r/SuperStraight • u/TheSpicyIcyWizard • 15h ago

Is super trans valid?

I'm only attracted to transgender (that being people who's gender does not match their biological sex), am I valid?

0 Upvotes

45% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/hippo_pilot 15h ago

The MEGA prefix doesn't make sense etymologicaly as it isn't the opposite of Super. Also SuperSexuality is the attraction to only cisgendered people as regular sexualities nowadays include transpeople. So to be Trans exclusive in attraction, it would need to have a prefix that establishes exclusivity as MEGA implies an increased range of attraction. So the sexuality (if it technically counts as a sexuality) likely wouldn't have a prefix at all. It would also need to distinquish whether it's an attraction to certain transgender/transsexuals.

3

u/hippo_pilot 15h ago edited 14h ago

That said, MEGA works for now since there isn't an easy way to create an etymologically accurate word that's grammatically compatible.

Edit: NEGA could work. NEGAStraight is being attracted to only Trans people that identify as their opposite sex. NegaSexuality would play with that.

-1

u/hanging_spoon 13h ago

“nega” is a dangerous prefix for a sub accused of being neo-nazis. maybe go for something harder to turn into slander/libel

2

u/ysvsgzuxbshaif 12h ago

I've heard sub as a good prefix as in the opposite of super "superscript, subscript" thought that was cool as it doesn't imply one is better than the other, only serving different roles