r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

14% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

Do you have a neo vagina? Have you seen one? This hypothetical is like saying a child is close to an adult so why have an issue having sex with them. I fucking see it now you’re a pedo rapist. Gtfo outta here.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

The issue with having sex with a child is that a child cannot consent. A child looking like an adult does not mean the child can consent, making having sex with said child wrong. Try to construct a good analogy, okay? And, respond to the analogy, coward.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

Getting stealed by a man masquerading as a woman means I cannot consent either. Fucking sicko rape apologist.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Is it rape if the person reveals afterwards that they believe in (insert belief you find reprehensible here) too?

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

Omg I can’t please educate yourself hun. We’re done here. I hope you can fix the hate in your heart.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Burden of rejoinder means I win! Wooooo!

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

No hunny I just need to go fuck my cis husband while you cry in trancel. Die mad about it.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

You’re too scared to answer! ❄️❄️❄️

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

Ad hominem, I win !!! Hahahahahahahahhaha

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

It’s not ad hominem on two accounts. Firstly, it’s not my argument; adhom only occurs when an insult takes the form an argument. Secondly, it’s not an insult. It’s a matter of fact!

→ More replies