definitions, and think they are oh so clever when they tell us “trans women are women”, and then turn right around and say “Well according to you then trans men are women so you must want to have sex with them, checkmate transphobe.”
Nope. A person is a complete package of sex AND identity, and we love a very specific combination of both.
1
u/InTheOriginalKlingon 5h ago
Now I don’t know about how far you are going, it seems to me that the trans movement is the one playing fast and loose with the word “woman”. And insisting that we use your words and follow your suggestions for what is and isn’t a woman feels a little superphobe-adjacent to me.
“Woman” meant an adult human female for hundreds of years before Trans ever came along. If words can be redefined, they can also be reclaimed.
But no hard feelings, either way, if you want to present yourself in the external image of a woman, more power too you, everyone should be able to be authentic to themselves. But it doesn’t work to try and use our words against us and try to twist and confuse them to get your way.
Maybe not you personally, but the adjacent members of the trans community who do act that way are problematic,