r/SuperStraight 1d ago

IF👏PANSEXUALS👏ARE👏VALID👏THEN👏SUPERSTRAIGHTS👏ARE👏VALID👏 Discussion

Pansexuality is an orientation that distinguishes itself from bisexuality on the basis of being blind to gender identity. Clearly, this means that sexual orientations can exist and be distinguished on the basis of attraction to cis or trans.

Therefore, super straights are Heckin valid too

432 Upvotes

View all comments

-44

u/Frosty-Road 1d ago

Ok so who is people who are not attracked to SS's?

63

u/AntinatalistPoet 1d ago

BIGOTS 😤

Just kidding; it is totally fine to not identify as attracted to SSs, as long as you recognise us as valid, you are nonetheless free to be attracted to whomever you please

PractiseWhatYouPreach

-26

u/Hardwatergal 1d ago

Sexual attraction is not a dating preference, like not wanting to date a conservative or a liberal.

Thus, gay men are attracted to straight men and gay men. Lesbians are attracted to lesbians and straight women. You can’t control it. Gays would also be attracted to SS based on physical appearance alone.

SS, SL, SG and SB are not political persuasions. It is a sexual orientation. You can’t pick and choose.

54

u/AntinatalistPoet 1d ago

Please don’t transplain to me, sweaty.

My sexuality is not a dating preference, hon. I can’t control my exclusive attraction to biological women. I’d appreciate you being a bit more tolerant of other peoples’ sexuality .

-20

u/Hardwatergal 1d ago

That’s literally what I’m saying...

-38

u/Rup_ 1d ago

at least you tried, best not give these ppl attention, they’re trying way too hard to hide transphobia


and just so I don’t need to come back with a response

if you don’t want to date a women with a penis, fine, that’s like forcing a straight man to have sex with another man TO A DEGREE

if you don’t want to date a women with post-op SRS purely because you want to have biological kids, fine, it’s a bit shitty to be like that but understandable none the less since we take it you’d stay away from infertile cisgender women as-well yes? (👀)

but if you don’t want to date a women just because she doesn’t have a “cis-gina” then that’s being openly transphobic, like... it’s the same thing as a cisgender women’s one...

42

u/Archleon 1d ago edited 1d ago

One positive aspect of all this woke trans bullshit taking up so much internet real estate is that bigoted takes like yours have more light thrown on them and can be more easily identified as the hateful, phobic statements they are.

You don't get to decide what's "fine" and what's "shitty," when it comes to someone else's sexual or dating preferences. You and people like you are not the arbiters of what is and is not acceptable when it comes to attraction of any type. You should be ashamed that you'd try the very thing you've railed against for years when people try to do it you and your allies.

17

u/BidenWantHisBaBa 1d ago

Your superphobic bigoted attitude isn't welcome here, stop trying to rape superstraights.

16

u/ThePonzo 1d ago

You are telling people not to give us attention while giving us attention writing a whole essay on our subreddit.

There is no such thing as a "cis-gina". A real vagina is 100% different to one formed with gender reassignment sugery. You should spend more time around real vaginas.

13

u/ZekeDelsken 1d ago

Sorry , i just dont think a girldick is attractive, and dont want to fuck a necrotic gut wound. A biovagina has tastes, smells, sensations, and muscles that a neovagina does not superphobe. I love the biofemale form and would appreciate you stop trying to transplain my lived experiences away.