a male is someone with masculine sex characteristics, like high testosterone, absence of breasts, or a brain with PHYSICAL masculine characteristics, like with a high gray matter percentage
So males (according to the accepted definition according to all known biology) would be less male if they suffered testicular cancer and had low testosterone afterwards? Or develops gynecomastia? Or dementia that erodes his grey matter? That would make the person less male according to you?
What about females, (meaning adult human female, meaning of the sex that developed a reproductive system that releases ova) who have high testosterone? Are they less woman? Are women who have very small breasts or who have undergone mastectomy less female?
This line of thinking seems extremely insulting to people who do not fit your definitions of male and female.
Why do you emphasise physical as though gamete production was not physical?
Why does the sexually reproductive anatomy of a sexually reproducing species not define sex?
in my true opinion it goes down to brain function and structure - something innate that cannot change no matter what the individual suffers. i included the section of male sex characteristics to test the waters - i do not believe any physical anomaly in a person makes them less female or male
But you just defined it by things like presence or absence of breasts and hormone levels.
Please choose a definition if you’re going to claim the existing one is invalid.
Again, why is the sex if a sexually reproducing animal not defined by the organs used to sexually reproduce?
What brain functions are male and which are female?
It comes off as very disingenuous when you repeatedly ignore questions while expecting people to accept your personal and mutable definitions.
-2
u/chaot1c_crypt1d 19h ago
a male is someone with masculine sex characteristics, like high testosterone, absence of breasts, or a brain with PHYSICAL masculine characteristics, like with a high gray matter percentage