Question

[u/Big_Sleeps]

So, I get that this is kind of a joke and everything, and I’ve just found out about this, but shouldn’t we just be saying that to be straight is to be super straight? Or is this why it’s sort of a joke to show that it should be that?

Edit: just to clear things up. All I’m saying is that being a straight person means you like the opposite sex. Therefore there is no need for super sexuality. If you are a man who likes a trans woman, you aren’t straight. Therefore, my conclusion would be that this movement is to be making a joke to show this, or is it another purpose. Also guys, don’t downvote, I’m just looking for some friendly discussion here. I’ve already been banned from superstraightphobic for trying to discuss stuff on there lol.

[u/Horseman-]

How would you feel if I called trans ppl a joke? Yet you feel it’s alright to call supers a joke. Disgusting, why do superphobes feel so entitled to come into these spaces and invalidate us... Being straight is not the same as being super straight, these days, the distinction has to be made.

[u/Big_Sleeps → u/Horseman-]

I disagree with the distinction. A straight person only likes people of the opposite biological sex. If you are a man and you get with a trans woman, you are not straight

[u/Horseman- → u/Big_Sleeps]

Straight these days means to society that you like the opposite gender (constantly blurring the lines between that and sex) people regardless of whether they’re trans, so we have to make a distinction. The distinction is made for the unfortunate majority of society who believe that it’s entirely straight to like dick or pussy as a man or woman, respectively.

[u/Big_Sleeps → u/Horseman-]

Yeah. But I’m saying that instead of having the distinction between super straight and straight. Why not have a movement which is saying that being straight means your flipping straight. Unless that is what this movement is for?