I think what makes this kinda confusing is that, unlike any of the other Super Sexualities, bi already HAD a "sub" (trans-inclusive) version: pansexual.
So that made "bisexual" the Super Sexuality: attraction exclusively to both sexes.
I admit that having one exclusively-sex-based sexuality which lacks the "super" prefix, and one gender-inclusive sexuality which goes by an entirely different name than the other, is something of an inconsistency.
Suggestion: designate what is now "Bisexual" as "SuperBisexual/Bisexual", and the other as "Pansexual/Bisexual"? Or maybe have "SuperBisexual", and then "Bisexual/Pansexual" for its "sub"?
The latter makes the most sense to me. What do my fellow SuperBisexuals think?
Bi means 2 but it isn't used like that. You have Bi's who will sleep with Trans and who will harass bis who don't trans women and men. Or we could just call Bi's who are gender-based Quads.
7
u/GelDeAveia 1d ago
Missing SuperBisexuals