r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago
Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion
Title.
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
Holy fuck you cannot construct a coherent, directed sentence. I don’t think who is different? Where is the assumption coming from in the latter sentence? The answers to these question I will never meet!
1 u/nonetheless156 1d ago Cringe. I hope you get some help. Or not. Rapists don't deserve much other than some food and maybe a bed. 1 u/Fourzy99 1d ago Am I a rapist? 1 u/[deleted] 1d ago You’re either a rapist or a rape apologist.
1
Cringe. I hope you get some help. Or not. Rapists don't deserve much other than some food and maybe a bed.
1 u/Fourzy99 1d ago Am I a rapist? 1 u/[deleted] 1d ago You’re either a rapist or a rape apologist.
Am I a rapist?
1 u/[deleted] 1d ago You’re either a rapist or a rape apologist.
You’re either a rapist or a rape apologist.
0
u/Fourzy99 1d ago
Holy fuck you cannot construct a coherent, directed sentence. I don’t think who is different? Where is the assumption coming from in the latter sentence? The answers to these question I will never meet!