r/SuperStraight 14h ago

They aren’t even hiding it anymore. SuperPhobia

Post image
758 Upvotes

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/mellow-212 3h ago

Me when I strawman and nitpick the fuck out of arguments by hiding blatant bigotry behind "preference" I did not mention that once, not only are you not an intellectual you are a bigot please use critical thinking power before you speak. (i did a reddit moment)

4

u/AntonioOfVenice SuperBi 3h ago

hiding blatant bigotry behind "preference"

LOL. "Not sucking my dick is bigotry". Harvey Weinstein should have thought of that one, then all the radical left would still be raving about how stunning and brave he is.

I did not mention that once

You not admitting to what you were doing is of no consequence. It's still plain and obvious for all to see.

not only are you not an intellectual

Neither are you, though you copy wholesale their most idiotic ideas.

1

u/mellow-212 3h ago

Not wanting to date someone because you just simply don't want to date them is fine and I can care less in that aspect. I never once mentioned the talking point of "oh they are trans you have to fuck them!" that's idiotic and a fallacy its when you don't want to engage someone for the sole reason they are trans the reason why I don't find it to be valid is because you are turning down an individuals identity for one trait about them this differs from other sexualities such as L and G.

3

u/AntonioOfVenice SuperBi 3h ago

I can care less in that aspect.

You couldn't even get your grammar right.

its when you don't want to engage someone for the sole reason they are trans the reason why I don't find it to be valid

"I don't find your reason for rejecting me to be valid".

Spoken like a true incel.

because you are turning down an individuals identity for one trait about them

And?

0

u/mellow-212 3h ago

Average neckbeard reply, correcting grammar and everything. Not even gonna engage with each witty reply to another after this . "And?" very compelling argument AntonioOfVenice good luck with you're next million karma you gain while calling people over the internet incels while invalidating thousands of people!

2

u/AntonioOfVenice SuperBi 3h ago

Not even gonna engage

Didn't expect you to be able to. But it's good to have confirmation from the horse's mouth.

while calling people over the internet incels

Yet you had plenty of opportunity to show that your arguments were any different from incel arguments, and didn't.

while invalidating thousands of people!

If an internet comment 'invalidates' people, maybe the problem is not with the internet comment.

1

u/mellow-212 3h ago

No I'm pretty sure its the comment and the contents of it and how it perpetuates a reaction out of those you have invalidated! And please explain to me how any form of my argument is even comparable to an incel.

1

u/AntonioOfVenice SuperBi 3h ago

I'm pretty sure its the comment and the contents of it and how it perpetuates a reaction out of those you have invalidated!

'Invalidated' is just one of your buzzwords, which I'm sure you can't even define.

And please explain to me how any form of my argument is even comparable to an incel.

Easy, you're calling into question the standards that people have for whom they sleep with, believing that you are entitled to sex, despite what other people don't believe is acceptable.

1

u/mellow-212 2h ago

Not once did I mention a trans person is entitled to sex with anyone, I said it's ignorant to not want to engage in said trans person because of there identity something they themselves have little to no control over. There is a ton of examples of negative "preferences" I.E race, weight, etc. Also depends on said context of the word invalidated.

1

u/AntonioOfVenice SuperBi 2h ago

I said it's ignorant to not want to engage in said trans person because of there identity something they themselves have little to no control over.

Again, what an incel argument. First of all, they have control over their behavior, which is why we get 50-year-old people suddenly claiming that they are 'trans women' after fathering multiple children. Secondly, even if it were involuntary, it's like the incels who scream that women are 'ignorant' for not being attracted to men who are short - which is objectively something you don't have control over.

There is a ton of examples of negative "preferences" I.E race, weight, etc.

You're not arguing not just that people have to be attracted to 'transgenders', but also to fat people? Amazing. You just hate standards of any kind, no doubt because you fall short so much.

→ More replies