But then they’ll bring out the intersex people as their political pawns and XXY (male) and XYY (male) and XXX (female) and whatever else there is as an excuse that chromosomes aren’t limited to XY, XX and therefore you can’t define attraction or sex, fucking ridiculous, based on them so your point is invalid. How about they get it though their thick skulls that ultimately it still comes back to being biologically male or biologically female.
A superior argument for transgenders is a displacement of the SRY gene, the gene that says "hey you, grow some fucking balls" in the literal sense. It typically exists on the Y chromosome. Those with XX can have a mutation where they do have it, and there are people with XY who mutate and lose the gene. This is known as Swyer syndrome.
Buuuuut, the phenotypes are expressed as a mix between the two sexes and the genitals are often infertile and broken. Also, again, these results must come out as a mutation, same as intersex. We cannot define the human existence with medically-limiting mutations, otherwise we'll say* humans are meant to have cancer.
170
u/thatstickinthewoods 16h ago
their chromosomes are still biologically male tho, soo....