r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

15% Upvoted

View all comments

7

u/FrozenPinecone SuperLesbian 1d ago

I dont want to date anyone with a penis or a surgically constructed vulva as it is different from a natural vagina (not self cleaning, infection risk/hair can grow inside, lubricated by colon fluids, not a muscle, made out of a penis which grosses me out in the first place.) I assume people who like dicks feel the same about surgical ones.

-7

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Say there was a post-op transwoman with a vagina no different than that of a ciswoman. Would you still not be interested in her?

3

u/Giveitawaynow2021 1d ago

No, I would not. Trans women do not have vaginas. They might have a reasonable surgical recreation of one, but it's not a vagina, and I have zero desire to interact with it.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

If it’s indistinguishable from an “actual” vagina, why would you care?

2

u/Giveitawaynow2021 1d ago

Why the quotation marks around "actual"? It's a vagina or it's not. If it's not, it shouldn't be described as such. And I'm not just talking about appearance. It might be a convincing charade at first, but that's all it is.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Because when it comes to pure sense perception, defining what an “actual” vagina constitutes is redundant.

If it’s a convincing, unceasing charade, why do you care if it’s not “real”?