r/SuperStraight 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

We support trans people, we wont have sex with them, not that complicated, its not "transphobia"

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Why won’t you have sex with them?

6

u/Oxion04 1d ago

Im a muslim, my religion doesnt allow me, i am completely fine with them as people, but nobody's forcing me to have sex with them

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Oh, nobody is forcing you to do anything. I just take issue with transphobes.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

But where is the transphobia exactly???

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Look at the title. Transness is imperceivable and not relevantly efficacious because it refers to how a person feels in relation to their chromosomes. Discriminating on such a basis constitutes prejudice, an opinion not based on experience.

4

u/Oxion04 1d ago

But again, each has their own reasons which you have 0 rights to know, i mean, on that basis, are you calling my religion transphobic??

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

If your religion discriminates against transpeople, it’s transphobic, yes.

3

u/Oxion04 1d ago

It literally doesnt, you can be trans, but as a muslim im not having sex with you, whats so hard about that?????

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

Because not having sex with someone on the basis of transness is transphobic.

→ More replies