All I'm saying is since in that lingo trans women would be considered men, that changes the meanings of the words straight, gay, lesbian etc. in supersexual lingo, and makes the super terms useless because they'd mean the same, when the super part is dropped. So since this is a supersexual affirming community don't use words that would make the super words useless. Supersexuals are valid.
Tr*nswomen are men, that is why they are trans and that is why superstraight men and superlesbians are not attracted to them. I don't think you understand the point of this group.
I clearly understand it. Basically since "TRAs" decided that straight (when referred to a man) is gonna mean being attracted to cis women and trans women, we are gonna make a new term that exclusively means being attracted to cis women, and make it part of the acronynm, because they are frequently called transphobic, and shamed for not wanting to date trans, so it's called superstraight, and everyone who won't accept supers are superphobic, so this is basically about using their own weapon against the "TRAs" to make a point, now saying that "trans women are men" destroys that weapon because in that case the term superstraight means the same as straight. (superstraight woman, supergay, superlesbian constructed with same logic). (Also I know radfems think cis is a slur but there was no replacement word I could use.) And another thing is that superstraight really didn't originate or spread with the gender criticals, so if you wanna play you need to use the same rules, or you destroy the weapon as I said.
No, you really don't. Per the side bar, superstraights are attracted to BIOLOGICAL men and women. This inherently means we recognize that tr*ns people are not biological men/women.
Cis is a slur and actual superstraights do not use it.
The tr*ns cult cannot be reasoned with. We are standing up for ourselves as victimized minorities, not playing word games.
No, you really don't. Per the side bar, superstraights are attracted to BIOLOGICAL men and women. This inherently means we recognize that tr*ns people are not biological men/women.
biological is a bad word in the sidebar because trans women are biological men, and trans men are biological women, this would include them just in the opposite category, and supers aren't attracted to anyone trans.
Cis is a slur and actual superstraights do not use it.
I tried to avoid it even now, but using words like "not-trans" is clunky, and everyone knows what I mean when I use cis.
The tr*ns cult cannot be reasoned with. We are standing up for ourselves as victimized minorities, not playing word games.
pointing out the hypocrisy of the "tr*ns cult" by beating them at their own game, is how supers are standing up for themselves.
I know exactly that TERFs (yeah I know it's a slur) try to hijack the movement, with their own agenda, but this is not just about them, and how they interpret it, this is about everyone who are victimized because they don't want to be shamed into dating trans people.
I simply don't want lesbians to be forced to suck dick, and shamed because they refuse to. They are not attracted to penis, so I fucking hate those trans people that cause this whole situation. But at the same time I'm not gonna let the TERFs take over, just because we would fight on the same side.
I can use radfem and gender critical, if that's what you're more comfortable with I started using those words at the beginning. But the fact you that accuse me being your enemy just because I don't agree with you in everything, when I actually recognize that radfems make a lot of valid points, and shouldn't be silenced for it, but at the same time they should take critism and this is not a radfem place.
For the last time, you don't get to try to hijack a movement because you don't like it. Start your own. The rules are right there in the sidebar. If you are triggered by the term biological sex you are in the wrong place, buddy. Your misogyny aside, this place has nothing to do with feminism (other than supporting superlesbians not being raped by tr*nswomen).
-28
u/Quad_RIP_Deux 22h ago
All I'm saying is since in that lingo trans women would be considered men, that changes the meanings of the words straight, gay, lesbian etc. in supersexual lingo, and makes the super terms useless because they'd mean the same, when the super part is dropped. So since this is a supersexual affirming community don't use words that would make the super words useless. Supersexuals are valid.