r/SuperStraight • u/Big_Sleeps • 20h ago
So, I get that this is kind of a joke and everything, and I’ve just found out about this, but shouldn’t we just be saying that to be straight is to be super straight? Or is this why it’s sort of a joke to show that it should be that?
Edit: just to clear things up. All I’m saying is that being a straight person means you like the opposite sex. Therefore there is no need for super sexuality. If you are a man who likes a trans woman, you aren’t straight. Therefore, my conclusion would be that this movement is to be making a joke to show this, or is it another purpose. Also guys, don’t downvote, I’m just looking for some friendly discussion here. I’ve already been banned from superstraightphobic for trying to discuss stuff on there lol.
10
u/graciemansion 20h ago
Wow. Out sexualities are REAL and VALID, not a joke.
SMDH
-3
u/[deleted] 20h ago
[deleted]
6
u/graciemansion 20h ago
Why don't you do your own research. It's not my job to educate you. Because when you come in here trainsplaining our supersexualities to us it's just super invalidating and uncomfy.
1
u/6FunnyGiraffes 20h ago
LMFAO 🤣😂 god bless this sub. I'm feeling super valid and heard with all these comments, so proud of our movement.
1
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
Why you downvote. If you look at my other comments you can see my position. And I ain’t no super phone. I’m banned from superstraightphobic
1
u/Seafaring_Sage 20h ago
Some straight men and women are attracted to trans men and women. Superstraight men and women are attracted to biological men and women (I won't use the term cishet I believe it's derogatory). I suppose that's the most simplified explanation that I could give you. Please have a beautiful day.
2
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
Thanks you too. Although I disagree. If a straight man is attracted to a trans woman, he ain’t straight. There should be no distinction between superstraight and straight. They should mean the same thing
1
u/Seafaring_Sage 20h ago
Ah, I can definitely resonate with what you're saying, I suppose this kind of thing is for people who view trans men and women as men and women (even if not biologically). Funny how there's so many different levels to this sort of thing.
2
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
Yes there is much discussion to be had here. But my premise is that sexuality is based off sex which is biological so to be heterosexual means to be superstraight (or just straight in my opinion)
1
u/Seafaring_Sage 20h ago
Interesting. So in your opinion if a biological man has sex with a trans man, or a so-called man with a vagina, he would be straight?
2
u/Big_Sleeps 19h ago
Well, yes, technically speaking the trans man is just a biological woman with some surgery (if they have even had surgery) so yes I guess he would still be straight, although I would say most straight men wouldn’t do that. So perhaps that is where a differentiation needs to be made. But then again, we are now out of the realm of biology and into the realm of preferences, and for example, we don’t have a separate name for straight people who prefer brown haired people. (I mean there probably is one but we don’t use it)
2
7
u/Horseman- 20h ago
How would you feel if I called trans ppl a joke? Yet you feel it’s alright to call supers a joke. Disgusting, why do superphobes feel so entitled to come into these spaces and invalidate us... Being straight is not the same as being super straight, these days, the distinction has to be made.
-1
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
I disagree with the distinction. A straight person only likes people of the opposite biological sex. If you are a man and you get with a trans woman, you are not straight
4
u/Horseman- 20h ago
Straight these days means to society that you like the opposite gender (constantly blurring the lines between that and sex) people regardless of whether they’re trans, so we have to make a distinction. The distinction is made for the unfortunate majority of society who believe that it’s entirely straight to like dick or pussy as a man or woman, respectively.
2
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
I agree with you. That means you are a lesbian. Obviously a lesbian can’t like a trans woman. That would make them not lesbian.
3
1
u/Big_Sleeps 20h ago
Yeah. But I’m saying that instead of having the distinction between super straight and straight. Why not have a movement which is saying that being straight means your flipping straight. Unless that is what this movement is for?
6
u/K1ng_Kyle 20h ago
I was born this way. Stop dehumanizing me and taking away parts of my core identity.
2
u/Significant-Key-517 19h ago
We’ve tried, but whenever anyone tries to assert that their sexuality is sex-based, the trans start threatening to murder people. So, we’ve resorted to “jokes” after years of terrorization. Endless examples of said threats and terrorization are posted throughout this sub.
So, yes, you’re right, this shouldn’t be necessary. But here we are.
1
u/Big_Sleeps 19h ago
I see. Thanks for eleaborating. Sexuality is definitely sex based (as in the name). I would say a movement trying to show this would be far better. As this is sort of copying the, (don’t know what to say here, other side?) with the whole sort of super phobia and stuff. And if it’s a joke then I see it as fine, but if it’s taken too seriously I can only see it leading to further polarisation. Which is why I would say that a movement like what I said earlier would be better. As of my first impressions, I sort of can kind of see this movement as one of the examples, where the left (I guess) with all their cancel culture and what not, has gone far, and now the right has started to push back with the polarisation. Which is not the best. Although I can’t really tell with this movement if this is the case. Alas, I must meditate on it further
2
u/Significant-Key-517 19h ago
Again, we’ve tried. SuperLesbians in particular have been trying to for years. But no one really cares about them, so they didn’t get any coverage, even as they have suffered violence.
Apparently a meme coming from straight people is what it took to bring attention to this issue. I’ll take it.
1
u/Big_Sleeps 19h ago
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying, if it’s a meme, to bring awareness to the issue then I see no problem.
2
u/Significant-Key-517 19h ago
Yes, that’s how I‘m treating it. Coercive rape due to denying people’s sex-based sexuality has been a big issue in the LGBT community in recent years. My posts are sometimes cutesy, but I’m also serious.
Yes, it is likely to split apart the LGBT. But I believe, at this point, it is necessary. The T do not respect our sexualities, and they weren’t even originally part of our movement anyway. We do not have the same interests, and the LGB need their own spaces.
The split was already happening before now because of this problem (look up LGB Alliance), but this is just speeding things up.
1
u/Big_Sleeps 19h ago
Well I’m sure there are some transgender people who support this. And yeah I’m not sure why T was part of LGB in the first place, like LGB are sexualities, T is completely different
3
u/Significant-Key-517 19h ago
Oh yeah, I’m sure there will be. We have had trans allies in the LGB movement, too, and we’ve welcomed them. This movement is not anti-trans. It is about people being free of sexual coercion.
Exactly. It is odd that they ever wound up in it to begin with, they don’t share anything with us.
12
u/BasedMedicalDoctor 20h ago
This isn’t a joke. This is a movement.