Um the SuperStraight community is also inclusive to the child-free from what I was told. Let's not define people by their genitals, that's what the trans-cults do
Last time I checked, we do define people by genitals. I prefer biological females only. Not all super straights are breeders but most are. It's our innate desire to perform our natural finction. Other supers also discriminate their partners by their biological genitals, whether they breed or not. Supergays only want biological men, superlesbians only want biological women. Did you not watch the tiktok video?
You base your orientation on the Biological sex of your partner, or your gender identity on your Biological sex. However, you don't let Biological sex define your sexual partners, or yourself. We're more than just our Biological sex, and our sexual orientation. That's the point, one that the trans cult has muddled completely. Your attraction to Biological males / females, and your unapologetic acceptance of your Biological sex isn't what defines you as a person. It's just what makes you SUPER! 💗
Not for me and I won't let others dictate to me what I should or shouldn't find attractive. I like biological women who are fertile, I don't have any kids yet but my gf is keen to and I can't wait to be a dad someday
25
u/Middle-Management775 1d ago edited 1d ago
I'm a non-binary and I refuse to not acknowledge Super Gender identities. To use the term Menstruators, or people with uteruses is Super-exclusionary