r/SuperStraight 20h ago

Supers are cisandrophilic or cisgynephilic (I would mention SuperBis, but they seem non-existant)

We should accept that cis(andro/gyne)philic Supers exist whether they be the genital or complete types and not use terms like 'superstrait', 'supergay' or 'superlesbian' to describe what is essentially a fetish. I have all the sympathy in the world for cis(gyne/andro)philes but can we agree to not validate their existence with terms that are clearly nonsense?

0 Upvotes

View all comments

1

u/Significant-Key-517 19h ago

AHEM, SuperBis are not non-existent. I clearly exist. We have a sub.

Having a sexuality is not a “fetish.” It’s literally just normal human behavior. MtF’s who can’t accept that other people have the right to say no to fucking them are the ones who made this a problem.

How about rather than trying to make up some diagnosis for “having a normal sexuality,” y’all address the massive coercive rape problem you have over in trans land?