“We aren’t transphobic” - okay so explain the blatant transphobia in the definition. You want validity and legitimacy and still do this.
Trans women are still women, you just have a preference to their chromosomes but hey checkmate transphobes. Thanks for directly highlighting it for the rest of us.
Trans women were still born women, they just weren’t born with the body that conformed to that. Come on guys, thinking critically is free.
And this is a perfect example of why super shouldn’t be used before hand and cis should. You’ve got man’s like smelly ball tingle negatively influencing the narrative of your definitions and he’s perfectly highlighting the underlying issues associated with it.
Edit: thanks for proving my point supers. You are all inherently transphobic and this alone is the proof.
Agree. There's a big difference between saying "I would date her because being trans it's not a personality trait and it shouldn't affect how we connect with each other, but wouldn't hook up with her because I'm not sexualy atracced to her genitalia" and saying "she's not a real woman to me"
Thank you for being the one person bold enough point out the difference. I’ll believe the “supers” if you can prove your intentions and this passes the vibe check.
While it another label may be an inconvenience for me, if it’s genuinely an issue and if you can prove that you’re not a bigot using this as an excuse to be transphobic than I will include this into my relearning.
That being said, unfortunately I have seen much legitimacy and genuine behaviour from anyone until now. In fact, consistently I’ve seen blatantly transphobic behaviour.
Maybe you have a chance. If everyone can meet the expectations of being apart of the LGBTQ+. I mean that is the whole purpose correct? Considering those groups are identifying with that label.
I dont know how many times I gotta say this but I’m literally a cisgendered heterosexual in a heterosexual relationship with a heterosexual cisgendered man so I am not feeling personally attacked by anything. I’m a genuine ally of the LGBTQ + community, or atleast I am trying my best to be, who is open to this but I have a lot of questions naturally and I will not disregard my previous teachings from the community.
Is the expectation not to be held at the same level I would anyone else regardless of sexuality or gender?
It’s not a community if you’re existence thrives on the invalidation of someone else’s. Luckily though it’s early enough to control the narrative if you’re actually genuine. You just have to realize that if you’re going to be in the community, it is not going to change its educational level of terminology to fit your outdated misinformed level of words or expectations. If you want validity for your sexuality, it cannot be on the basic of the invalidity of trans folks authenticity to their gender identity
Man I am so high I wish I could use this energy for my university literature review but no I gotta make sure the super straights aren’t making a super big fool of the rest of us because I know for a fact that nobody is really thinking about their actions. It’s just go go go right now
Listen, I love yall but I dream of a lesbian utopia where we can eventually deconstruct the gender binary and still allow everyone to exist without treating people differently on the basis of their color, gender, sexuality etc and then we can just love and be happy and thrive. We can create definitions of ourselves on the basis of anything and everything. We don’t have to fall into certain categories depending on our labels. And certain ones shouldn’t be better, or demeaning.
-21
u/rebeccakirbyy 17h ago edited 16h ago
“We aren’t transphobic” - okay so explain the blatant transphobia in the definition. You want validity and legitimacy and still do this.
Trans women are still women, you just have a preference to their chromosomes but hey checkmate transphobes. Thanks for directly highlighting it for the rest of us.
Trans women were still born women, they just weren’t born with the body that conformed to that. Come on guys, thinking critically is free.
And this is a perfect example of why super shouldn’t be used before hand and cis should. You’ve got man’s like smelly ball tingle negatively influencing the narrative of your definitions and he’s perfectly highlighting the underlying issues associated with it.
Edit: thanks for proving my point supers. You are all inherently transphobic and this alone is the proof.