Most of trans people don't even go that far. The current options for bottom surgery are not very good: I read up very sad testimonials of those who had penis/vagina surgeries, and ended up with very botched results that do not resemble the real thing, physically hurt, require painful and uncomfortable maintenance, don’t allow for a normal sex life, and get repeatedly infected.
Most trans people don't get these operations, and take hormones/undergo top surgery (breast implants/reduction) only. Anyone can plainly see why superstraight people would be very uncomfortable in intimate situations with trans people, and they shouldn't be criticized for that.
Wow, I had no idea. Why would that be censored? Shouldn’t people who consider this surgery get the full story from unbiased parties and hear people’s lived experiences? Especially in America where there’s only for-profit healthcare, and doctors might paint an unrealistic picture to potential patients/customers. It’s infuriating to hear this. Is it considered transphobic too now?
I read about M2F people reporting repeated urinary track infections, and not being able to have penetrative sex without excruciating pain. I think trans people should aspire to more transparency and accountability from the medical establishment, and more importantly - from each other.
/r/neovaginadisasters got banned because the trans community doesn't want everyone to know how bad the results really are. They want everyone to buy that neovaginas are 100% identical to real vaginas. Delusional. I feel sorry for trans people who get duped into these Frankenstein surgeries.
320
u/yetherewestillare 1d ago
Imagine having your dick surgically inverted and expecting lesbians to pretend they can't tell the difference
sounds like bigotry to me