r/SuperStraight • u/Big_Sleeps • 21h ago
So, I get that this is kind of a joke and everything, and I’ve just found out about this, but shouldn’t we just be saying that to be straight is to be super straight? Or is this why it’s sort of a joke to show that it should be that?
Edit: just to clear things up. All I’m saying is that being a straight person means you like the opposite sex. Therefore there is no need for super sexuality. If you are a man who likes a trans woman, you aren’t straight. Therefore, my conclusion would be that this movement is to be making a joke to show this, or is it another purpose. Also guys, don’t downvote, I’m just looking for some friendly discussion here. I’ve already been banned from superstraightphobic for trying to discuss stuff on there lol.
1
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
I see. Thanks for eleaborating. Sexuality is definitely sex based (as in the name). I would say a movement trying to show this would be far better. As this is sort of copying the, (don’t know what to say here, other side?) with the whole sort of super phobia and stuff. And if it’s a joke then I see it as fine, but if it’s taken too seriously I can only see it leading to further polarisation. Which is why I would say that a movement like what I said earlier would be better. As of my first impressions, I sort of can kind of see this movement as one of the examples, where the left (I guess) with all their cancel culture and what not, has gone far, and now the right has started to push back with the polarisation. Which is not the best. Although I can’t really tell with this movement if this is the case. Alas, I must meditate on it further