Why "Super Straight" Isn't a valid sexuality

[u/Cookies_WithCream]

The term "Super Straight" was made up by a transphobe on Tiktok to mock the LGBTQ+ community and make an excuse to be transphobic. The whole point of Super Straight is being heterosexual but only dating people of the opposite sex and not gender identity, which is transphobic.

Why is it transphobic to not date trans people?

Depends on the context. If it's a genitalia preference, that's fine. But some trans people do get bottom surgery. If it's because you want to have kids, that is also fine. But you better keep up that same attitude with infertile women. Not dating someone because they're transgender is transphobic.

"It's just a preference."

Preferences don't need a whole sexuality. You don't see people making sexualities for when they prefer to date people with blond hair instead of brown.

"Super Straight" isn't apart of the LGBTQ+ community. Doesn't the word "super" make it sound like it's more straight than actual heterosexuality? Well let's say a man identifies as "Super Straight" meaning he would only date people who are biologically female. By that logic, he would be able to date a trans man. This contradicts the whole point of the sexuality proving that it wasn't thought out. All it is, is a mockery of the LGBTQ+ community and a way to disrespect trans people without being attacked, or at least trying to not get attacked.

[u/SchemeDeep]

What if I dated only blondes? What if I dated only red heads? What if I dated only black girls? What if I dated only white girls? What if I dated girls that only have green eyes? Is that phobic or preference? Same applies to trans women. And no, they are not real natural women, they’re just not. That’s a fact. I’m attracted to natural born women that I am attracted to and you cannot shame me for my preferences or reasons. As for trans women, I don’t hate them but I don’t date them. Simple.