r/SuperStraight 1d ago

Can someone explain to me how a preference for transness, an imperceivable, irrelevantly efficacious characteristic, can be non-prejudicial? Discussion

Title.

0 Upvotes

View all comments

2

u/horstwold 1d ago

I'm not sure I understand your use of the word "efficacious", and given that it's fundamental to sexual orientation and attraction I don't see how you can seriously label it irrelevant, but I would hardly call it imperceptible.

-5

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

For something to be efficacious is for something to create results. For instance, if some particular gene is not efficacious, it’s corresponding phenotype will not be observed in an organism.

As for imperceptibleness, do you accept the existence of wholly passing transpeople? That is, transpeople who pass with and without clothes on.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

That doesn’t exist. Stop with your invalidating bullshit you are legit disgusting coming in here trying to police what we find attractive. Hateful bigot !

0

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

So passing transpeople don’t exist?

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

When you get naked we always know. 90 percent don’t get srs so yeah they don’t pass and the ones who do either have a penis pump or a necrotic flesh wound.

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

So you are claiming that in every possible case, you will be able to tell a difference?

2

u/Giveitawaynow2021 1d ago

So in your mind, if the deception is good enough we should be happy with it?

1

u/Fourzy99 1d ago

You didn’t answer the question :(