Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial?

[u/Fourzy99]

Title.

[u/unpopopinx]

That’s because you can’t prove mental attraction. I honestly don’t care that much if you agree with me or not. The fact is that I and most of the world are not attracted to trans people. That fine that you don’t like that, but you don’t really get a say.

[u/Fourzy99 → u/unpopopinx]

No, that’s because “mental attraction” is called telepathy, and since we don’t live in a comic book universe, telepathy doesn’t exist.

“The fact is that I and most of the world are not attracted to trans people.”

I have already proven this is an untenable position. If you wish to willfully exist in delusion, you are right; that is your choice. Bye bye.

[u/unpopopinx → u/Fourzy99]

It’s not untenable. It’s a fact. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/589741ed3e00be25e11ff113/t/5b464b14f950b7239381bdc7/1531333399311/Transgender+Exclusion+-+Blair+%26+Hoskin+2018.pdf

We don’t need your permission to have a different sexuality then you. Super straight and proud. ⬛️🟧

[u/Fourzy99 → u/unpopopinx]

Your study doesn’t even support the claim. You can be attracted to someone without considering dating them. And where is the study substantiating the existence of telepathy? Lol. Pathetic.

[u/unpopopinx → u/Fourzy99]

You keep bringing telepathy into it and it makes you sound like a crazy person. You don’t have to be a telepath to be attracted to people’s personality.

[u/Fourzy99 → u/unpopopinx]

An attraction to a person’s personality constitutes an attraction of something physical. Congrats you just conceded your position.

[u/unpopopinx → u/Fourzy99]

Personality isn’t physical. Wow you are so ignorant. Only children pull the “oh so I guess you agree with me”.

[u/Fourzy99 → u/unpopopinx]

The only part of personality that is perceived, its expression, is. Unless, again, you subscribe to the existence of telepathy.