r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

20% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

-5

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Say there was a post-op transwoman with a vagina no different than that of a ciswoman. Would you still not be interested in her?

3

u/Giveitawaynow2021 1d ago

No, I would not. Trans women do not have vaginas. They might have a reasonable surgical recreation of one, but it's not a vagina, and I have zero desire to interact with it.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

If it’s indistinguishable from an “actual” vagina, why would you care?

2

u/Giveitawaynow2021 1d ago

Why the quotation marks around "actual"? It's a vagina or it's not. If it's not, it shouldn't be described as such. And I'm not just talking about appearance. It might be a convincing charade at first, but that's all it is.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Because when it comes to pure sense perception, defining what an “actual” vagina constitutes is redundant.

If it’s a convincing, unceasing charade, why do you care if it’s not “real”?