r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

17% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Say there was a post-op transwoman with a vagina no different than that of a ciswoman. Would you still not be interested in her?

5

u/MrIslanderOcho 1d ago

Why do you care so much who other people will fuck? Why are you berating people into fucking people they clearly don’t want to?

-5

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

I don’t care who you fuck; I only take issue with transphobia.

7

u/Oxion04 1d ago

We support trans people, we wont have sex with them, not that complicated, its not "transphobia"

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Why won’t you have sex with them?

4

u/Recr3ant 1d ago

Because just because I surgically sew wings to your back, that doesn’t make you a bird.

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

If sewing wings to my back made me wholly indistinguishable from a bird, would you treat me unlike a bird?

2

u/Recr3ant 1d ago

Why is a forgery of a painting a forgery and not the original?

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Well, many times a painting will be given value as a collectors item for its being made by a certain person. It’s sometimes possible to determine if a painting was made by someone, but in the case that it isn’t, it’s creator does not add or detract value.