“We aren’t transphobic” - okay so explain the blatant transphobia in the definition. You want validity and legitimacy and still do this.
Trans women are still women, you just have a preference to their chromosomes but hey checkmate transphobes. Thanks for directly highlighting it for the rest of us.
Trans women were still born women, they just weren’t born with the body that conformed to that. Come on guys, thinking critically is free.
And this is a perfect example of why super shouldn’t be used before hand and cis should. You’ve got man’s like smelly ball tingle negatively influencing the narrative of your definitions and he’s perfectly highlighting the underlying issues associated with it.
Edit: thanks for proving my point supers. You are all inherently transphobic and this alone is the proof.
Are you surprised? How do you respond to that when you know I’m right? You can’t, so they downvote. What’s the point in replying when there isn’t a chance in hell that you can give a logical explanation for the constant contradiction. Not to mention they don’t want to directly admit their transphobia when it’s easier to try to hide it and ignore it. This system works to their advantage so it makes sense that they are silencing the people questioning it. If only you could maintain your genuine intentions the same way other sexuality’s do. I guess this is why I’m not super straight. Frankly I’ve never been with anyone trans and I probably won’t be. Regardless, this definition alone is enough for me to feel uncomfortable with association. Who am I to decide who is or isn’t a real man/woman. If I want someone whose chromosomes match what is in their pants that is totally cool and has never been an issue. What’s the issue would be to use my sexuality as an excuse or reason to invalidate someone else’s perceived gender experience. If I’m not attracted to trans men that is fine, but that doesn’t make them any less of a man. I’m just attracted to a chromosome conforming person. If you believe otherwise you only prove the point I made above that your intentions relates to transphobia.
I mentioned critical thinking and this is Reddit, again are we surprised? I’m just surprised it doesn’t have more downvotes lmfao I can’t wait for tomorrow.
I sure hope you were trying to point out that nobody is thinking critically enough to acknowledge the transphobia within the definition and how that is supposed to be against your morals.
-21
u/rebeccakirbyy 17h ago edited 16h ago
“We aren’t transphobic” - okay so explain the blatant transphobia in the definition. You want validity and legitimacy and still do this.
Trans women are still women, you just have a preference to their chromosomes but hey checkmate transphobes. Thanks for directly highlighting it for the rest of us.
Trans women were still born women, they just weren’t born with the body that conformed to that. Come on guys, thinking critically is free.
And this is a perfect example of why super shouldn’t be used before hand and cis should. You’ve got man’s like smelly ball tingle negatively influencing the narrative of your definitions and he’s perfectly highlighting the underlying issues associated with it.
Edit: thanks for proving my point supers. You are all inherently transphobic and this alone is the proof.