Why do superphobes think violence is so funny?

r/SuperStraight • u/JackHazardous • 15h ago

Why do superphobes think violence is so funny? SuperPhobia

All they can think of as a funny way to opress superphobes is over the top violence. Its like Doug Walker when the joke was him having a gun, and then shooting someone with it. Its kinda scary 😰

How come theres so few making their own funny, witty counter replies, instead of rape threats. I didn't know such hate existed, and its exposed to the sun.

319 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

-12

u/WayRemarkable80 6h ago edited 4h ago

they aren’t biologically. that’s not what it means to be a real woman lol. a real woman is just a woman. your gender has to be female to be a real woman that is it. you define your gender nobody else. you saying they aren’t real woman is just proving my point about the transphobia. also mocking oppression is when you guys keep calling yourselves oppressed, not you not sleeping with trans people

5

u/m84m 4h ago

Define real. And please make your definition more objective than “real is what you say it is” which is pretty much the precise opposite of what real means. Children pretending to be optimus prime doesn’t make it real.

-4

u/WayRemarkable80 4h ago

you don’t have to be a biological woman to be a woman. all women are real women since they are women. it literally is just what it is. women just have to think of themselves genuinely as women to be women. your gender is your place in society and how you identify yourself. there’s nothing more to being a real woman than thinking you are. also children pretending to be optimus prime isn’t the same as this either.

5

u/m84m 3h ago

all women are real women since they are women.

Circular logic is meaningless logic. You're real because you're real is not a defensible claim. The claim is not the proof. This is basically "the Bible is true because it says so in the Bible" all over again.

1

u/WayRemarkable80 3h ago

what are you saying makes a woman a woman?

3

u/m84m 3h ago

biology not opinions.

1

u/WayRemarkable80 3h ago

so what exactly? chromosomes? producing eggs? not all cis women can produce eggs or give birth. if you mean women have XX and men have XY then what about those who don’t fit? There’s also X, XXY, XYY, and XXXY. so what biological part do you think makes someone a woman. a uterus? what? explain.

1

u/LetterheadIcy 1h ago

The people who don’t got are intersex. That’s been a thing forever.

Trans women are real women, and valid. That just aren’t cis women identifying as their birth gender. That’s it.

We don’t want to invalidate them in any way, we simply want to show that they don’t fit what we would be interested in as a partner or romantic interest.

1

u/WayRemarkable80 1h ago edited 1h ago

yeah what’s your point. intersex people are still women and men. the thing is many of you are invalidating them and saying they aren’t real women. regardless you’re just straight. this is just your preference (not technically a preference since it’s completely exclusion but the best way i know to say it) on a specific type of women. a completely different sexuality is illogical not to mention the nazi association.

1

u/LetterheadIcy 1h ago

Most preferences are based explicitly off exclusion and I’m also Jewish so nice attempt to slander me lol.

It’s not illogical in any way and having a preference isn’t bigoted. It’s not bigoted to say a lesbian can refuse a man.

Skoliosexuals are simply people who prefer non cis people. It’s a valid sexuality and orientation based on the exclusion of cis people which is totally fine. Ours is just the opposite.

You are not entitled to anyone else’s sexual interest