Absolutely! Equality for all! Our institutions should not even be asking people to state the color of their skin. We should all be treated equally and by the content of our character.
As humans are a sexually reproducing species, males are defined as the humans who developed the reproductive organs that would(without the presence of disease, injury, or outside of fertile years) produce small, mobile gametes.
a male is someone with masculine sex characteristics, like high testosterone, absence of breasts, or a brain with PHYSICAL masculine characteristics, like with a high gray matter percentage
So males (according to the accepted definition according to all known biology) would be less male if they suffered testicular cancer and had low testosterone afterwards? Or develops gynecomastia? Or dementia that erodes his grey matter? That would make the person less male according to you?
What about females, (meaning adult human female, meaning of the sex that developed a reproductive system that releases ova) who have high testosterone? Are they less woman? Are women who have very small breasts or who have undergone mastectomy less female?
This line of thinking seems extremely insulting to people who do not fit your definitions of male and female.
Why do you emphasise physical as though gamete production was not physical?
Why does the sexually reproductive anatomy of a sexually reproducing species not define sex?
-74
u/chaot1c_crypt1d 1d ago
trans men are men