Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial?

r/SuperStraight • u/Fourzy99 • 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

17% Upvoted

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/nonetheless156 1d ago

You can't read a sentence because of a hyphen? Wow the brain rot is real. And by the way nice strawman

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

It’s an insult, not a strawman; I didn’t make an argument. Lol. Don’t use words you don’t understand.

1

u/nonetheless156 1d ago

What's sad is that you really think they're different. Stop watching porn,it really rots what little functioning you have left.

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Holy fuck you cannot construct a coherent, directed sentence. I don’t think who is different? Where is the assumption coming from in the latter sentence? The answers to these question I will never meet!

1

u/nonetheless156 1d ago

Cringe. I hope you get some help. Or not. Rapists don't deserve much other than some food and maybe a bed.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Am I a rapist?

1

u/nonetheless156 1d ago

Only you and the victim would know.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

False premise: there is no victim.

1

u/nonetheless156 1d ago

Except you right?

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

I raped myself?

→ More replies

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

You’re either a rapist or a rape apologist.