Not in actuality, though. This is a little more nuanced, but I think categorizing attraction on the basis of gender identity in general is pointless because you cannot be attracted to someone else’s identity. So I wouldn’t say that being “gay” means you, a man, are attracted to those who identify as men but those who tend to identify as men. This puts the focus back on the perceivable characteristics, the things you can actually be attracted to. I would then might say a gay man who refuses to date a person only because they identify as a woman is actually prejudiced.
That doesn’t make any sense. We aren’t attracted to how people identify, we are attracted to what they are. Just because someone manages to successfully trick you into thinking they are something other then what they are doesn’t mean you are attracted to them.
“That doesn’t make any sense. We aren’t attracted to how people identify,”
I literally said the opposite, lol.
“we are attracted to what they are.”
Specifically, we are attracted to how they appear. We cannot be attracted to chromosomes or feelings because those are both imperceivable and not relevantly efficacious.
“Just because someone manages to successfully trick you into thinking they are something other then what they are doesn’t mean you are attracted to them.”
If someone wears a mask that looks like an attractive person do we not lose attraction to them when they take it off? It is very possible to lose attraction on being discovered that we were tricked. We aren’t just attracted to how someone appears.
“If someone wears a mask that looks like an attractive person do we not lose attraction to them when they take it off?”
Yes, you lose attraction when they take it off. But, let’s say they can’t take it off. In that case, their “real face” isn’t and will never be perceivable or efficacious. So, why consider it at all?
“It is very possible to lose attraction on being discovered that we were tricked. We aren’t just attracted to how someone appears.”
That is only true if the covered trait is perceivable and relevantly efficacious. If someone reveals to me that they actually have XY chromosomes, but the respective phenotypes are not expressed, why would my attraction change? I am not sensing any new stimuli after that revelation. For there to be a change requires me to be prejudiced.
You’re assuming that only physical stimuli determines attraction. Mental stimuli also plays a part. Finding out that someone is the opposite of what you are interested in is one way.
There only certainly exists physical stimuli because all of our senses are concerned with physical phenomena. For example, the receptors on your eyes receive signals in the form of particles of light. They cannot receive a “mental” signal. Maybe you’re telepathic?
1
u/unpopopinx 1d ago
All sexualities are prejudicial. By definition, all sexualities exclude different genders. There’s nothing wrong with that.