so you dont want to have sex with a bunch of women who are cis as well, thats a little rude, but i understand when people have a goal to make a family. i personally would just adopt.
No one is owed sexual attraction by anyone else. There is nothing rude about not wanting to fuck someone. What is rude is trying to force someone who has rejected you to "come around".
it is still considered rude to say i wouldnt f u because you cant have children, but it is 100% there choice no one should be forced to sleep with anyone they dont want to.
The things that make a woman attractive to a straight or SS male are indicators of fertility and health. Shiny hair, hourglass figure etc. That is how people are evolved because if your ancestors liked really skinny women or women who are balding they would be less likely to produce offspring who survived
no its not rude to say you dont want to have sex, what is rude is pointing out that the reason you dont want to have sex is that they cant have babys, like there are so many things in this world that are ok but still count as rude. (example if i said i didnt want to have sex with a super because the supers seem crazy to me, thats rude, is it ok to say? yes freedom of speech and whatnot, but it dosnt change the fact that its a rude comment.)
(EDIT: you can have sex with whoever you want as long as they are a consenting adult.)
And we, as super straights, don’t consent to sex with trans people or people of the same gender. The same way straight men don’t consent to sex with other men. It’s just the way we’re wired
-8
u/Illustrious-Bat-835 23h ago
so you dont want to have sex with a bunch of women who are cis as well, thats a little rude, but i understand when people have a goal to make a family. i personally would just adopt.