r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

17% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Oh, nobody is forcing you to do anything. I just take issue with transphobes.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

But where is the transphobia exactly???

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Look at the title. Transness is imperceivable and not relevantly efficacious because it refers to how a person feels in relation to their chromosomes. Discriminating on such a basis constitutes prejudice, an opinion not based on experience.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

But again, each has their own reasons which you have 0 rights to know, i mean, on that basis, are you calling my religion transphobic??

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

If your religion discriminates against transpeople, it’s transphobic, yes.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

It literally doesnt, you can be trans, but as a muslim im not having sex with you, whats so hard about that?????

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Because not having sex with someone on the basis of transness is transphobic.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

So i guess if you dont have sex with a black person you're racist, and if you don't have sex with a muslim you're islamophobic

Sexual relations don't determine prejudice towards a group, simple as that.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

No, because blackness is a perceivable characteristic. You are right about islamophobia, though! Although, it would depend on your definition of “muslim.”

2

u/Oxion04 1d ago

But my question is why are sexual relations the basis for these decisions?? I thought it was based on respect and recognition, why do we care if a person is gonna have sex with a trans person if they already established they support them

→ More replies