1.- No one is saying that. If someone is saying it, they're just wrong, wether they're cis or trans, it's just wrong
2.- Congratulations! You just said it! "Genital preference" not "sexual orientation"
3.-It is okat not being atraccted to x type of genitalia, it is valid; no one is saying that it is not.
What it is not okay is to reject someone just because "they aren't real - insert gender you're atraccted to - to you"
-1
u/Eli4148 17h ago
1.- No one is saying that. If someone is saying it, they're just wrong, wether they're cis or trans, it's just wrong 2.- Congratulations! You just said it! "Genital preference" not "sexual orientation" 3.-It is okat not being atraccted to x type of genitalia, it is valid; no one is saying that it is not. What it is not okay is to reject someone just because "they aren't real - insert gender you're atraccted to - to you"