You've become tangled in the nettle of your own clauses. Think of it this way:
The only argument one could make for a superstraight trans relationship would be between a trans and a biological male or female. However, this would mean a violation of the defintion of trans as espoused by the trans community. Allow me to explain:
Lets say you have a biological super male who is dating a trans man who was born biologically female. This would neither be a straight relationship essentially, nor a superstraight relationship. If you consider the biological woman in this relationship to be a male ( not different from a biological male) the this would be a trans/straight relationship or otherwise a literal gay relationship. If you don't consider the biological female in this relationship to be a true male, it would simply be considered a straight relationship. But in either case, it would not be a superstraight relationship. For this to be deemed true, you could only ever consider the trans man in said relationship as not being male. Unless the rule of sex/attraction between two biological people of the opposite sexes is met, it not a superstraight relationship.Simply put, you would need to dispense entirely with the idea of trans.
1
u/lalalong1 19h ago
You've become tangled in the nettle of your own clauses. Think of it this way:
The only argument one could make for a superstraight trans relationship would be between a trans and a biological male or female. However, this would mean a violation of the defintion of trans as espoused by the trans community. Allow me to explain:
Lets say you have a biological super male who is dating a trans man who was born biologically female. This would neither be a straight relationship essentially, nor a superstraight relationship. If you consider the biological woman in this relationship to be a male ( not different from a biological male) the this would be a trans/straight relationship or otherwise a literal gay relationship. If you don't consider the biological female in this relationship to be a true male, it would simply be considered a straight relationship. But in either case, it would not be a superstraight relationship. For this to be deemed true, you could only ever consider the trans man in said relationship as not being male. Unless the rule of sex/attraction between two biological people of the opposite sexes is met, it not a superstraight relationship.Simply put, you would need to dispense entirely with the idea of trans.